• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫腔镜治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。

The effectiveness of hysteroscopy for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Linhai, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 21;24(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06344-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06344-y
PMID:38383385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10880367/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a long-term complication of cesarean section characterized by the localization of a subsequent gestational sac within the scar area or niche developed as a result of a previous cesarean section. Its incidence has increased substantially because of the high global cesarean section rate in recent decades. Several surgical and drug treatments exist for this condition; however, there is currently no optimal treatment. This study compared the effectiveness of direct hysteroscopic removal of the gestational tissue and hysteroscopy combined with vacuum suction for the treatment of CSP.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2023, 521 patients were diagnosed with CSP at our hospital. Of these patients, 45 underwent hysteroscopy. Among them, 28 underwent direct hysteroscopic removal (hysteroscopic removal group) and 17 underwent hysteroscopy combined with vacuum suction (hysteroscopic suction group). The clinical characteristics and outcomes of the hysteroscopic removal group and hysteroscopic suction group were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 45 patients, the amount of bleeding and hospitalization cost were significantly higher in the hysteroscopic removal group than in the hysteroscopic suction group (33.8 mL vs. 9.9 mL, P < 0.001; and 8744.0 yuan vs. 5473.8 yuan, P < 0.001; respectively). The operation time and duration of hospitalization were significantly longer in the hysteroscopic removal group than in the hysteroscopic suction group (61.4 min vs. 28.2 min, P < 0.001; and 3.8 days vs. 2.4 days, P = 0.026; respectively). Three patients in the hysteroscopic removal group had uterine perforation and received laparoscopic repair during operation. No complications occurred in the hysteroscopic suction group. One patient in the hysteroscopic removal group received ultrasound-guided suction curettage due to postoperative moderate vaginal bleeding, and one patient in the hysteroscopic suction group received ultrasound-guided suction curettage due to postoperative gestational residue and elevated serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels. Reproductive function was preserved in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysteroscopy is an effective method for treating CSP. Compared with direct hysteroscopic removal, hysteroscopy combined with vacuum suction is more suitable for CSP. However, multicenter prospective studies with large sample sizes are required for verification of these findings.

摘要

背景

剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)是剖宫产的一种长期并发症,其特征是在下一次妊娠囊位于剖宫产瘢痕区域或由于剖宫产而形成的陷窝内。由于近几十年来全球剖宫产率较高,其发病率显著增加。对于这种情况,存在几种手术和药物治疗方法;然而,目前尚无最佳治疗方法。本研究比较了直接宫腔镜下切除妊娠组织和宫腔镜联合真空抽吸治疗 CSP 的效果。

方法

2017 年至 2023 年,我院共诊断出 521 例 CSP 患者。其中 45 例行宫腔镜检查。其中 28 例行直接宫腔镜切除(宫腔镜切除组),17 例行宫腔镜联合真空抽吸(宫腔镜抽吸组)。分析宫腔镜切除组和宫腔镜抽吸组的临床特征和结局。

结果

在 45 例患者中,宫腔镜切除组的出血量和住院费用明显高于宫腔镜抽吸组(33.8 毫升比 9.9 毫升,P<0.001;8744.0 元比 5473.8 元,P<0.001)。宫腔镜切除组的手术时间和住院时间明显长于宫腔镜抽吸组(61.4 分钟比 28.2 分钟,P<0.001;3.8 天比 2.4 天,P=0.026)。宫腔镜切除组有 3 例发生子宫穿孔,术中行腹腔镜修补术。宫腔镜抽吸组无并发症发生。宫腔镜切除组 1 例术后中等量阴道出血行超声引导下清宫术,宫腔镜抽吸组 1 例术后妊娠物残留、血清β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素水平升高行超声引导下清宫术。所有患者均保留了生殖功能。

