Rosen Daniel G, de Mello Evandro Sobroza, Dhingra Sadhna, Dawsey Sanford M, Knapper Joe, Bowman Richard, Anandasabapathy Sharmila
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tx.
Department of Pathology, Michael E. DeBakey, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Houston, Tx.
Ann 3D Print Med. 2024 Feb;13. doi: 10.1016/j.stlm.2024.100145. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
In this manuscript we assessed the utility of a low-cost 3D printed microscope to evaluate esophageal biopsies. We conducted a comparative analysis between the traditional microscope and our 3-D printed microscope, utilizing a set of esophageal biopsy samples obtained from patients undergoing screening endoscopy. Two pathologists independently examined 30 esophageal biopsies by light microscopy and digital images obtained using a low-cost 3D printed microscope (Observer 1 and 2). The glass slide consensus diagnosis was compared to the findings of 2 additional pathologist who independently just reviewed the digital images (Observer 3 and 4). The intra-observer agreement was substantial to almost perfect for observer 1 (k:0.64) and 2 (k:0.84). All four observers had 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value, whereas specificity ranged from 59% to 100% and positive predictive value ranged from 21% to 100%. The PPV and specificity were lower for the two Observers (3 and 4) who just examined the digital images. Overall, our results suggest that telepathology may be used with high sensitivity and specificity, utilizing the pictures produced by our 3D-printed microscope.
在本手稿中,我们评估了低成本3D打印显微镜在评估食管活检方面的效用。我们利用从接受筛查性内镜检查的患者中获取的一组食管活检样本,对传统显微镜和我们的3D打印显微镜进行了比较分析。两位病理学家通过光学显微镜和使用低成本3D打印显微镜获得的数字图像,独立检查了30份食管活检样本(观察者1和2)。将玻片的一致诊断结果与另外两位仅独立审查数字图像的病理学家(观察者3和4)的结果进行比较。观察者1(k:0.64)和观察者2(k:0.84)的观察者内一致性从中度到几乎完美。所有四位观察者的敏感性和阴性预测值均为100%,而特异性范围为59%至100%,阳性预测值范围为21%至100%。仅检查数字图像的两位观察者(3和4)的阳性预测值和特异性较低。总体而言,我们的结果表明,利用我们的3D打印显微镜产生的图片,远程病理学可以以高敏感性和特异性使用。