Michelis Ilaria, Makepeace Jane, Reis Chen
Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
FHI 360, Washington, DC, USA.
Violence Against Women. 2025 May;31(6-7):1514-1535. doi: 10.1177/10778012241231783. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
Since the 1990s, the international humanitarian system has developed approaches, tools, and standards for addressing gender-based violence (GBV) in emergencies premised on the survivor-centered approach (SCA). Utilizing critical discourse analysis, we explore how articulation of SCA within humanitarian discourse aligns with its stated intent to return control to survivors. The analysis reveals that humanitarian system power dynamics distort the application of SCA, leaving humanitarian service providers in charge of assessing the best course of action or severely limiting survivors' choices. We propose a survivor led approach as more aligned with the feminist and transformative goals of humanitarian action against GBV.
自20世纪90年代以来,国际人道主义系统已制定了一些方法、工具和标准,用于在以幸存者为中心的方法(SCA)前提下应对紧急情况下的性别暴力(GBV)。通过批判性话语分析,我们探讨了人道主义话语中SCA的阐述如何与其将控制权交还给幸存者的既定意图保持一致。分析表明,人道主义系统的权力动态扭曲了SCA的应用,使得人道主义服务提供者负责评估最佳行动方案,或者严重限制了幸存者的选择。我们提出一种由幸存者主导的方法,认为它更符合针对性别暴力的人道主义行动的女权主义和变革性目标。