Enright Chloe, Gilbourne Claire, Kiersey Rachel, Parlour Randal, Flanagan Paula, McGowan Emer, Boland Mairin, Mulholland Deirdre
HSE, Dublin, Ireland.
J Infect Prev. 2024 Mar;25(1-2):24-32. doi: 10.1177/17571774231203387. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, an abundance of literature relating to the efficacy of face masks on reducing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare settings emerged.
AIM/OBJECTIVE: The aim of this scoping review was to allow the identification of: types of evidence conducted in this area; knowledge gaps and common concepts relating to mask efficacy in non-healthcare settings.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase and the Irish Management Institute bibliographic database on December 15th, 2021. All types of face masks were included. Of 722 records, 16 were included after full text screening.
FINDINGS/RESULTS: Themes from an adapted model of Howard et al. framework were used to group results and identify common concepts. The grouped thematic results were then applied to the socio-ecological model. This illustrated the multifactorial elements determining the efficacy of masks themselves while also illustrating how other factors such as individual behaviours, social interactions, settings and national policy can influence the degree of the protective effect.
The findings from this scoping review indicate that an abundance of experimental literature is available indicating that masks are effective at preventing COVID-19 transmission but their degree of efficacy is impacted by external factors. This review highlights that the quality of the evidence available is low.
在新冠疫情期间,出现了大量关于口罩在非医疗环境中对减少新冠病毒传播效果的文献。
本范围综述的目的是确定:该领域的证据类型;与非医疗环境中口罩效果相关的知识空白和共同概念。
于2021年12月15日在PubMed、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Embase和爱尔兰管理学院书目数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。纳入了所有类型的口罩。在722条记录中,经过全文筛选后纳入了16条。
采用霍华德等人框架的改编模型中的主题对结果进行分组并确定共同概念。然后将分组的主题结果应用于社会生态模型。这既说明了决定口罩本身效果的多因素要素,也说明了个体行为、社会互动、环境和国家政策等其他因素如何影响保护效果的程度。
本范围综述的结果表明,有大量实验文献表明口罩在预防新冠病毒传播方面是有效的,但其效果程度受到外部因素的影响。本综述强调现有证据的质量较低。