• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采纳关于在癌症研究中实现患者参与的建议:资助者的方法。

Adopting recommendations for implementing patient involvement in cancer research: a funder's approach.

作者信息

Costa Alencar Alexandre B, Selig Wendy K D, Geissler Jan, Bereczky Tamás, Ubide Alba, Haerry David, Stephens Richard, Behan Valerie

机构信息

RTFCCR, Schaffhausen, Switzerland.

Rising Tide Foundation, WSCollaborative, McLean, USA.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 1;9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00410-z.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-023-00410-z
PMID:36859346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9979457/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of patients in cancer research is undergoing a significant evolution as all stakeholders seek to enhance the level of direct patient involvement in the design and development of clinical trials. However, there are significant hurdles that patients, patient advocates, laboratory researchers, clinical investigators, and funding institutions must overcome to implement relevant patient involvement in all aspects of biomedical research. By using innovative grant funding models, philanthropic organizations can lead the field in overcoming these challenges. Rising Tide Foundation for Clinical Cancer Research (RTFCCR), a private philanthropy that funds academic research, has developed a novel approach for requiring and supporting partnerships among grantees and patients in designing and conducting research projects. This paper presents a reflective case study of efforts to advance the field of patient involvement in clinical research.

METHODS

The decision to focus on patient involvement stems from an expressed focus area established by the RTFCCR board of directors. In conducting this work, RTFCCR partnered with Patvocates, a patient advocacy and engagement network, to create a set of guiding documents and resources aimed at public and private health research funders within various national, international, and therapeutic settings. This effort included a landscape assessment, interviews with experts, and an iterative development process.

RESULTS

To date, RTFCCR has completed and disseminated three guiding documents, one for funders, one for grant applicants, and one for patient advocates. These resources have already generated three major ongoing initiatives at RTFCCR: (1) inclusion of these recommendations in the foundation's funding guidelines; patient input to prioritization of research focus areas; and in topic selection for calls for proposals; (2) direct involvement of patient experts in the grant review process; and (3) a commitment to support high impact clinical research projects in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Moreover, the foundation has launched a partnership with the International Cancer Research Partnership, the global alliance of cancer research organizations.

CONCLUSION

By using its grantmaking function and developing standardized approaches for implementation of patient involvement, RTFCCR is seeking to advance patient-centric cancer clinical research. This approach will continue to develop as it is implemented and shared with partners throughout the world.

摘要

背景

随着所有利益相关者都在寻求提高患者直接参与临床试验设计与开发的程度,患者在癌症研究中的作用正在经历重大演变。然而,患者、患者权益倡导者、实验室研究人员、临床研究人员和资助机构在将相关患者参与落实到生物医学研究的各个方面时,必须克服重大障碍。通过采用创新的资助模式,慈善组织可以在克服这些挑战方面引领该领域。临床癌症研究涨潮基金会(RTFCCR)是一家为学术研究提供资金的私人慈善机构,它开发了一种新颖的方法,要求并支持受资助者与患者在设计和开展研究项目时建立伙伴关系。本文展示了一个旨在推动患者参与临床研究领域的反思性案例研究。

方法

专注于患者参与的决定源于RTFCCR董事会确定的一个明确的重点领域。在开展这项工作时,RTFCCR与患者权益倡导与参与网络Patvocates合作,为不同国家、国际和治疗环境中的公共和私人健康研究资助者创建了一套指导文件和资源。这项工作包括态势评估、专家访谈以及一个反复迭代的开发过程。

结果

迄今为止,RTFCCR已经完成并发布了三份指导文件,一份针对资助者,一份针对资助申请者,一份针对患者权益倡导者。这些资源已经在RTFCCR引发了三项主要的正在进行的倡议:(1)将这些建议纳入基金会的资助指南;患者参与研究重点领域的优先级确定以及提案征集的主题选择;(2)患者专家直接参与资助评审过程;(3)承诺支持低收入和中等收入国家的高影响力临床研究项目。此外,该基金会已与癌症研究组织全球联盟国际癌症研究伙伴关系建立了合作关系。

结论

通过利用其资助职能并开发实施患者参与的标准化方法,RTFCCR正在寻求推进以患者为中心的癌症临床研究。这种方法在实施过程中以及与世界各地的合作伙伴分享时将不断发展。

