Sætre Lisa Maria Sele, Naamansen Steffi Blach, Balasubramaniam Kirubakaran, Søndergaard Jens, Jarbøl Dorte Ejg
Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
BJGP Open. 2024 Jul 29;8(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0215. Print 2024 Jul.
The number of patients who have survived cancer has increased substantially owing to improved cancer treatment. This has reinforced the need for effective strategies for follow-up cancer care in general practice.
To investigate the organisation of follow-up cancer care in Danish general practice and to analyse GPs' self-assessment of competences regarding patients who have survived cancer and late effects.
DESIGN & SETTING: A total of 500 Danish general practices were invited to a web-based survey.
Questions comprised organisation of follow-up cancer care, and GPs' self-assessment of their competences in follow-up care and evaluation of late effects. Covariates considered included sex, age, seniority, and practice type. Analyses were conducted using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models.
Some 28% of the GPs reported systematic organisation of follow-up cancer care in their clinic. More than half of the GPs assessed themselves as competent in evaluating mental sequelae, existential considerations, and the impact on comorbidities. In contrast, only 19% and 33% of GPs reported competences in sexual and physical sequelae, respectively. Female GPs were less likely to report competences regarding physical and mental sequelae as well as sexual disturbances, and GPs from partnership practices were more likely to report competence in assessing mental sequelae.
Fewer than one in three general practices have organised systematic follow-up cancer care and GPs assess their competence as low with respect to physical sequelae and sexual challenges. This emphasises the need for more systematic organisation and focus on knowledge of late effects in general practice.
由于癌症治疗水平的提高,癌症幸存者的数量大幅增加。这进一步凸显了在全科医疗中采取有效癌症后续护理策略的必要性。
调查丹麦全科医疗中癌症后续护理的组织情况,并分析全科医生对癌症幸存者及其远期影响患者的能力自我评估。
共邀请500家丹麦全科诊所参与一项基于网络的调查。
问题包括癌症后续护理的组织情况,以及全科医生对其后续护理能力和远期影响评估的自我评估。考虑的协变量包括性别、年龄、资历和诊所类型。分析采用描述性统计和多变量逻辑回归模型。
约28%的全科医生报告称其诊所有系统地组织癌症后续护理。超过一半的全科医生认为自己有能力评估心理后遗症、生存问题以及对合并症的影响。相比之下,分别只有19%和33%的全科医生报告称自己有能力处理性后遗症和身体后遗症。女全科医生报告称自己在身体和心理后遗症以及性功能障碍方面有能力的可能性较低,合伙制诊所的全科医生报告称自己有能力评估心理后遗症的可能性较高。
不到三分之一的全科诊所组织了系统的癌症后续护理,全科医生认为自己在身体后遗症和性方面的挑战方面能力较低。这强调了在全科医疗中需要更系统地组织并关注远期影响的知识。