Grundfest W S, Litvack I F, Goldenberg T, Sherman T, Morgenstern L, Carroll R, Fishbein M, Forrester J, Margitan J, McDermid S
Am J Surg. 1985 Aug;150(2):220-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90124-2.
Endoscopic laser ablation of atheroma using continuous wave lasers is limited by imprecise control of thermal ablation, resulting in a crater that expands in width and depth, with thermal damage to adjacent normal tissue. We compared the gross and histologic effects of pulsed 308 mm excimer irradiation to continuous-wave Nd:YAG and Argon Ion laser irradiation, and pulsed 1,060 nm, 532 nm, 355 nm, and 266 nm laser irradiation in 205 atherosclerotic aortic segments. In contrast to the continuous-wave Nd: YAG, Argon Ion, and pulsed 1,060 nm, 532 nm, and 355 nm laser irradiation, which produced gross and histologic evidence of uncontrolled ablation, the 308 nm and 266 nm pulsed lasers induced incisions that conformed precisely to the beam configuration without gross evidence of thermal injury. The incision edges from these two lasers were histologically smooth and comparable to a scalpel incision. Our histologic findings suggest that rapid, precise endoscopic ablation of vascular and nonvascular tissue can be performed at these shorter pulsed wavelengths with very high precision with relatively little damage or risk to adjacent tissue.