相似文献

1
Adopting recommendations for implementing patient involvement in cancer research: a funder's approach.采纳关于在癌症研究中实现患者参与的建议:资助者的方法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 1;9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00410-z.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
5
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
8
9
Bridging the divide: supporting and mentoring trainees to conceptualize, plan, and integrate engagement of people with lived experience in health research.弥合差距:支持和指导学员构思、规划并整合有生活经历者参与健康研究的相关事宜。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Aug 22;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00625-8.
10
Using qualitative Health Research methods to improve patient and public involvement and engagement in research.运用定性健康研究方法,改善患者及公众对研究的参与度。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 13;4:49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0129-8. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional differences in experiences of patients with metastatic breast cancer in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: a comparative analysis (CTRIAL-IE 23-05).爱尔兰共和国和北爱尔兰转移性乳腺癌患者经历的地区差异:一项比较分析(CTRIAL-IE 23-05)
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jul 1;14(3):e003254. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003254.
2
The MBCRC Advocate Researcher Program (MARP): connecting advocates and researchers as collaborative partners in cancer research.MBCRC 倡导者研究员计划(MARP):将倡导者和研究人员作为癌症研究中的合作伙伴联系起来。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025 Jun 21;11(1):60. doi: 10.1038/s41523-025-00771-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Developing and testing guidance to support researchers engaging patient partners in health-related research.制定并测试相关指南,以支持研究人员让患者合作伙伴参与健康相关研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 26;8(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00378-2.
2
Practices of patient engagement in drug development: a systematic scoping review.患者参与药物研发的实践:一项系统的范围综述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 29;8(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00364-8.
3
A snapshot of consumer engagement in clinical trials in Australia: results of a national survey of clinical trial networks and research organisations.
Patient research partner involvement in rheumatology research: a systematic literature review informing the 2023 updated EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners.
患者研究伙伴参与风湿病学研究:系统文献回顾为 2023 年更新的 EULAR 患者研究伙伴参与建议提供信息。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Sep 30;83(10):1268-1277. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225567.
4
Strategies for meaningful patient and public involvement in neuro-oncological research.让患者和公众切实参与神经肿瘤学研究的策略。
Neurooncol Pract. 2024 Jan 3;11(2):109-110. doi: 10.1093/nop/npad080. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Exploring Consumers' Motivations and Experiences of Engaging as Partners in Cancer Research.探索消费者作为癌症研究合作伙伴的参与动机和体验。
Patient. 2024 Jul;17(4):471-479. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00667-2. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
6
Advancing patient-centered research practices in a pragmatic patient-level randomized clinical trial: A thematic analysis of stakeholder engagement in Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access (EMPallA).在一项实用的患者层面随机临床试验中推进以患者为中心的研究实践:对急诊医学姑息治疗准入(EMPallA)中利益相关者参与情况的主题分析。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 23;10(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00539-x.
7
Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey.妇科癌症国际协作组中患者参与研究的情况:呼吁采取系统方法:一项调查结果
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e1735. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1735. eCollection 2023 Dec.
澳大利亚消费者参与临床试验的概况:一项针对临床试验网络和研究机构的全国性调查结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 5;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00338-w.
4
Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review.让利益相关者参与研究优先级设定:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 29;7(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00318-6.
5
Including the patient voice in the development and implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials.将患者声音纳入癌症临床试验中患者报告结局的制定和实施中。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):41-51. doi: 10.1111/hex.12997. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
EUPATI Guidance for Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development (R&D); Guidance for Pharmaceutical Industry-Led Medicines R&D.EUPATI患者参与药物研发(R&D)指南;制药行业主导的药物研发指南。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Oct 9;5:270. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00270. eCollection 2018.
7
EUPATI and Patients in Medicines Research and Development: Guidance for Patient Involvement in Ethical Review of Clinical Trials.欧洲患者参与药物研发组织(EUPATI)与药物研发中的患者:患者参与临床试验伦理审查的指南
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Sep 7;5:251. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00251. eCollection 2018.
8
Improving Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development:: A Practical Roadmap.提高患者在药物研发中的参与度:一份实用路线图。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Sep;51(5):612-619. doi: 10.1177/2168479017706405. Epub 2017 May 8.
9
What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: Are these expectations being met?利益相关者对患者参与有哪些期望:这些期望得到满足了吗?
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1035-1045. doi: 10.1111/hex.12797. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
10
Culture and Process Change as a Priority for Patient Engagement in Medicines Development.将文化与流程变革作为患者参与药物研发的优先事项。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Jan;51(1):29-38. doi: 10.1177/2168479016659104. Epub 2016 Aug 20.