School of Environment and Science, Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Kessels Road, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.
School of Engineering and Built Environment, Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Kessels Road, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.
Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;73(6):1167-1179. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01945-x. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
This review proposes that mineral-based greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation could be developed into a substantial climate change abatement tool. This proposal was evaluated via three objectives: (1) synthesise literature studies documenting the effectiveness of geological minerals at mitigating GHG emissions; (2) quantify, via meta-analysis, GHG magnitudes that could be abated by minerals factoring-in the carbon footprint of the approach; and (3) estimate the global availability of relevant minerals. Several minerals have been effectively harnessed across multiple sectors-including agriculture, waste management and coal mining-to mitigate carbon dioxide/CO (e.g., olivine), methane/CH (e.g., allophane, gypsum) and nitrous oxide/NO (e.g., vermiculite) emissions. High surface area minerals offer substantial promise to protect soil carbon, albeit their potential impact here is difficult to quantify. Although mineral-based NO reduction strategies can achieve gross emission reduction, their application generates a net carbon emission due to prohibitively large mineral quantities needed. By contrast, mineral-based technologies could abate ~9% and 11% of global CO and CH anthropogenic emissions, respectively. These estimates conservatively only consider options which offer additional benefits to climate change mitigation (e.g., nutrient supply to agricultural landscapes, and safety controls in landfill operations). This multi-benefit aspect is important due to the reluctance to invest in stand-alone GHG mitigation technologies. Minerals that exhibit high GHG mitigation potential are globally abundant. However, their application towards a dedicated global GHG mitigation initiative would entail significant escalation of their current production rates. A detailed cost-benefit analysis and environmental and social footprint assessment is needed to ascertain the strategy's scale-up potential.
本综述提出,基于矿物质的温室气体(GHG)缓解措施可以发展成为一种重要的气候变化减排工具。为了评估这一建议,我们通过三个目标来进行:(1)综合文献研究,记录地质矿物质在减少温室气体排放方面的有效性;(2)通过荟萃分析量化,考虑到该方法的碳足迹,矿物质可以减排的 GHG 量;(3)估计相关矿物质的全球可用性。已经有几种矿物质在多个领域得到了有效利用,包括农业、废物管理和煤炭开采,以减少二氧化碳/CO(例如橄榄石)、甲烷/CH(例如埃洛石、石膏)和氧化亚氮/NO(例如蛭石)的排放。高比表面积矿物质在保护土壤碳方面具有很大的潜力,尽管它们的潜在影响很难量化。虽然基于矿物质的 NO 减排策略可以实现总排放量的减少,但由于需要大量的矿物质,它们的应用会产生净碳排放。相比之下,基于矿物质的技术可以分别减少全球人为 CO 和 CH 排放量的约 9%和 11%。这些估计只是保守地考虑了为气候变化缓解提供额外好处的选择(例如,为农业景观提供养分供应,以及在垃圾填埋场作业中进行安全控制)。由于不愿意投资于单独的 GHG 减排技术,这种多效益方面很重要。具有高 GHG 减排潜力的矿物质在全球范围内丰富。然而,将它们应用于专门的全球 GHG 减排倡议中,将需要大幅提高其当前的生产速度。需要进行详细的成本效益分析以及环境和社会足迹评估,以确定该策略的扩大潜力。