Chivinski Jeffrey, Nathan Keren, Naeem Faheel, Ekmekjian Taline, Libman Michael D, Barkati Sapha
Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 11;10(7):ofad348. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad348. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Tegumentary leishmaniasis is often subject to limited funding, underpowered studies, and a paucity of high-quality interventional studies. Intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) has been increasingly used to treat cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis (CL and ML, respectively) despite the lack of well-conducted interventional studies. We conducted a systematic review to consolidate the descriptive evidence on the efficacy and safety of L-AmB in treating CL and ML.
Several online databases and the reference lists of included studies were searched to extract data from 132 studies comprising both case reports and case series. The population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design strategy and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used.
Of 132 studies included, 92 were case reports and 40 were case series. Of the 92 cases, 65 (82.3%) were considered cured after receiving L-AmB as part of their treatment regimen. Twenty-one of the 92 (22.8%) cases reported adverse reactions to L-AmB. A pooled cure rate of 87.0% (95% CI, 79.0%-92.0%) was reported for the 38 case series that reported on treatment efficacy; 40.7% of the cases were associated with an adverse reaction.
Observational data on cure rates using L-AmB suggest efficacy between 80% and 90%, similar to rates reported for other antileishmanial drugs. The highest efficacy rates were observed when a single cycle of L-AmB was administered to patients with mild-moderate CL and ML. The limitations of this study include the heterogeneity observed among the included studies and the increased likelihood of publication bias associated with the inclusion of case reports and case series. This systematic review further illustrates the need for high-quality comparative trials of intravenous L-AmB for the treatment of tegumentary leishmaniasis.
皮肤利什曼病的研究经费往往有限,研究力度不足,高质量的干预性研究也很匮乏。尽管缺乏充分开展的干预性研究,但静脉注射脂质体两性霉素B(L-AmB)已越来越多地用于治疗皮肤利什曼病和黏膜利什曼病(分别为CL和ML)。我们进行了一项系统评价,以整合关于L-AmB治疗CL和ML的疗效和安全性的描述性证据。
检索了多个在线数据库以及纳入研究的参考文献列表,以从132项包括病例报告和病例系列的研究中提取数据。使用了人群、干预措施、对照、结局、研究设计策略以及系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南。
在纳入的132项研究中,92项为病例报告,40项为病例系列。在92例病例中,65例(82.3%)在接受L-AmB作为治疗方案的一部分后被认为治愈。92例中的21例(22.8%)报告了对L-AmB的不良反应。报告治疗疗效的38个病例系列的汇总治愈率为87.0%(95%CI,79.0%-92.0%);40.7%的病例伴有不良反应。
使用L-AmB的治愈率观察数据表明疗效在80%至90%之间,与其他抗利什曼药物报告的治愈率相似。在轻度至中度CL和ML患者中给予单周期L-AmB时观察到最高的疗效率。本研究的局限性包括纳入研究之间观察到的异质性以及纳入病例报告和病例系列导致的发表偏倚可能性增加。这项系统评价进一步说明了需要开展高质量的静脉注射L-AmB治疗皮肤利什曼病的对照试验。