Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
BMJ. 2018 Sep 10;362:k3030. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3030.
Perioperative lung injury is a major source of postoperative morbidity, excess healthcare use, and avoidable mortality. Many potential inciting factors can lead to this condition, including intraoperative ventilator induced lung injury. Questions exist as to whether protective ventilation strategies used in the intensive care unit for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome are equally beneficial for surgical patients, most of whom do not present with any pre-existing lung pathology. Studied both individually and in combination as a package of intraoperative lung protective ventilation, the use of low tidal volumes, moderate positive end expiratory pressure, and recruitment maneuvers have been shown to improve oxygenation and pulmonary physiology and to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications in at risk patient groups. Further work is needed to define the potential contributions of alternative ventilator strategies, limiting excessive intraoperative oxygen supplementation, use of non-invasive techniques in the postoperative period, and personalized mechanical ventilation. Although the weight of evidence strongly suggests a role for lung protective ventilation in moderate risk patient groups, definitive evidence of its benefit for the general surgical population does not exist. However, given the shift in understanding of what is needed for adequate oxygenation and ventilation under anesthesia, the largely historical arguments against the use of intraoperative lung protective ventilation may soon be outdated, on the basis of its expanding track record of safety and efficacy in multiple settings.
围手术期肺损伤是术后发病率、过度医疗保健使用和可避免死亡的主要原因。许多潜在的诱发因素可导致这种情况,包括术中呼吸机诱导的肺损伤。对于急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者在重症监护病房中使用的保护性通气策略是否同样有益于大多数没有任何预先存在的肺部疾病的手术患者存在疑问。低潮气量、适度的呼气末正压和复张手法单独或作为术中肺保护性通气的一揽子方案进行研究,已被证明可改善氧合和肺生理,并降低高危患者群体的术后肺部并发症。需要进一步研究以确定替代通气策略、限制术中过度氧补充、术后使用非侵入性技术以及个体化机械通气的潜在作用。尽管大量证据强烈表明肺保护性通气在中度风险患者群体中具有作用,但对于普通外科人群,其益处尚无明确证据。然而,鉴于对麻醉下充分氧合和通气所需条件的理解发生转变,基于其在多种情况下的安全性和有效性的扩展记录,针对术中肺保护性通气的广泛历史争议可能很快就会过时。