Suppr超能文献

轻柔和缓着地的提示会导致跑步者的地面反作用力加载率急剧降低。

Cues to land softly and quietly result in acute reductions in ground reaction force loading rates in runners.

机构信息

Spaulding National Running Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Rheumatology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Spaulding National Running Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2024 Mar;109:220-225. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.02.008. Epub 2024 Feb 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A common gait retraining goal for runners is reducing vertical ground reaction force (GRF) loading rates (LRs), which have been associated with injury. Many gait retraining programs prioritize an internal focus of attention, despite evidence supporting an external focus of attention when a specific outcome is desired (e.g., LR reduction).

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does an external focus of attention (using cues for quiet, soft landings) result in comparable reductions in LRs to those achieved using a common internal focus (forefoot striking while barefoot)?

METHODS

This observational study included 37 injured runners (18 male; mean age 36 (14) years) at the OMITTED Running Center. Runners wore inertial measurement units over the distal-medial tibia while running on an instrumented treadmill at a self-selected speed. Data were collected for three conditions: 1) Shod-Control (wearing shoes, without cues); 2) Shod-Quiet (wearing shoes, cues for quiet, soft landings); and 3) Barefoot-FFS (barefoot, cues for forefoot strike (FFS)). Within-subject variables were compared across conditions: vertical instantaneous loading rate (LR, primary outcome); vertical stiffness during initial loading; peak vertical GRF; peak vertical tibial acceleration (TA); and cadence.

RESULTS

Vertical LR, stiffness, and TA were lower in the Shod-Quiet compared to Shod-Control p < 0.001). Peak vertical GRF and cadence were not different between Shod-Quiet and Shod-Control. Reductions in stiffness and LR were similar between Shod-Quiet and Barefoot-FFS, and GRF in Barefoot-FFS remained similar to both shod conditions. However, runners demonstrated additional reductions in TA and increased cadence when transitioning from Shod-Quiet to the Barefoot-FFS condition (p < 0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE

These results suggests that a focus on quiet, soft landings may be an effective gait retraining method for future research.

摘要

背景

跑步者常见的步态再训练目标是降低垂直地面反作用力(GRF)加载率(LR),因为这种力与受伤有关。许多步态再训练计划都强调内部注意力,尽管有证据表明,当期望特定结果(例如 LR 降低)时,外部注意力更有效。

研究问题

外部注意力(使用安静、轻柔着地的提示)是否会导致与使用常见内部注意力(赤脚前脚掌着地)相同的 LR 降低?

方法

这项观察性研究包括 OMITTED 跑步中心的 37 名受伤跑步者(18 名男性;平均年龄 36(14)岁)。跑步者在惯性测量单元上跑步时,在仪器化跑步机上以自我选择的速度跑步,同时在胫骨的远中侧佩戴。共收集了三种条件的数据:1)穿鞋控制(穿鞋,无提示);2)穿鞋安静(穿鞋,安静、轻柔着地的提示);3)赤脚前脚掌(赤脚,前脚掌着地的提示)。对各条件下的受试者内变量进行比较:垂直瞬时加载率(LR,主要结果);初始加载时的垂直刚度;最大垂直 GRF;最大垂直胫骨加速度(TA);和步频。

结果

与 Shod-Control 相比,Shod-Quiet 条件下的垂直 LR、刚度和 TA 均降低(p<0.001)。Shod-Quiet 和 Shod-Control 之间的最大垂直 GRF 和步频没有差异。Shod-Quiet 和 Barefoot-FFS 之间的刚度和 LR 降低幅度相似,而 Barefoot-FFS 的 GRF 与两个穿鞋条件相似。然而,当从 Shod-Quiet 过渡到 Barefoot-FFS 条件时,跑步者表现出 TA 进一步降低和步频增加(p<0.05)。

意义

这些结果表明,关注安静、轻柔着地可能是未来研究中一种有效的步态再训练方法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验