• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用离体猪模型对膀胱肿瘤整块切除进行前瞻性学习曲线分析。

Prospective learning curve analysis of en bloc resection of bladder tumor using an ex vivo porcine model.

作者信息

Yao Qiu, Jiang Huizhong, Niu Hui, Hu Guangmo, Liu Xiaolong, Xue Boxin

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 1055 Sanxiang Road, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Operating Room, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02355-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02355-w
PMID:38374046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10877915/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As a relatively new surgical technique, the learning curve of en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) in ex vivo models remains unaddressed. This study aimed to explore the learning curve of ERBT in an ex vivo porcine model.

METHODS

In this prospective study, eight endoscopists without prior experience in ERBT were divided into two groups: junior endoscopists, with less than 100 transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) procedure experience, and senior endoscopists, with at least 100 TURBT procedure experience. Each endoscopist performed 30 ERBT procedures on artificial lesions in an ex vivo porcine bladder model. The procedure time, perforation, en bloc resection status, and absence of detrusor muscle (DM) were recorded. The inflection points were identified using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Procedure results were compared between the two phases and two groups.

RESULTS

In all, 240 artificial lesions were successfully resected using ERBT. The CUSUM regression line indicated the inflection point at the 16th procedure for the junior endoscopists and at the 13th procedure for the senior endoscopists. In both groups, the procedure time, perforation, piecemeal resection, and DM absence rates were significantly lower in the consolidation phase than in the initial phase. The procedure time for the senior endoscopists was lower than for the junior endoscopists in both phases.

CONCLUSIONS

ERBT performance improved significantly after reaching the inflection point of the learning curve in the ex vivo model. We recommend a minimum of 16 ERBT procedures in ex vivo models for urologists with less than 100 TURBT experience and a minimum of 13 procedures for those with at least 100 TURBT experience before advancing to live animal training or supervised clinical practice.

摘要

背景

作为一种相对较新的外科技术,膀胱肿瘤整块切除术(ERBT)在体外模型中的学习曲线尚未得到研究。本研究旨在探讨ERBT在体外猪模型中的学习曲线。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,8名此前无ERBT经验的内镜医师被分为两组:经验不足100例经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)的初级内镜医师和经验至少100例TURBT的高级内镜医师。每位内镜医师在体外猪膀胱模型中的人工病变上进行30例ERBT手术。记录手术时间、穿孔情况、整块切除状态以及逼尿肌缺失情况。使用累积和(CUSUM)分析确定拐点。比较两个阶段和两组之间的手术结果。

结果

总共使用ERBT成功切除了240个人工病变。CUSUM回归线显示,初级内镜医师在第16例手术时出现拐点,高级内镜医师在第13例手术时出现拐点。在两组中,巩固阶段的手术时间、穿孔情况、碎块切除情况和逼尿肌缺失率均显著低于初始阶段。在两个阶段,高级内镜医师的手术时间均低于初级内镜医师。

