• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区卫生工作者在医院和健康中心的协作整合,以减少儿科哮喘差异:一项质量改进计划评估。

Collaborative Integration of Community Health Workers in Hospitals and Health Centers to Reduce Pediatric Asthma Disparities: A Quality Improvement Program Evaluation.

机构信息

Urban Health Initiative, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2024 Aug;49(4):682-692. doi: 10.1007/s10900-024-01331-y. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1007/s10900-024-01331-y
PMID:38388809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11306379/
Abstract

To address pediatric asthma disparities on the South Side of Chicago, a community health worker (CHW) home visiting intervention was implemented collaboratively by academic institutions and community based health centers. This evaluation assessed the effectiveness of this longitudinal quality improvement CHW intervention in reducing asthma morbidity and healthcare utilization. All patients aged 2-18 who met the high-risk clinical criteria in outpatient settings or those who visited the ED due to asthma were offered the program. A within-subject study design analyzed asthma morbidity and healthcare utilization at baseline and follow-up. Multivariable mixed-effects regression models, adjusted for baseline demographic and asthma characteristics, were used to assess changes over time. Among 123 patients, the average age was 8.8 (4.4) years, and 89.3% were non-Hispanic black. Significant reductions were observed in the average daytime symptoms days (baseline 4.1 days and follow-up 1.6 days), night-time symptoms days (3.0 days and 1.2 days), and days requiring rescue medication (4.1 days and 1.6 days) in the past two weeks (all p < 0.001). The average number of emergency department visits decreased from 0.92 one year before to 0.44 one year after program participation, a 52% reduction (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in hospital admissions. These results support the use of a collaborative approach to implement the CHW home visiting program as part of standard care for pediatric asthma patients in urban settings. This approach has the potential to reduce asthma disparities and underscores the valuable role of CHWs within the clinical care team.

摘要

为了解决芝加哥南岸的儿科哮喘差异问题,学术机构和社区基层医疗中心合作实施了社区卫生工作者(CHW)家访干预措施。本评估旨在评估这种纵向的 CHW 质量改进干预措施在降低哮喘发病率和医疗保健利用方面的有效性。所有在门诊环境中符合高风险临床标准或因哮喘就诊急诊的 2-18 岁患者均提供该项目。采用受试者内研究设计,在基线和随访时分析哮喘发病率和医疗保健利用情况。采用多变量混合效应回归模型,根据基线人口统计学和哮喘特征进行调整,以评估随时间的变化。在 123 名患者中,平均年龄为 8.8(4.4)岁,89.3%是非西班牙裔黑人。在过去两周内,日间症状天数(基线 4.1 天,随访 1.6 天)、夜间症状天数(3.0 天和 1.2 天)和需要急救药物的天数(4.1 天和 1.6 天)均显著减少(均 P<0.001)。急诊就诊次数从项目参与前一年的 0.92 次减少到 0.44 次,减少了 52%(P<0.001)。住院人数无显著差异。这些结果支持采用协作方法实施 CHW 家访计划,作为城市环境中儿科哮喘患者标准护理的一部分。这种方法有可能减少哮喘差异,并突出了 CHW 在临床护理团队中的宝贵作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d32b/11306379/b77fcaf379c4/10900_2024_1331_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d32b/11306379/dc9a951a9a81/10900_2024_1331_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d32b/11306379/02418b3d394b/10900_2024_1331_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d32b/11306379/b77fcaf379c4/10900_2024_1331_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d32b/11306379/dc9a951a9a81/10900_2024_1331_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d32b/11306379/02418b3d394b/10900_2024_1331_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d32b/11306379/b77fcaf379c4/10900_2024_1331_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Collaborative Integration of Community Health Workers in Hospitals and Health Centers to Reduce Pediatric Asthma Disparities: A Quality Improvement Program Evaluation.社区卫生工作者在医院和健康中心的协作整合,以减少儿科哮喘差异:一项质量改进计划评估。
J Community Health. 2024 Aug;49(4):682-692. doi: 10.1007/s10900-024-01331-y. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
2
Association of an Asthma Improvement Collaborative With Health Care Utilization in Medicaid-Insured Pediatric Patients in an Urban Community.城市社区中医疗补助保险的儿科患者哮喘改善协作组织与医疗保健利用的关联
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Nov 1;171(11):1072-1080. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2600.
3
Improving asthma management among African-American children via a community health worker model: findings from a Chicago-based pilot intervention.通过社区卫生工作者模式改善非裔美国儿童的哮喘管理:基于芝加哥的试点干预结果
J Asthma. 2012 May;49(4):380-9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.660295. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
4
A community-based asthma management program: effects on resource utilization and quality of life.一项基于社区的哮喘管理项目:对资源利用和生活质量的影响。
Hawaii Med J. 2004 Apr;63(4):121-6.
5
Community Asthma Initiative: Cost Analyses using Claims Data from a Medicaid Managed Care Organization.社区哮喘倡议:使用医疗补助管理式医疗组织的理赔数据进行成本分析
J Asthma. 2020 Mar;57(3):286-294. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1565825. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
6
Results from a community-based trial testing a community health worker asthma intervention in Puerto Rican youth in Chicago.一项基于社区的试验结果,该试验在芝加哥的波多黎各青少年中测试了社区卫生工作者哮喘干预措施。
J Asthma. 2015 Feb;52(1):59-70. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.950426. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
7
Design and baseline characteristics of a low-income urban cohort of children with asthma: The Asthma Action at Erie Trial.设计和低收入城市儿童哮喘队列的基线特征:伊利哮喘行动试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Apr;79:55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Changes in blood pressure among users of lay health worker or volunteer operated community-based blood pressure programs over time: a systematic review protocol.随着时间推移,由非专业卫生工作者或志愿者运营的社区血压项目使用者的血压变化:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):30-40. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1927.
9
10
Community Health Worker Asthma Interventions for Children: Results From a Clinically Integrated Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial (2016‒2019).社区卫生工作者针对儿童的哮喘干预措施:一项临床整合的随机对照效果试验的结果(2016-2019 年)。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jul;111(7):1328-1337. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306272. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Neighborhood Opportunity, Hospitalizations, and Costs for Pediatric Asthma.儿童哮喘的社区机会、住院情况及费用趋势
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Jul;60(7):e71185. doi: 10.1002/ppul.71185.
2
CDC's National Asthma Control Program: Public Health Actions to Reduce the Burden of Asthma.美国疾病控制与预防中心的国家哮喘控制项目:减轻哮喘负担的公共卫生行动。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Sep 19;21:E73. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.240344.

