Bini Christina, Hjelm Carina, Hellström Amanda, Årestedt Kristofer, Broström Anders, Sandlund Christina
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels allé 23, Huddinge, SE-141 83, Sweden.
Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, Solnavägen 1E, Stockholm, 113 65, Sweden.
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Feb 20;8(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00695-y.
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: The Consensus Sleep Diary (CSD) is widely used to assess subjective sleep. Psychometric evaluations and focus-groups support its validity and clinical usefulness, but further research into its validity is needed. The aim of the study was to evaluate a Swedish translation of the CSD regarding test content and response processes in patients with insomnia.
PATIENTS/METHODS: In connection with translating the CSD into Swedish, we used cognitive interviewing to evaluate test content and the response process, that is, how people make decisions when responding to survey items. Cognitive interviews were conducted with 13 primary health care patients with insomnia disorder (mean age, 49 years; SD 15.5). Iterative, reparative analysis was used to investigate test content. Descriptive deductive analysis was used to investigate interview transcripts for the themes of the cognitive model: comprehension, retrieval, decision process, and judgement. Together, the themes explain the response process when responding to a patient-reported outcome measure.
The overall comprehension of the CSD could be affected by poor adherence to the instructions (comprehension). Patients had difficulty with recall if they did not complete the diary immediately in the morning and just before bedtime (retrieval). They could have problems deciding how to respond to certain items because they imbued sleep-related concepts with extra meaning (decision process), and had trouble finding response alternatives nuanced enough to describe their experience of sleep and tiredness (judgement).
This study contributes knowledge on how the instrument is perceived and used by care-seeking patients with insomnia. In this context, the CSD exhibits known flaws such as memory lapses if the diary is not filled in directly in the morning. To increase the accuracy of patients' responses, therapists should support patients in reading the instructions.
目的/背景:共识睡眠日记(CSD)被广泛用于评估主观睡眠情况。心理测量评估和焦点小组支持其有效性和临床实用性,但仍需对其有效性进行进一步研究。本研究的目的是评估CSD瑞典语版本在失眠患者中的测试内容和应答过程。
患者/方法:在将CSD翻译成瑞典语的过程中,我们采用认知访谈来评估测试内容和应答过程,即人们在回答调查问卷项目时如何做出决策。对13名患有失眠症的初级医疗保健患者(平均年龄49岁;标准差15.5)进行了认知访谈。采用迭代修复性分析来研究测试内容。使用描述性演绎分析来研究访谈记录中认知模型的主题:理解、回忆、决策过程和判断。这些主题共同解释了在回答患者报告结局指标时的应答过程。
对CSD的总体理解可能会受到不严格遵守说明(理解)的影响。如果患者没有在早晨和睡前立即填写日记,回忆会有困难(回忆)。他们在决定如何回答某些项目时可能会有问题,因为他们给与睡眠相关的概念赋予了额外的含义(决策过程),并且难以找到足够细微差别来描述其睡眠和疲劳体验的应答选项(判断)。
本研究提供了关于寻求治疗的失眠患者如何理解和使用该工具的知识。在这种情况下,CSD存在一些已知缺陷,例如如果不在早晨直接填写日记会出现记忆缺失。为提高患者回答的准确性,治疗师应帮助患者阅读说明。