结论

在体外模型中达到学习曲线的拐点后,ERBT的操作有显著改善。我们建议,对于TURBT经验不足100例的泌尿外科医师,在体外模型中至少进行16例ERBT手术;对于TURBT经验至少100例的医师,在进入活体动物训练或临床实践指导之前,至少进行13例手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/3996876b818b/12893_2024_2355_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/e28f293a3453/12893_2024_2355_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/2101bb7a5f3e/12893_2024_2355_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/9e5cdb944593/12893_2024_2355_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/189e5d00f12e/12893_2024_2355_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/93b4b5f082b1/12893_2024_2355_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/1246967bc920/12893_2024_2355_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/3996876b818b/12893_2024_2355_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/e28f293a3453/12893_2024_2355_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/2101bb7a5f3e/12893_2024_2355_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/9e5cdb944593/12893_2024_2355_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/189e5d00f12e/12893_2024_2355_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/93b4b5f082b1/12893_2024_2355_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/1246967bc920/12893_2024_2355_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ac/10877915/3996876b818b/12893_2024_2355_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prospective learning curve analysis of en bloc resection of bladder tumor using an ex vivo porcine model.使用离体猪模型对膀胱肿瘤整块切除进行前瞻性学习曲线分析。
BMC Surg. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02355-w.
2
En bloc resection of bladder tumors: challenges and unmet needs in 2022.整块切除膀胱肿瘤:2022 年的挑战和未满足的需求。
Future Oncol. 2022 Jun;18(20):2545-2558. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-1228. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
3
Rotatable Bi-Channel En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumor for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer in an Ex Vivo Porcine Model.体外猪模型中可旋转双通道整块切除非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的膀胱肿瘤
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 25;15(17):4255. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174255.
4
En Bloc Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Noninferiority Trial.整块切除与传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗膀胱肿瘤的单中心前瞻性随机非劣效性试验。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Aug;5(4):440-448. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 23.
5
An International Collaborative Consensus Statement on En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumour Incorporating Two Systematic Reviews, a Two-round Delphi Survey, and a Consensus Meeting.国际协作共识声明:整块切除膀胱肿瘤,包含两项系统评价、两轮德尔菲调查和一次共识会议。
Eur Urol. 2020 Oct;78(4):546-569. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.059. Epub 2020 May 8.
6
Prospective non-randomized comparison of transurethral laser en bloc resection vs. conventional resection of bladder tumors larger than 3 cm.经尿道激光整块切除术与传统切除术治疗大于 3cm 的膀胱肿瘤的前瞻性非随机比较。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024 Aug;76(4):436-441. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05682-9.
7
[Safety and efficacy of en bloc vs. conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors: a meta-analysis and systematic review].整块切除与传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的安全性和有效性:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Urologie. 2022 Jun;61(6):644-652. doi: 10.1007/s00120-022-01765-z. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
8
Transurethral en bloc resection with monopolar current for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer based on TNM system.基于TNM系统的经尿道单极电流整块切除治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Apr;9(4):2210-2219. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.03.48.
9
Current Techniques for En Bloc Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: A Hands-on Guide Through the Energy Landscape.当前整块经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的技术:能量景观中的实践指南。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Jul;9(4):567-570. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 May 11.
10
A 10-year renaissance of en bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT): Are we approaching the peak or is it back to the trough?膀胱肿瘤整块切除术(ERBT)的十年复兴:我们是在接近峰值还是回到低谷?
World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2607-2615. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04439-3. Epub 2023 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Personalized and Simplified Ovarian Cystectomy Practice Tool.个性化简化卵巢囊肿切除术实践工具的开发
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025 Feb 27;14(1):94-95. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_12_24. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
2
Recent Advances and Emerging Innovations in Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor (TURBT) for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Current Literature.非肌层浸润性膀胱癌经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)的最新进展与新兴创新:当前文献综述
Res Rep Urol. 2025 Mar 14;17:69-85. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S386026. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
National Implementation of Simulator Training Improves Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumours in Patients.全国范围内实施模拟器培训可改善患者膀胱肿瘤经尿道切除术的效果。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Apr 1;39:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.003. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Learning curve and proficiency metrics for transcarotid artery revascularization.经颈动脉血运重建术的学习曲线和熟练程度指标。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1966-1976.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.12.073. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
3
En bloc resection for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: selecting a proper laser.
非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的整块切除:选择合适的激光
Curr Opin Urol. 2022 Mar 1;32(2):173-178. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000968.
4
Learning curve for two-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lung segmentectomy.两孔视频辅助胸腔镜肺段切除术的学习曲线。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb 21;34(3):402-407. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab236.
5
Safety and efficacy of thulium laser resection of bladder tumors versus transurethral resection of bladder tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.钬激光与经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗膀胱肿瘤的安全性和有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Dec;36(9):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03272-7. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
6
Transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT).经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)。
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec;9(6):3056-3072. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.38.
7
Holmium Laser En-bloc Resection Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors for Treatment of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.钬激光整块切除术与传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的随机临床试验。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):1035-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
8
Feasibility and accuracy of pathological diagnosis in en-bloc transurethral resection specimens versus conventional transurethral resection specimens of bladder tumour: evaluation with pT1 substaging by 10 pathologists.整块经尿道切除标本与传统经尿道切除标本在膀胱肿瘤病理诊断中的可行性和准确性:10 位病理学家评估 pT1 亚分期的效果。
Histopathology. 2021 Jun;78(7):943-950. doi: 10.1111/his.14307. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
9
The learning curve of TaTME for mid-low rectal cancer: a comprehensive analysis from a five-year institutional experience.TaTME 治疗中低位直肠癌的学习曲线:来自五年机构经验的综合分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6190-6200. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08115-0. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
10
An International Collaborative Consensus Statement on En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumour Incorporating Two Systematic Reviews, a Two-round Delphi Survey, and a Consensus Meeting.国际协作共识声明:整块切除膀胱肿瘤,包含两项系统评价、两轮德尔菲调查和一次共识会议。
Eur Urol. 2020 Oct;78(4):546-569. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.059. Epub 2020 May 8.