Shmueli Moshe, Ben-Shimol Shalom
Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel.
Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva 8410115, Israel.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;12(1):30. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12010030.
There are three known clinical syndromes of leishmaniasis: cutaneous (CL), mucocutaneous (MCL), and visceral disease (VL). In MCL and VL, treatment must be systemic (either oral or intravenous), while CL treatment options vary and include observation-only localized/topical treatment, oral medications, or parenteral drugs. Leishmaniasis treatment is difficult, with several factors to be considered. First, the efficacy of treatments varies among different species of parasites prevalent in different areas on the globe, with each species having a unique clinical presentation and resistance profile. Furthermore, leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease (NTD), resulting in a lack of evidence-based knowledge regarding treatment. Therefore, physicians often rely on case reports or case series studies, in the absence of randomized controlled trials (RCT), to assess treatment efficacy. Second, defining cure, especially in CL and MCL, may be difficult, as death of the parasite can be achieved in most cases, while the aesthetic result (e.g., scars) is hard to predict. This is a result of the biological nature of the disease, often diagnosed late in the course of disease (with possible keloid formation, etc.). Third, physicians must consider treatment ease of use and the safety profile of possible treatments. Thus, topical or oral treatments (for CL) are desirable and promote adherence. Fourth, the cost of the treatment is an important consideration. In this review, we aim to describe the diverse treatment options for different clinical manifestations of leishmaniasis. For each currently available treatment, we will discuss the various considerations mentioned above (efficacy, ease of use, safety, and cost).
皮肤型(CL)、黏膜皮肤型(MCL)和内脏型疾病(VL)。在MCL和VL中,治疗必须是全身性的(口服或静脉注射),而CL的治疗选择则各不相同,包括仅观察的局部/局部治疗、口服药物或肠胃外药物。利什曼病的治疗很困难,有几个因素需要考虑。首先,在全球不同地区流行的不同寄生虫物种中,治疗效果各不相同,每个物种都有独特的临床表现和耐药情况。此外,利什曼病是一种被忽视的热带病(NTD),导致缺乏关于治疗的循证知识。因此,在没有随机对照试验(RCT)的情况下,医生通常依靠病例报告或病例系列研究来评估治疗效果。其次,定义治愈可能很困难,尤其是在CL和MCL中,因为在大多数情况下可以实现寄生虫的死亡,而美学效果(例如疤痕)很难预测。这是该疾病生物学特性的结果,通常在疾病过程后期才被诊断出来(可能会形成瘢痕疙瘩等)。第三,医生必须考虑治疗的易用性和可能治疗方法的安全性。因此,局部或口服治疗(用于CL)是可取的,并且有利于患者坚持治疗。第四,治疗成本也是一个重要的考虑因素。在本综述中,我们旨在描述利什曼病不同临床表现的各种治疗选择。对于每种目前可用的治疗方法,我们将讨论上述各种考虑因素(疗效、易用性、安全性和成本)。