• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索消费者作为癌症研究合作伙伴的参与动机和体验。

Exploring Consumers' Motivations and Experiences of Engaging as Partners in Cancer Research.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research and Implementation Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Patient. 2024 Jul;17(4):471-479. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00667-2. Epub 2024 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-023-00667-2
PMID:38401039
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11189992/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Consumer engagement improves research quality and relevance but can be difficult to implement. This study aimed to explore the motivations and understand the barriers, if any, experienced by consumers before and when partnering with cancer research teams.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with consumers and the results analysed thematically. Two groups were recruited: consumers who were members of the consumer registry and patients who did not have previous experience of being a consumer in a researcher partnership.

RESULTS

Twenty-one interviews were conducted with a total of 22 participants aged between 26 and 74 years. Consumers motivation was driven by altruism to help others and personal benefits. Barriers to beginning and maintaining consumer engagement included consumers' perceptions of being appreciated by researchers and meaningful communication between researchers and consumers.

CONCLUSIONS

Australian policy has made important steps towards consumer engagement in research. This study showed that demonstrating an appreciation for consumers and effective communication are key areas to consider when designing implementation strategies of these policies in the cancer research space in the future.

摘要

背景和目的

消费者的参与可以提高研究质量和相关性,但实施起来可能具有挑战性。本研究旨在探索消费者在与癌症研究团队合作之前和合作时的动机,并了解可能存在的障碍。

方法

对消费者进行了半结构化访谈,对结果进行了主题分析。招募了两组参与者:消费者注册中心的成员和以前没有参与过研究伙伴关系的患者。

结果

共进行了 21 次访谈,共有 22 名年龄在 26 至 74 岁之间的参与者。消费者的动机是出于帮助他人和个人利益的利他主义。开始和维持消费者参与的障碍包括消费者对研究人员的赞赏和研究人员与消费者之间的有效沟通的看法。

结论

澳大利亚的政策在消费者参与研究方面已经迈出了重要的一步。本研究表明,在未来癌症研究领域设计这些政策的实施策略时,需要考虑对消费者的赞赏和有效沟通是关键领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/986e/11189992/1620f25081d3/40271_2023_667_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/986e/11189992/1620f25081d3/40271_2023_667_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/986e/11189992/1620f25081d3/40271_2023_667_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring Consumers' Motivations and Experiences of Engaging as Partners in Cancer Research.探索消费者作为癌症研究合作伙伴的参与动机和体验。
Patient. 2024 Jul;17(4):471-479. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00667-2. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
2
The Use of Web-Based Technologies in Health Research Participation: Qualitative Study of Consumer and Researcher Experiences.基于网络技术在健康研究参与中的应用:消费者与研究者体验的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 30;20(10):e12094. doi: 10.2196/12094.
3
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
4
Consumer engagement in health services in Queensland, Australia: A qualitative study about perspectives of engaged consumers.澳大利亚昆士兰州的消费者参与健康服务:一项关于参与消费者观点的定性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):2290-2298. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13050. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
5
Consumers' perspectives on their involvement in recognizing and responding to patient deterioration-Developing a model for consumer reporting.消费者对参与识别和应对患者病情恶化的看法——开发消费者报告模型。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):385-395. doi: 10.1111/hex.12858. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
6
Patient and public involvement in preclinical and medical research: Evaluation of an established programme in a Discovery-Based Medical Research Institute.患者和公众参与临床前和医学研究:在以发现为基础的医学研究所中评估既定计划。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13968. doi: 10.1111/hex.13968.
7
Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study.探索患者及护理者对患者伴侣角色意义的认知:一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 28;9(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00511-9.
8
"Chipping away": non-consumer researcher perspectives on barriers to collaborating with consumers in mental health research.“削除”:非消费者研究人员对与精神健康研究中的消费者合作的障碍的看法。
J Ment Health. 2019 Feb;28(1):49-55. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2018.1466051. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
9
Researcher Perceptions of Involving Consumers in Health Research in Australia: A Qualitative Study.澳大利亚研究人员对消费者参与健康研究的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 9;20(10):5758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105758.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient engagement in a national research network: barriers, facilitators, and impacts.患者参与国家研究网络:障碍、促进因素及影响
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 8;9(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00418-5.
2
Adopting recommendations for implementing patient involvement in cancer research: a funder's approach.采纳关于在癌症研究中实现患者参与的建议:资助者的方法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 1;9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00410-z.
3
Measurable outcomes of consumer engagement in health research: A scoping review.消费者参与健康研究的可衡量结果:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;10:994547. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.994547. eCollection 2022.
4
Rethinking Patient Engagement in Cancer Research.重新思考患者在癌症研究中的参与度。
Patient. 2023 Mar;16(2):89-93. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00604-9. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
A snapshot of consumer engagement in clinical trials in Australia: results of a national survey of clinical trial networks and research organisations.澳大利亚消费者参与临床试验的概况:一项针对临床试验网络和研究机构的全国性调查结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 5;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00338-w.
6
Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects.消费者参与医疗政策、研究和服务:方法和效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0261808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261808. eCollection 2022.
7
Barriers and enablers to consumer and community involvement in research and healthcare improvement: Perspectives from consumer organisations, health services and researchers in Melbourne, Australia.消费者和社区参与研究和医疗保健改善的障碍和促进因素:来自澳大利亚墨尔本的消费者组织、卫生服务机构和研究人员的观点。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):e1078-e1091. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13515. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
8
Embedding consumer and community involvement within an established research centre: moving from general recommendations to an actionable framework.将消费者和社区参与融入现有研究中心:从一般性建议转向可操作的框架。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Oct 27;6:64. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00241-2. eCollection 2020.
9
Consumer engagement in health services in Queensland, Australia: A qualitative study about perspectives of engaged consumers.澳大利亚昆士兰州的消费者参与健康服务:一项关于参与消费者观点的定性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):2290-2298. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13050. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
10
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.支持患者和公众参与研究的框架:系统评价与协同设计试点
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.