CEA-Saclay/Larsim, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Sep;58(3):894-907. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09830-2. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
This article delves into the implications of neurotechnologies for the philosophical debates surrounding free will and moral responsibility. Tracing the concept from ancient religious and philosophical roots, we discuss how recent neurotechnological advancements (e.g. optogenetics, fMRI and machine learning, predictive diagnostics, et al.) challenge traditional notions of autonomy. Although neurotechnologies aim to enhance autonomy in the strict sense - as self-determination - they risk reducing or changing the broader notion of autonomy, which involves personal authenticity. We also submit that, in a world with an altered or limited concept of free will, humans should still be held accountable for actions executed through their bodies. By examining the dynamic between choice and responsibility, we emphasize the shift in technology ethics, moral philosophy, and the broader legal landscape in response to the advancement of neurotechnologies. By bringing the neurotechnological innovations into the world, neuroscientists not only change the technological landscape but also partake in long-standing moral narratives about freedom, justice, and responsibility.
本文深入探讨了神经技术对围绕自由意志和道德责任的哲学争论的影响。我们追溯了这个概念的古代宗教和哲学根源,讨论了最近的神经技术进步(例如光遗传学、功能磁共振成像和机器学习、预测诊断等)如何挑战自主性的传统观念。尽管神经技术旨在增强严格意义上的自主性——即自我决定——但它们有可能降低或改变更广泛的自主性概念,而自主性涉及个人真实性。我们还认为,在一个自由意志概念被改变或限制的世界里,人类仍应对通过其身体执行的行为负责。通过考察选择和责任之间的动态关系,我们强调了技术伦理、道德哲学以及更广泛的法律领域的转变,以应对神经技术的进步。神经科学家将神经技术创新带入世界,不仅改变了技术格局,而且参与了关于自由、正义和责任的长期道德叙事。