• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

历史视图:一种使用可扩展的空间高效时间线且无需缩放交互来查看患者的新方法的实现与评估。

HistoriView: Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Approach to Review a Patient Using a Scalable Space-Efficient Timeline without Zoom Interactions.

作者信息

Park Heekyong, Wang Taowei David, Wattanasin Nich, Castro Victor M, Gainer Vivian, Murphy Shawn

机构信息

Department of Research Information Science and Computing, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts, United States.

Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Mar;15(2):250-264. doi: 10.1055/a-2269-0995. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1055/a-2269-0995
PMID:38359876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10990596/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Timelines have been used for patient review. While maintaining a compact overview is important, merged event representations caused by the intricate and voluminous patient data bring event recognition, access ambiguity, and inefficient interaction problems. Handling large patient data efficiently is another challenge.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop a scalable, efficient timeline to enhance patient review for research purposes. The focus is on addressing the challenges presented by the intricate and voluminous patient data.

METHODS

We propose a high-throughput, space-efficient HistoriView timeline for an individual patient. For a compact overview, it uses nonstacking event representation. An overlay detection algorithm, y-shift visualization, and popup-based interaction facilitate comprehensive analysis of overlapping datasets. An i2b2 HistoriView plugin was deployed, using split query and event reduction approaches, delivering the entire history efficiently without losing information. For evaluation, 11 participants completed a usability survey and a preference survey, followed by qualitative feedback. To evaluate scalability, 100 randomly selected patients over 60 years old were tested on the plugin and were compared with a baseline visualization.

RESULTS

Most participants found that HistoriView was easy to use and learn and delivered information clearly without zooming. All preferred HistoriView over a stacked timeline. They expressed satisfaction on display, ease of learning and use, and efficiency. However, challenges and suggestions for improvement were also identified. In the performance test, the largest patient had 32,630 records, which exceeds the baseline limit. HistoriView reduced it to 2,019 visual artifacts. All patients were pulled and visualized within 45.40 seconds. Visualization took less than 3 seconds for all.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

HistoriView allows complete data exploration without exhaustive interactions in a compact overview. It is useful for dense data or iterative comparisons. However, issues in exploring subconcept records were reported. HistoriView handles large patient data preserving original information in a reasonable time.

摘要

背景

时间线已用于患者回顾。虽然保持简洁的概述很重要,但复杂且大量的患者数据导致的合并事件表示带来了事件识别、访问模糊性和交互效率低下等问题。有效处理大量患者数据是另一项挑战。

目的

本研究旨在开发一种可扩展、高效的时间线,以增强用于研究目的的患者回顾。重点是应对复杂且大量的患者数据带来的挑战。

方法

我们为个体患者提出了一种高通量、节省空间的HistoriView时间线。为了实现简洁的概述,它使用非堆叠事件表示。叠加检测算法、y轴偏移可视化和基于弹出窗口的交互有助于对重叠数据集进行全面分析。部署了一个i2b2 HistoriView插件,使用拆分查询和事件缩减方法,在不丢失信息的情况下高效地提供完整历史记录。为了进行评估,11名参与者完成了可用性调查和偏好调查,随后提供了定性反馈。为了评估可扩展性,对100名随机选择的60岁以上患者在该插件上进行了测试,并与基线可视化进行了比较。

结果

大多数参与者发现HistoriView易于使用和学习,无需缩放即可清晰地提供信息。所有人都更喜欢HistoriView而不是堆叠时间线。他们对显示、易于学习和使用以及效率表示满意。然而,也发现了挑战和改进建议。在性能测试中,最大的患者有32630条记录,超过了基线限制。HistoriView将其减少到2019个视觉元素。所有患者在45.40秒内被提取并可视化。可视化对所有患者来说都不到3秒。

讨论与结论

HistoriView允许在简洁的概述中进行完整的数据探索,而无需进行详尽的交互。它对于密集数据或迭代比较很有用。然而,报告了在探索子概念记录方面的问题。HistoriView在合理的时间内处理大量患者数据并保留原始信息。

相似文献

1
HistoriView: Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Approach to Review a Patient Using a Scalable Space-Efficient Timeline without Zoom Interactions.历史视图:一种使用可扩展的空间高效时间线且无需缩放交互来查看患者的新方法的实现与评估。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Mar;15(2):250-264. doi: 10.1055/a-2269-0995. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
10
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.

本文引用的文献

1
Health timeline: an insight-based study of a timeline visualization of clinical data.健康时间线:基于洞察的临床数据时间线可视化研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0885-x.
2
A Visual Analytics Dashboard to Summarize Serial Anesthesia Records in Pediatric Radiation Treatment.用于总结儿科放射治疗中连续麻醉记录的可视化分析仪表板。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Aug;10(4):563-569. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693712. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
3
Quality Initiative Using Theory of Change and Visual Analytics to Improve Controlled Substance Documentation Discrepancies in the Operating Room.使用变化理论和可视化分析的质量改进措施,以改善手术室中受控物质文件记录的差异。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):543-551. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693688. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Timely Data for Targeted Quality Improvement Interventions: Use of a Visual Analytics Dashboard for Bronchiolitis.及时数据支持针对性质量改进措施:毛细支气管炎可视分析仪表板的应用。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):168-174. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1679868. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
5
Designing a medication timeline for patients and physicians.为患者和医生设计用药时间表。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Feb 1;26(2):95-105. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy143.
6
Doccurate: A Curation-Based Approach for Clinical Text Visualization.Doccurate:一种基于策展的临床文本可视化方法。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018 Aug 20. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864905.
7
NLPReViz: an interactive tool for natural language processing on clinical text.NLPReViz:一个用于临床文本自然语言处理的交互式工具。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Jan 1;25(1):81-87. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx070.
8
TimeSpan: Using Visualization to Explore Temporal Multi-dimensional Data of Stroke Patients.时间跨度:利用可视化探索中风患者的时间多维数据。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2016 Jan;22(1):409-18. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467325. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
9
Visualization of patient prescription history data in emergency care.急诊护理中患者处方历史数据的可视化。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:963-8. eCollection 2014.
10
Graphical display of diagnostic test results in electronic health records: a comparison of 8 systems.电子健康记录中诊断测试结果的图形显示:8种系统的比较
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):900-4. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv013. Epub 2015 Mar 18.