本文引用的文献

1
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
2
Community Asthma Initiative: Cost Analyses using Claims Data from a Medicaid Managed Care Organization.社区哮喘倡议:使用医疗补助管理式医疗组织的理赔数据进行成本分析
J Asthma. 2020 Mar;57(3):286-294. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1565825. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
3
The Economic Burden of Pediatric Asthma in the United States: Literature Review of Current Evidence.
美国儿科哮喘的经济负担:现有证据的文献综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):155-167. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0726-2.
4
Boston children's hospital community asthma initiative: Five-year cost analyses of a home visiting program.波士顿儿童医院社区哮喘倡议:一项家访计划的五年成本分析
J Asthma. 2017 Mar;54(2):134-142. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2016.1201837. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
5
Evaluation of a Home-Based Environmental and Educational Intervention to Improve Health in Vulnerable Households: Southeastern Pennsylvania Lead and Healthy Homes Program.评估一项基于家庭的环境与教育干预措施以改善弱势家庭健康状况:宾夕法尼亚州东南部铅与健康家庭项目
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Sep 9;13(9):900. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13090900.
6
Community Asthma Initiative to Improve Health Outcomes and Reduce Disparities Among Children with Asthma.社区哮喘倡议:改善哮喘儿童的健康状况并减少差异
MMWR Suppl. 2016 Feb 12;65(1):11-20. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6501a4.
7
Community Health Worker Home Visits for Medicaid-Enrolled Children With Asthma: Effects on Asthma Outcomes and Costs.社区卫生工作者对参加医疗补助计划的哮喘儿童进行家访:对哮喘治疗效果和成本的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):2366-72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302685. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
8
The impact of an urban home-based intervention program on asthma outcomes in children.城市家庭干预方案对儿童哮喘结局的影响。
Public Health Nurs. 2014 May-Jun;31(3):243-52. doi: 10.1111/phn.12071. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
9
Effect of weatherization combined with community health worker in-home education on asthma control.天气化改造联合社区卫生工作者家庭内教育对哮喘控制的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jan;104(1):e57-64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301402. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
10
A multifaceted community-based asthma intervention in Chicago: effects of trigger reduction and self-management education on asthma morbidity.芝加哥一项基于社区的多方面哮喘干预措施:减少触发因素和自我管理教育对哮喘发病率的影响。
J Asthma. 2013 Sep;50(7):729-36. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.796971. Epub 2013 Jun 20.