• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人心源性休克:关注与年龄相关的风险和管理方法:美国心脏协会的科学声明。

Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults: A Focus on Age-Associated Risks and Approach to Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

出版信息

Circulation. 2024 Apr 2;149(14):e1051-e1065. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001214. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001214
PMID:38406869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11067718/
Abstract

Cardiogenic shock continues to portend poor outcomes, conferring short-term mortality rates of 30% to 50% despite recent scientific advances. Age is a nonmodifiable risk factor for mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock and is often considered in the decision-making process for eligibility for various therapies. Older adults have been largely excluded from analyses of therapeutic options in patients with cardiogenic shock. As a result, despite the association of advanced age with worse outcomes, focused strategies in the assessment and management of cardiogenic shock in this high-risk and growing population are lacking. Individual programs oftentimes develop upper age limits for various interventional strategies for their patients, including heart transplantation and durable left ventricular assist devices. However, age as a lone parameter should not be used to guide individual patient management decisions in cardiogenic shock. In the assessment of risk in older adults with cardiogenic shock, a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach is central to developing best practices. In this American Heart Association scientific statement, we aim to summarize our contemporary understanding of the epidemiology, risk assessment, and in-hospital approach to management of cardiogenic shock, with a unique focus on older adults.

摘要

心原性休克仍然预示着预后不良,尽管最近取得了科学进展,但短期死亡率仍为 30%至 50%。年龄是心原性休克患者死亡的不可改变的危险因素,在决定各种治疗方法的适用性时通常会考虑到这一点。老年人在心原性休克患者的治疗选择分析中基本上被排除在外。因此,尽管年龄较大与预后较差相关,但针对这一高风险和不断增长的人群的心原性休克评估和管理的重点策略仍然缺乏。个别项目通常为其患者制定各种介入策略的最高年龄限制,包括心脏移植和耐用性左心室辅助设备。然而,年龄作为单一参数不应用于指导心原性休克患者的个体管理决策。在心原性休克的老年患者的风险评估中,全面的跨学科方法是制定最佳实践的核心。在美国心脏协会科学声明中,我们旨在总结我们对心原性休克的流行病学、风险评估以及住院管理的当代理解,特别关注老年人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15bd/11067718/6b698fb43a3b/nihms-1983014-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15bd/11067718/00dc6804ceef/nihms-1983014-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15bd/11067718/6b698fb43a3b/nihms-1983014-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15bd/11067718/00dc6804ceef/nihms-1983014-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15bd/11067718/6b698fb43a3b/nihms-1983014-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults: A Focus on Age-Associated Risks and Approach to Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.老年人心源性休克:关注与年龄相关的风险和管理方法:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2024 Apr 2;149(14):e1051-e1065. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001214. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.当代心源性休克管理:美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):e232-e268. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
3
Escalating and De-escalating Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.在心源休克中临时机械循环支持的升级和降级:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2022 Aug 9;146(6):e50-e68. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001076. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
4
A team-based approach to patients in cardiogenic shock.一种针对心源性休克患者的团队协作方法。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;88(3):424-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26297. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
5
Selective implantation of durable left ventricular assist devices as primary therapy for refractory cardiogenic shock.选择植入耐用型左心室辅助装置作为难治性心源性休克的主要治疗方法。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Mar;155(3):1059-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.136. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
Short-term mechanical circulatory support by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the management of cardiogenic shock and end-stage heart failure.静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合用于心源性休克和终末期心力衰竭管理的短期机械循环支持
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2014 Feb;12(2):145-53. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2014.880051. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
7
Cardiogenic shock in adults with congenital heart disease: Insights from the FRENSHOCK registry.成人先天性心脏病患者的心源性休克:来自FRENSHOCK注册研究的见解。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Aug-Sep;116(8-9):390-396. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2023.06.008. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
8
Bridge to durable left ventricular assist device for refractory cardiogenic shock.桥接至耐用型左心室辅助装置治疗难治性心原性休克。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;153(4):752-762.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.085. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
9
Clinical experience with temporary right ventricular mechanical circulatory support.临时右心室机械循环支持的临床经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Nov;156(5):1885-1891. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.094. Epub 2018 May 1.
10
Door-to-VAD time: an expedient management strategy for cardiogenic shock.门到 VAD 时间:心源休克的一种权宜管理策略。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010 May;25(3):249-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiogenic Shock With Acute Myocardial Infarction Among Older Adults in the United States.美国老年人中心源性休克合并急性心肌梗死的情况
JACC Adv. 2025 Aug 19;4(9):102078. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102078.
2
The burden of cardiovascular disease in adolescents in China and globally due to sugar-sweetened beverage consumption from 1990 to 2021: results from the global burden of disease study 2021.1990年至2021年中国及全球青少年因饮用含糖饮料导致的心血管疾病负担:全球疾病负担研究2021的结果
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 15;25(1):2788. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24160-7.
3
National Trends in Admissions, Treatments, and Outcomes for Dilated Cardiomyopathy (2016-2021).

