Suppr超能文献

微创预备前后 GentleWave 系统清除下颌磨牙近中根面生物膜的疗效:一项离体研究。

Efficacy of the GentleWave System in the removal of biofilm from the mesial roots of mandibular molars before and after minimal instrumentation: An ex vivo study.

机构信息

Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2024 Jul;57(7):922-932. doi: 10.1111/iej.14044. Epub 2024 Feb 19.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the efficacy of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm removal using the GentleWave System (GWS) (Sonendo Inc, CA) on non-instrumented versus minimally instrumented root canal systems.

METHODOLOGY

Thirty-four mandibular molars were autoclaved and allocated to four groups: Negative control (n = 5); positive control (n = 5); Group 1: non-instrumentation + GWS (NI + GWS) (n = 12); and Group 2: minimal instrumentation + GWS (MI + GWS) (n = 12). Of 34 samples, 24 samples with Vertucci type 2 configuration within the mesial root of each sample were allocated to Groups 1 and 2 and then matched based on the working length and root canal configuration. After inoculation of samples with E. faecalis for 3 weeks, the GWS was used on Group 1 without any instrumentation and Group 2 after instrumentation of mesial canals until size 20/06v. CFU and SEM analysis were used.

RESULTS

Log (CFU/mL) from the positive control, and Group 1 and 2 were 7.41 ± 0.53, 3.41 ± 1.54, and 3.21 ± 1.54, respectively. Both groups showed a statistically significant difference in the reduction of viable E. faecalis cells compared to the positive control (Group 1 [p = .0001] and Group 2 [p < .0001]), whilst showing no significant difference between the two tested groups (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The use of GWS on the non-instrumented root canal system could be an effective disinfection protocol in removing the biofilm without dentin debris formation.

摘要

目的

比较 GentleWave 系统(GWS)(Sonendo Inc,CA)去除粪肠球菌生物膜在非器械化和最小器械化根管系统中的疗效。

方法

34 颗下颌磨牙经高压灭菌后,分为四组:阴性对照组(n=5);阳性对照组(n=5);第 1 组:非器械化+GWS(NI+GWS)(n=12);第 2 组:最小器械化+GWS(MI+GWS)(n=12)。34 个样本中,每个样本近中根有 24 个样本为 Vertucci 2 型构型,分配到第 1 组和第 2 组,然后根据工作长度和根管构型进行匹配。将粪肠球菌接种到样本中 3 周后,第 1 组在不进行任何器械处理的情况下使用 GWS,第 2 组在近中根管器械处理后使用 GWS,直到使用 20/06v 锉。使用 CFU 和 SEM 分析。

结果

阳性对照组和第 1 组和第 2 组的 CFU/ml 对数分别为 7.41±0.53、3.41±1.54 和 3.21±1.54。与阳性对照组相比,两组均能显著降低粪肠球菌活细胞数(第 1 组 [p=0.0001]和第 2 组 [p<0.0001]),而两组之间无显著差异(p<0.05)。

结论

在非器械化根管系统中使用 GWS 可以作为一种有效的消毒方案,在不形成牙本质碎屑的情况下去除生物膜。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验