结论

宫腔镜是治疗 CSP 的有效方法。与直接宫腔镜切除相比,宫腔镜联合真空抽吸更适用于 CSP。然而,需要进行更大样本量的多中心前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc2/10880367/dce163cc2d2e/12884_2024_6344_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc2/10880367/d1436b33c2ef/12884_2024_6344_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc2/10880367/fba3acd9202b/12884_2024_6344_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc2/10880367/dce163cc2d2e/12884_2024_6344_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc2/10880367/d1436b33c2ef/12884_2024_6344_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc2/10880367/fba3acd9202b/12884_2024_6344_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc2/10880367/dce163cc2d2e/12884_2024_6344_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of hysteroscopy for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.宫腔镜治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 21;24(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06344-y.
2
Management of persistent caesarean scar pregnancy after curettage treatment failure.刮宫治疗失败后持续性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的管理
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 1;17(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1395-4.
3
Conservative cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: local methotrexate injection followed by hysteroscopic removal with hysteroscopic tissue removal system.保守性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗:局部注射甲氨蝶呤后行宫腔镜下妊娠组织清除术。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Nov;116(5):1417-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.034. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
4
A comparison between laparoscopy and hysteroscopy approach in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.腹腔镜与宫腔镜治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22845. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022845.
5
High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.高强度聚焦超声联合刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(18):e854. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000854.
6
Hysteroscopic removal, with or without laparoscopic assistance, of first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy.经阴道或联合腹腔镜手术切除早期剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Mar;117(3):643-645. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.027.
7
[Clinical analysis on hysteroscopic surgery for the treatment of type Ⅱ cesarean scar pregnancy in the first trimester].宫腔镜手术治疗孕早期Ⅱ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床分析
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 25;52(10):669-674. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.10.005.
8
[Clinical analysis on selective uterine artery embolization combined with hysteroscopic surgery for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy in 67 cases].选择性子宫动脉栓塞联合宫腔镜手术治疗67例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床分析
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Aug;50(8):576-81.
9
The value of hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of 44 cases.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的宫腔镜治疗价值:44例报告
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;56(2):139-142. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.06.020.
10
Hysteroscopic subchorionic injection of methotrexate followed by laparoscopic excision of the gestational sac for the management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: an innovative dual approach of a challenging pathology.经阴道镜行绒毛膜下注射甲氨蝶呤,随后行腹腔镜下妊娠囊切除术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠:一种处理棘手病变的创新性双重方法。
Fertil Steril. 2024 Aug;122(2):388-390. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.04.010. Epub 2024 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Immediate Changes in the Elasticity of Tissue and the Pain Pressure Threshold in Cesarean Scar Tissue After a Vacuum Intervention: An Open Clinical Trial.真空干预后剖宫产瘢痕组织的组织弹性和疼痛压力阈值的即时变化:一项开放性临床试验。
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 21;13(3):557. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030557.

本文引用的文献

1
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #63: Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.母胎医学会咨询系列第 63 号:剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;227(3):B9-B20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.024. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
2
The efficacy of different treatments for type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy.不同治疗方法对 2 型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Aug;118(2):407-413. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.04.029. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
3
Hysteroscopic removal, with or without laparoscopic assistance, of first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy.
经阴道或联合腹腔镜手术切除早期剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Mar;117(3):643-645. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.027.
4
Hysteroscopic treatment and reproductive outcomes in cesarean scar pregnancy: experience at a single institution.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的宫腔镜治疗及生殖结局:单机构经验
Fertil Steril. 2021 Dec;116(6):1559-1566. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
5
Clinical Assessment of Ultrasound-Guided Local Lauromacrogol Injection Combined With Curettage and Hysteroscopy for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.超声引导下局部聚桂醇注射联合刮宫术及宫腔镜检查治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床评估
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Dec 21;11:601977. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.601977. eCollection 2020.
6
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Local Lauromacrogol Injection Combined with Aspiration for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Novel Treatment.超声引导下局部注射聚桂醇联合抽吸治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效评价:一种新的治疗方法。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(3):306-312. doi: 10.1159/000485099. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
The value of hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of 44 cases.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的宫腔镜治疗价值:44例报告
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;56(2):139-142. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.06.020.
8
Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:治疗研究的系统评价
Fertil Steril. 2016 Apr;105(4):958-67. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.130. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
9
Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: imaging features, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes.剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠:影像学特征、当前治疗选择及临床结局
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(7):2589-99. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0472-2.
10
Successful direct bipolar resection of 6th week cesarean scar pregnancy: case report and literature review.成功进行第六周剖宫产瘢痕妊娠直接双极切除术:病例报告与文献综述
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Aug;179:229-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.040. Epub 2014 Apr 13.