Ligon B Lee, Weinstein Rachelle, Thammasitboon Satid
Baylor College of Medicine.
Texas Children's Hospital.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2017 Jul 31;6:137. doi: 10.15694/mep.2017.000137. eCollection 2017.
This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Clinician-educators often need specific direction in writing to publish their scholarly works. Faculty writing workshops and retreats, as well as helpful articles, address the "how-to" of writing but not the "pitfalls" of publishing. We describe an innovative, interactive workshop we crafted for the medical education profession, using our material from didactic presentations on writing given locally and internationally and incorporating education, rhetoric, and social science theories. Using baseball as a metaphor, we present the material in three sections: "Know the Playing Field" (publication ethics, journal selection/timing, accountability, boundaries), "Learn New Strategies" (publication standards, rhetorical statement, IMRAD), and "Score the Home Run!" (finalizing and submitting the manuscript, responding to reviewers). : It has been given in numerous venues, adapted to cover time constraints ranging from 1.5 hours to 3 hours, presented to audiences ranging from Executive Directors to medical trainees, and adjusted in response to feedback, demonstrating its flexibility. In every instance, it has been lauded for its educational value; participants have rated the overall quality of the workshop, as well as individual components, as good or excellent (all above 4 on 1-5 scale) and lessons learned as very useful and most useful. We offer it as a practical and flexible framework for adaptation by other institutions.
本文已迁移。该文章被标记为推荐文章。临床医生教育工作者在撰写学术著作时通常需要具体的指导。教师写作工作坊和静修活动以及实用的文章涉及写作的“方法”,但不涉及出版的“陷阱”。我们描述了一个为医学教育专业精心设计的创新型互动工作坊,它采用了我们在本地和国际上关于写作的教学演示材料,并融入了教育、修辞和社会科学理论。我们用棒球作比喻,将材料分为三个部分:“了解比赛场地”(出版伦理、期刊选择/时机、责任、界限)、“学习新策略”(出版标准、修辞陈述、IMRAD)和“全垒打!”(完成并提交稿件、回复审稿人)。该工作坊已在众多场合举办,根据时间限制进行了调整,时长从1.5小时到3小时不等,面向从执行董事到医学实习生的各类受众,并根据反馈进行了调整,展示了其灵活性。在每一个案例中,它因其教育价值而受到赞誉;参与者对工作坊的整体质量以及各个部分的评价都为良好或优秀(在1 - 5分的量表上均高于4分),并认为学到的经验非常有用和极其有用。我们将其作为一个实用且灵活的框架供其他机构采用。