First Department of Urology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, "G Gennimatas" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, 54635, Greece.
Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, The People's Republic of China.
Future Oncol. 2022 Jun;18(20):2545-2558. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-1228. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer accounts for the majority of new bladder cancer diagnoses, and endoscopic transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) represents the standard-of-care. Although a relatively safe and common procedure, TURBT is often hampered by the questionable quality of resection. The evolution of surgical techniques has brought en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) to the forefront. ERBT has emerged as an alternative to conventional TURBT, incorporating a more delicate en bloc sculpting and tumor excision, in contrast to 'piecemeal' resection by conventional TURBT. ERBT appears safe, feasible and effective with demonstrably higher rates of detrusor muscle in the pathologic specimen, all while providing better staging and obviating the need for a re-TURBT in selected patients. However, the method's adoption in the field is still limited. This review summarizes the recent evidence relevant to ERBT while further highlighting the technique's limitations and unmet needs.
非肌层浸润性膀胱癌占新诊断膀胱癌的大多数,经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TURBT)是标准的治疗方法。尽管 TURBT 是一种相对安全且常见的手术,但由于切除质量存在疑问,其应用受到了阻碍。手术技术的发展使整块切除膀胱肿瘤(ERBT)成为了一种替代方法。ERBT 已成为传统 TURBT 的替代方法,与传统 TURBT 的“分片式”切除相比,它采用了更精细的整块雕刻和肿瘤切除。ERBT 似乎是安全、可行和有效的,病理标本中显示出更高的逼尿肌检出率,同时提供了更好的分期,并避免了在选定患者中再次进行 TURBT 的需要。然而,该方法在临床中的应用仍然有限。本文综述了与 ERBT 相关的最新证据,同时进一步强调了该技术的局限性和未满足的需求。