• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引入降低自付费用计划后,银屑病生物制剂使用方面的经济差距有所缩小。

Reduced economic disparity in biologics use for psoriasis after introducing the reducing copayment program.

作者信息

Jung Hyemin, Kim Seong Rae, Cho Soo Ick, Jo Seong Jin

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Education and Human Resource Developement, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 20;14(1):4139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54447-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-54447-5
PMID:38374130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10876659/
Abstract

Biologics for psoriasis are efficient and safe, but very expensive. We investigated the association of the reducing copayment program (RCP) with changes in biologics use patterns depending on the income levels of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. This nationwide cohort study included patients identified as having moderate-to-severe psoriasis between 2014 and 2020. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio for the use of biologics according to income levels. Among 57,139 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, 3464 (6.1%) used biologics for psoriasis from 2014 to 2020. After the introduction of RCP in 2017, the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis using biologics rapidly increased from 5.0% in 2016 to 19.2% in 2020; the increase was more remarkable in patients with the lowest or mid-low income compared to those with Medical Aid. Drug survival of biologics was higher in patients with the highest income before the RCP, but became comparable between those with high and low incomes after RCP introduction. The introduction of RCP was associated with an increased use of biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis of all income levels; however, the effect was more pronounced in low-income patients. The RCP may contribute to alleviating the disparity in access to biologics.

