Buiatte Vinicius, Fonseca Ana, Alonso Madureira Paloma, Nakashima Vaz Andréia Cristina, Tizioto Polyana Cristine, Centola Vidal Ana Maria, Ganda Erika, de Azevedo Ruiz Vera Letticie
Department of Animal Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54269-5.
The oral cavity is the portal of entry for many microorganisms that affect swine, and the swine oral fluid has been used as a specimen for the diagnosis of several infectious diseases. The oral microbiota has been shown to play important roles in humans, such as protection against non-indigenous bacteria. In swine, studies that have investigated the microbial composition of the oral cavity of pigs are scarce. This study aimed to characterize the oral fluid microbiota of weaned pigs from five commercial farms in Brazil and compare it to their respective fecal and environmental microbiotas. Bacterial compositions were determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and analyzed in R Studio. Oral fluid samples were significantly less diverse (alpha diversity) than pen floor and fecal samples (P < 0.01). Alpha diversity changed among farms in oral fluid and pen floor samples, but no differences were observed in fecal samples. Permutational ANOVA revealed that beta diversity was significantly different among sample types (P = 0.001) and farms (P = 0.001), with separation of sample types (feces, pen floor, and oral fluid) on the principal coordinates analysis. Most counts obtained from oral fluid samples were classified as Firmicutes (80.4%) and Proteobacteria (7.7%). The genera Streptococcus, members of the Pasteurellaceae family, and Veillonella were differentially abundant in oral fluid samples when compared to fecal samples, in which Streptococcus was identified as a core genus that was strongly correlated (SparCC) with other taxa. Firmicutes and Bacteroidota were the most relatively abundant phyla identified in fecal and pen floor samples, and Prevotella_9 was the most classified genus. No differentially abundant taxa were identified when comparing fecal samples and pen floor samples. We concluded that under the conditions of our study, the oral fluid microbiota of weaned piglets is different (beta diversity) and less diverse (alpha diversity) than the fecal and environmental microbiotas. Several differentially abundant taxa were identified in the oral fluid samples, and some have been described as important colonizers of the oral cavity in human microbiome studies. Further understanding of the relationship between the oral fluid microbiota and swine is necessary and would create opportunities for the development of innovative solutions that target the microbiota to improve swine health and production.
口腔是许多影响猪的微生物的进入门户,猪口腔液已被用作诊断几种传染病的样本。口腔微生物群已被证明在人类中发挥重要作用,例如抵御非本土细菌。在猪身上,研究猪口腔微生物组成的研究很少。本研究旨在对来自巴西五个商业农场的断奶仔猪口腔液微生物群进行特征分析,并将其与其各自的粪便和环境微生物群进行比较。通过16S rRNA基因测序确定细菌组成,并在R Studio中进行分析。口腔液样本的多样性(α多样性)明显低于猪舍地面和粪便样本(P < 0.01)。口腔液和猪舍地面样本的α多样性在不同农场之间有所变化,但粪便样本中未观察到差异。置换方差分析显示,β多样性在样本类型(P = 0.001)和农场(P = 0.001)之间存在显著差异,在主坐标分析中样本类型(粪便、猪舍地面和口腔液)得以区分。从口腔液样本中获得的大多数计数被归类为厚壁菌门(80.4%)和变形菌门(7.7%)。与粪便样本相比,口腔液样本中链球菌属、巴斯德菌科成员和韦荣球菌属的丰度存在差异,其中链球菌被确定为与其他分类群高度相关(SparCC)的核心属。厚壁菌门和拟杆菌门是在粪便和猪舍地面样本中鉴定出的相对丰度最高的门,普雷沃菌属9是分类最多的属。比较粪便样本和猪舍地面样本时未发现丰度有差异的分类群。我们得出结论,在我们的研究条件下,断奶仔猪的口腔液微生物群与粪便和环境微生物群不同(β多样性)且多样性较低(α多样性)。在口腔液样本中鉴定出了几种丰度有差异的分类群,其中一些在人类微生物组研究中被描述为口腔的重要定植菌。进一步了解口腔液微生物群与猪之间的关系是必要的,这将为开发针对微生物群的创新解决方案创造机会,以改善猪的健康和生产。