• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用数字孪生作为可持续能源解决方案:家庭采用的决定因素。

Adoption of digital twins as a sustainable energy solution: Determinants to adoption in household.

作者信息

Coelho Joana, Oliveira Tiago, Neves Catarina, Karatzas Stylianos

机构信息

NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, 1070-312, Lisboa, Portugal.

University of Patras, University Campus, 265 04, Rio, Patras, Greece.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Feb 7;10(4):e25782. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25782. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25782
PMID:38375314
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10875425/
Abstract

Digital Twin (DT) consists of a recent technology that can enable sustainability. However, Digital Twins are still in early stages of adoption, especially in households, and so the determinants to this adoption have not yet been determined. The aim of this study is to fill this research gap through providing a conceptual model of the drivers to the adoption of Digital Twins in households and it's relation to well-being. This study is developed as a mixed-methods research. The model is produced qualitatively, based on literature discoveries and key findings from interviews with experts and possible consumers. Afterwards, the model was validated with data collected through a questionnaire with 149 respondents. Results show that a set of informational, social, environmental and utility factors can influence the intention to adopt Digital Twins as a sustainable energy solution, and consequently the perceived well-being.

摘要

数字孪生(DT)是一项能够促进可持续发展的新兴技术。然而,数字孪生仍处于应用的早期阶段,尤其是在家庭领域,因此尚未确定其应用的决定因素。本研究的目的是通过提供一个关于家庭采用数字孪生的驱动因素及其与幸福感关系的概念模型来填补这一研究空白。本研究采用混合方法进行。该模型基于文献研究以及对专家和潜在消费者访谈的关键发现进行定性构建。之后,通过对149名受访者进行问卷调查收集的数据对该模型进行了验证。结果表明,一系列信息、社会、环境和实用因素会影响采用数字孪生作为可持续能源解决方案的意愿,进而影响感知到的幸福感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f25a/10875425/3c0bc83cffb0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f25a/10875425/d6e3a07f5785/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f25a/10875425/3c0bc83cffb0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f25a/10875425/d6e3a07f5785/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f25a/10875425/3c0bc83cffb0/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Adoption of digital twins as a sustainable energy solution: Determinants to adoption in household.采用数字孪生作为可持续能源解决方案:家庭采用的决定因素。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 7;10(4):e25782. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25782. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
2
Using the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) Framework to Identify Barriers and Facilitators for the Implementation of Digital Twins in Cardiovascular Medicine.利用不采用、放弃、规模化、推广和可持续性(NASSS)框架来确定心血管医学中数字孪生实施的障碍和促进因素。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 12;23(14):6333. doi: 10.3390/s23146333.
3
Biogas adoption in Nepal: empirical evidence from a nationwide survey.尼泊尔的沼气采用情况:来自全国性调查的实证证据。
Heliyon. 2022 Aug 6;8(8):e10106. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10106. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Synergistic integration of digital twins and sustainable industrial internet of things for new generation energy investments.数字孪生与可持续工业物联网在新一代能源投资中的协同整合。
J Adv Res. 2024 Dec;66:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2023.11.023. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
5
Older Adults and New Technology: Mapping Review of the Factors Associated With Older Adults' Intention to Adopt Digital Technologies.老年人与新技术:对与老年人采用数字技术意愿相关因素的映射综述
JMIR Aging. 2023 May 16;6:e44564. doi: 10.2196/44564.
6
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Adoption of Digital Fingerprinting During Contact Investigation for Tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda: A Parallel-Convergent Mixed-Methods Analysis.乌干达坎帕拉结核病接触者调查中数字指纹识别的可行性、可接受性及采用情况:一项平行-聚合混合方法分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 15;20(11):e11541. doi: 10.2196/11541.
7
Influence of Smartphone-Based Digital Extension Service on Farmers' Sustainable Agricultural Technology Adoption in China.基于智能手机的数字延伸服务对中国农民可持续农业技术采用的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9639. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159639.
8
Sports venue digital twin technology from a spectator virtual visiting perspective.从观众虚拟参观视角看体育场馆数字孪生技术
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Dec 5;5:1289140. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1289140. eCollection 2023.
9
Drivers of digital transformation adoption: A weight and meta-analysis.数字转型采用的驱动因素:权重与荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2022 Feb 5;8(2):e08911. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08911. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Digital Health Value Realization Through Active Change Efforts.通过积极的变革努力实现数字健康的价值
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;9:741424. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.741424. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Are hybrid approaches combining EKF-UKF and artificial neural networks key to unlocking the full potential of sustainable energy technologies and reducing environmental footprint?将扩展卡尔曼滤波器-无迹卡尔曼滤波器(EKF-UKF)与人工神经网络相结合的混合方法是释放可持续能源技术全部潜力并减少环境足迹的关键吗?
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 4;10(18):e36746. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36746. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe.贸易政策、经济增长、生育率、可再生和不可再生能源消费对欧洲生态足迹的动态影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct 1;685:702-709. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139. Epub 2019 May 16.
2
The adoption of green energy technologies: The role of policies in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland.绿色能源技术的采用:政策在奥地利、德国和瑞士所起的作用。
Int J Green Energy. 2017 Oct 25;14(14):1192-1208. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2017.1381612. eCollection 2017.
3
Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience.
定性研究和内容效度:基于科学和经验制定最佳实践。
Qual Life Res. 2009 Nov;18(9):1263-78. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9. Epub 2009 Sep 27.
4
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.