Morales-Torres Ricardo, Egner Tobias
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Jan;51(1):14-45. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001337. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
The capacity for goal-directed behavior relies on the generation and implementation of task sets. While task sets are traditionally defined as mnemonic ensembles linking task goals to stimulus-response mappings, we here asked the question whether they may also entail information about task difficulty: does the level of focus required for performing a task become incorporated within the task set? We addressed this question by employing a cued task-switching protocol, wherein participants engaged in two intermixed tasks with trial-unique stimuli. Both tasks were equally challenging during a baseline and a transfer phase, while their difficulty was manipulated during an intermediate learning phase by varying the proportion of trials with congruent versus incongruent response mappings between the two tasks. Comparing congruency effects between the baseline and transfer phases, Experiment 1 showed that the task with a low (high) proportion of congruent trials in the learning phase displayed reduced (increased) cross-task interference effects in the transfer phase, indicating that the level of task focus required in the learning phase had become associated with each task set. Experiment 2 indicated that strengthening of task focus level in the task with a low proportion of congruent trials was the primary driver of this effect. Experiment 3 ruled out the possibility of cue-control associations mediating this effect. Taken together, our results show that task sets can become associated with the focus level required to successfully implement them, thus significantly expanding our concept of the type of information that makes up a task set. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目标导向行为的能力依赖于任务集的生成和执行。虽然任务集传统上被定义为将任务目标与刺激-反应映射联系起来的记忆集合,但我们在此提出一个问题,即它们是否也可能包含有关任务难度的信息:执行一项任务所需的专注程度是否会被纳入任务集中?我们通过采用一种线索提示的任务切换协议来解决这个问题,在该协议中,参与者参与两项相互混合的任务,且试验中的刺激是唯一的。在基线期和转换期,两项任务的挑战性相同,而在中间学习期,通过改变两项任务中一致与不一致反应映射的试验比例来操纵任务难度。通过比较基线期和转换期的一致性效应,实验1表明,在学习期具有低(高)比例一致试验的任务在转换期表现出减少(增加)的跨任务干扰效应,这表明学习期所需的任务专注程度已与每个任务集相关联。实验2表明,在一致试验比例较低的任务中,任务专注程度的增强是这种效应的主要驱动因素。实验3排除了线索控制关联介导这种效应的可能性。综合来看,我们的结果表明,任务集可以与成功执行它们所需的专注程度相关联,从而显著扩展了我们对构成任务集的信息类型的概念。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)