摘要

用于治疗银屑病的生物制剂有效且安全,但价格昂贵。我们研究了降低自付费用计划(RCP)与生物制剂使用模式变化之间的关联,该关联取决于中重度银屑病患者的收入水平。这项全国性队列研究纳入了2014年至2020年间被确诊为中重度银屑病的患者。采用逻辑回归模型根据收入水平估算使用生物制剂的比值比。在57139例中重度银屑病患者中,2014年至2020年期间有3464例(6.1%)使用生物制剂治疗银屑病。2017年引入RCP后,中重度银屑病患者使用生物制剂的比例从2016年的5.0%迅速增至2020年的19.2%;与医疗救助患者相比,低收入或中低收入患者的增幅更为显著。在引入RCP之前,高收入患者使用生物制剂的持续时间更长,但引入RCP后,高收入和低收入患者之间的持续时间变得相当。引入RCP与所有收入水平的中重度银屑病患者使用生物制剂的增加有关;然而,这种影响在低收入患者中更为明显。RCP可能有助于缓解生物制剂获取方面的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d32/10876659/7c1921117433/41598_2024_54447_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d32/10876659/355817ee3489/41598_2024_54447_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d32/10876659/7c1921117433/41598_2024_54447_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d32/10876659/355817ee3489/41598_2024_54447_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d32/10876659/7c1921117433/41598_2024_54447_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reduced economic disparity in biologics use for psoriasis after introducing the reducing copayment program.引入降低自付费用计划后,银屑病生物制剂使用方面的经济差距有所缩小。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 20;14(1):4139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54447-5.
2
A Comparison of Psoriasis Severity in Pediatric Patients Treated With Methotrexate vs Biologic Agents.甲氨蝶呤与生物制剂治疗儿童银屑病患者的严重程度比较。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Apr 1;156(4):384-392. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4835.
3
Language proficiency and biologics access: a population study of psoriasis patients in the United States.语言能力与生物制剂可及性:美国银屑病患者的一项人群研究。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 May;33(3):1413-1417. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1820936. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
4
Insurance Coverage of Biologics for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Retrospective, Observational 5-Year Chart Review.中度至重度银屑病生物制剂的保险覆盖情况:一项回顾性、观察性的5年病历审查。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016 Aug;17(4):421-4. doi: 10.1007/s40257-016-0194-4.
5
Comparative Effectiveness of Biologics Across Subgroups of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results at Week 12 from the PSoHO Study in a Real-World Setting.生物制剂在中重度斑块状银屑病患者亚组中的疗效比较:真实世界环境中 PSoHO 研究在第 12 周的结果。
Adv Ther. 2023 Mar;40(3):869-886. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02379-9. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
The higher proportion of men with psoriasis treated with biologics may be explained by more severe disease in men.男性银屑病患者接受生物制剂治疗的比例较高,可能是由于男性疾病更严重。
PLoS One. 2013 May 15;8(5):e63619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063619. Print 2013.
7
Real-world treatment patterns and healthcare costs among biologic-naive patients initiating apremilast or biologics for the treatment of psoriasis.初治生物制剂的银屑病患者开始使用阿普米司特或生物制剂的真实世界治疗模式及医疗费用
J Med Econ. 2019 Apr;22(4):365-371. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1571500. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
8
Safety, efficacy and drug survival of biologics and biosimilars for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.中重度斑块型银屑病生物制剂和生物类似药的安全性、疗效和药物存续性。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Feb;178(2):509-519. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16102. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
9
Improved effectiveness from individualized dosing of self-administered biologics for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a 5-year retrospective chart review from a Spanish University Hospital.个体化给药的自我注射生物制剂治疗中重度银屑病的疗效改善:来自西班牙一家大学医院的5年回顾性病历审查
J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 Jun;31(4):370-377. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1602246. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
Dose Tapering of Biologics in Patients with Psoriasis: A Scoping Review.银屑病患者生物制剂的剂量递减:范围综述。
Drugs. 2021 Feb;81(3):349-366. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01448-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Biological Therapy for Psoriasis on the Development of Psoriatic Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study.银屑病生物治疗对银屑病关节炎发生发展的影响:一项基于人群的队列研究
BioDrugs. 2025 Jan;39(1):143-152. doi: 10.1007/s40259-024-00689-8. Epub 2024 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Systemic Psoriasis Treatment: Is Psoriasis Still Being Undertreated?系统性银屑病治疗的趋势:银屑病仍未得到充分治疗吗?
Ann Dermatol. 2023 Aug;35(4):321-324. doi: 10.5021/ad.21.151.
2
The association between cost sharing, prior authorization, and specialty drug utilization: A systematic review.费用分担、事先授权与专科药物使用之间的关联:系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 May;29(5):449-463. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.5.449.
3
Epidemiology of Psoriasis and Comorbid Diseases: A Narrative Review.银屑病的流行病学和合并症:一篇叙述性综述。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jun 10;13:880201. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.880201. eCollection 2022.
4
Comorbidity in Adult Psoriasis: Considerations for the Clinician.成人银屑病的共病:临床医生需考虑的因素
Psoriasis (Auckl). 2022 Jun 10;12:139-150. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S328572. eCollection 2022.
5
Stigmatization in Patients With Psoriasis: A Mini Review.银屑病患者的污名化:小型综述。
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 15;12:715839. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.715839. eCollection 2021.
6
Cardiometabolic Comorbidities in Patients With Psoriasis: Focusing on Risk, Biological Therapy, and Pathogenesis.银屑病患者的心脏代谢合并症:聚焦于风险、生物治疗和发病机制。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 4;12:774808. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.774808. eCollection 2021.
7
Risk of psoriasis according to body mass index: A retrospective cohort analysis.体重指数与银屑病发病风险的关系:一项回顾性队列分析。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 May;86(5):1020-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.012. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
8
Uptake of Biosimilars and Its Economic Implication for the Treatment of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Korea.韩国接受生物类似药及其对类风湿关节炎患者治疗的经济影响。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 May 24;36(20):e143. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e143.
9
Psoriasis: a brief overview.银屑病:简要概述。
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 May;21(3):170-173. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0257.
10
Biologic Treatment Algorithms for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis with Comorbid Conditions and Special Populations: A Review.伴有合并症和特殊人群的中重度银屑病的生物治疗算法:综述。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Jul;22(4):425-442. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00603-w. Epub 2021 Apr 16.