• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经技术、伦理学与自由意志的极限

Neurotechnologies, Ethics, and the Limits of Free Will.

机构信息

CEA-Saclay/Larsim, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Sep;58(3):894-907. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09830-2. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1007/s12124-024-09830-2
PMID:38388982
Abstract

This article delves into the implications of neurotechnologies for the philosophical debates surrounding free will and moral responsibility. Tracing the concept from ancient religious and philosophical roots, we discuss how recent neurotechnological advancements (e.g. optogenetics, fMRI and machine learning, predictive diagnostics, et al.) challenge traditional notions of autonomy. Although neurotechnologies aim to enhance autonomy in the strict sense - as self-determination - they risk reducing or changing the broader notion of autonomy, which involves personal authenticity. We also submit that, in a world with an altered or limited concept of free will, humans should still be held accountable for actions executed through their bodies. By examining the dynamic between choice and responsibility, we emphasize the shift in technology ethics, moral philosophy, and the broader legal landscape in response to the advancement of neurotechnologies. By bringing the neurotechnological innovations into the world, neuroscientists not only change the technological landscape but also partake in long-standing moral narratives about freedom, justice, and responsibility.

摘要

本文深入探讨了神经技术对围绕自由意志和道德责任的哲学争论的影响。我们追溯了这个概念的古代宗教和哲学根源,讨论了最近的神经技术进步(例如光遗传学、功能磁共振成像和机器学习、预测诊断等)如何挑战自主性的传统观念。尽管神经技术旨在增强严格意义上的自主性——即自我决定——但它们有可能降低或改变更广泛的自主性概念,而自主性涉及个人真实性。我们还认为,在一个自由意志概念被改变或限制的世界里,人类仍应对通过其身体执行的行为负责。通过考察选择和责任之间的动态关系,我们强调了技术伦理、道德哲学以及更广泛的法律领域的转变,以应对神经技术的进步。神经科学家将神经技术创新带入世界,不仅改变了技术格局,而且参与了关于自由、正义和责任的长期道德叙事。

相似文献

1
Neurotechnologies, Ethics, and the Limits of Free Will.神经技术、伦理学与自由意志的极限
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Sep;58(3):894-907. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09830-2. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
2
Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility.对自由意志和责任的神经科学挑战。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep;10(9):419-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.011. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
3
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
4
Geographies of responsibility.责任的地域分布
Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 Jan-Feb;27(1):38-44.
5
Anagogy of autonomy.自主性的神秘解释
Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth. 2000 Jul;10(4):113-9.
6
Right to mental integrity and neurotechnologies: implications of the extended mind thesis.精神完整性权利与神经技术:延伸心智论题的启示。
J Med Ethics. 2024 Sep 20;50(10):656-663. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109645.
7
Media Portrayal of a Landmark Neuroscience Experiment on Free Will.媒体对一项关于自由意志的具有里程碑意义的神经科学实验的描绘。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Aug;23(4):989-1007. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9845-3. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
8
How does the neuroscience of decision making bear on our understanding of moral responsibility and free will?决策神经科学如何影响我们对道德责任和自由意志的理解?
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):1022-6. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
9
The ethics of neuroscience and the neuroscience of ethics: a phenomenological-existential approach.神经科学伦理学与伦理学的神经科学:一种现象学-存在主义方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Sep;18(3):457-74. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9388-1. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
10
Becoming partners, retaining autonomy: ethical considerations on the development of precision medicine.成为合作伙伴,保持自主性:精准医学发展中的伦理考量
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 4;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0149-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Possibilities of Free Will in Different Physical, Social, and Technological Worlds: An Introduction to a Thematic Issue.不同物理、社会和技术世界中的自由意志的可能性:主题问题介绍。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Sep;58(3):884-893. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09843-x. Epub 2024 May 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Semantic reconstruction of continuous language from non-invasive brain recordings.从非侵入性脑记录中重建连续语言的语义。
Nat Neurosci. 2023 May;26(5):858-866. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01304-9. Epub 2023 May 1.
2
The spectrum of responsibility ascription for end users of neurotechnologies.神经技术终端用户的责任归因范围。
Neuroethics. 2021 Dec;14(3):423-435. doi: 10.1007/s12152-021-09460-0. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
3
DBS and Autonomy: Clarifying the Role of Theoretical Neuroethics.脑深部电刺激与自主性:阐明理论神经伦理学的作用。
Neuroethics. 2021 Oct;14(Suppl 1):83-93. doi: 10.1007/s12152-019-09417-4. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
4
Astrocyte Biomarkers in Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.阿尔茨海默病中的星形胶质细胞生物标志物:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neurology. 2021 Jun 14;96(24):e2944-e2955. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012109.
5
Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies.神经技术负责任开发与应用的建议。
Neuroethics. 2021;14(3):365-386. doi: 10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
6
Neurotechnologies as tools for cognitive rehabilitation in stroke patients.神经技术作为脑卒中患者认知康复的工具。
Expert Rev Neurother. 2020 Dec;20(12):1249-1261. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1820324. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
Legal liabilities of BCI-users: Responsibility gaps at the intersection of mind and machine?脑机接口用户的法律责任:心智与机器交汇点上的责任缺口?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Jul-Aug;65:101399. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
The Effects of Closed-Loop Brain Implants on Autonomy and Deliberation: What are the Risks of Being Kept in the Loop?闭环脑植入物对自主性和深思熟虑的影响:被保持在循环中会有哪些风险?
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2018 Apr;27(2):316-325. doi: 10.1017/S0963180117000640.
9
Multistage coupling of independent laser-plasma accelerators.多阶段独立激光等离子体加速器耦合。
Nature. 2016 Feb 11;530(7589):190-3. doi: 10.1038/nature16525. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
10
Thy1-expressing neurons in the basolateral amygdala may mediate fear inhibition.表达 Thy1 的神经元存在于杏仁核基底外侧核,可能介导了恐惧抑制。
J Neurosci. 2013 Jun 19;33(25):10396-404. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5539-12.2013.