本文引用的文献

1
Geriatric Cardiology: Coming of Age.老年心脏病学:走向成熟。
JACC Adv. 2022 Aug;1(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100070. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
2
Age-related outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock stratified by etiology.按病因分层的心源性休克患者的年龄相关结局。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2023 Aug 28;20(8):555-566. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2023.08.003.
3
The 2023 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for Mechanical Circulatory Support: A 10- Year Update.《2023年国际心肺移植学会机械循环支持指南:十年更新》
扩张型心肌病的入院、治疗及预后的全国趋势(2016 - 2021年)
Med Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;13(3):83. doi: 10.3390/medsci13030083.
4
Integrative approaches in cardiac tissue engineering: Bridging cellular complexity to create accurate physiological models.心脏组织工程中的整合方法:弥合细胞复杂性以创建精确的生理模型。
iScience. 2025 Jun 25;28(8):113003. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113003. eCollection 2025 Aug 15.
5
Admission reasons, procedures, and mortality of elderly patients in CICU: the SAGE-CICU study (study on acute gaps in the elderly - cardiac intensive care unit).心脏重症监护病房老年患者的入院原因、流程及死亡率:SAGE-CICU研究(老年急性差距——心脏重症监护病房研究)
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Jul 19;37(1):224. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03108-2.
6
TAVR in older adults with cardiogenic shock: current practice and future direction.老年心源性休克患者的经导管主动脉瓣置换术:当前实践与未来方向。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2025 May 28;22(5):525-533. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.05.003.
7
Goals of care discussions among critically Ill patients on vasopressor treatment.接受血管升压药治疗的重症患者的治疗目标讨论。
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0324482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324482. eCollection 2025.
8
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with cardiogenic shock.用于预测心源性休克患者生存率的列线图的开发与验证
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 29;12:1538395. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1538395. eCollection 2025.
9
Predictors and Impact of Cardiogenic Shock in Oldest-Old ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.高龄ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者心源性休克的预测因素及影响
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 14;14(2):504. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020504.
10
Survivorship After Cardiogenic Shock.心源性休克后的生存情况
Circulation. 2025 Jan 21;151(3):257-271. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.068203.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Jul;42(7):e1-e222. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.12.004. Epub 2023 May 25.
4
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use and Risk of In-hospital Death in Heart Failure Cardiogenic Shock.肺动脉导管使用与心力衰竭性心源性休克院内死亡风险。
J Card Fail. 2023 Sep;29(9):1234-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 13.
5
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计数据-2023 更新:美国心脏协会报告》。
Circulation. 2023 Feb 21;147(8):e93-e621. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
6
Position Statement on Vascular Access Safety for Percutaneous Devices in AMI Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者经皮装置血管通路安全性立场声明
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct 24;15(20):2003-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.08.041.
7
Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Fully Magnetically Levitated vs Axial-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices in the MOMENTUM 3 Randomized Trial.在 MOMENTUM 3 随机试验中,完全磁悬浮与轴流左心室辅助装置患者的 5 年结果。
JAMA. 2022 Sep 27;328(12):1233-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.16197.
8
Criteria for Defining Stages of Cardiogenic Shock Severity.定义心源性休克严重程度分期的标准。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 19;80(3):185-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.049.
9
The landscape of cardiogenic shock: epidemiology and current definitions.心源性休克的概况:流行病学与当前定义
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022 May 1;37(3):236-240. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000957. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
10
OPTN/SRTR 2020 Annual Data Report: Heart.OPTN/SRTR 2020 年度数据报告:心脏。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Mar;22 Suppl 2:350-437. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16977.