• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越刺激-反应规则:任务集包含有关表现难度的信息。

Beyond stimulus-response rules: Task sets incorporate information about performance difficulty.

作者信息

Morales-Torres Ricardo, Egner Tobias

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Jan;51(1):14-45. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001337. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0001337
PMID:38407129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11345883/
Abstract

The capacity for goal-directed behavior relies on the generation and implementation of task sets. While task sets are traditionally defined as mnemonic ensembles linking task goals to stimulus-response mappings, we here asked the question whether they may also entail information about task difficulty: does the level of focus required for performing a task become incorporated within the task set? We addressed this question by employing a cued task-switching protocol, wherein participants engaged in two intermixed tasks with trial-unique stimuli. Both tasks were equally challenging during a baseline and a transfer phase, while their difficulty was manipulated during an intermediate learning phase by varying the proportion of trials with congruent versus incongruent response mappings between the two tasks. Comparing congruency effects between the baseline and transfer phases, Experiment 1 showed that the task with a low (high) proportion of congruent trials in the learning phase displayed reduced (increased) cross-task interference effects in the transfer phase, indicating that the level of task focus required in the learning phase had become associated with each task set. Experiment 2 indicated that strengthening of task focus level in the task with a low proportion of congruent trials was the primary driver of this effect. Experiment 3 ruled out the possibility of cue-control associations mediating this effect. Taken together, our results show that task sets can become associated with the focus level required to successfully implement them, thus significantly expanding our concept of the type of information that makes up a task set. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目标导向行为的能力依赖于任务集的生成和执行。虽然任务集传统上被定义为将任务目标与刺激-反应映射联系起来的记忆集合,但我们在此提出一个问题,即它们是否也可能包含有关任务难度的信息:执行一项任务所需的专注程度是否会被纳入任务集中?我们通过采用一种线索提示的任务切换协议来解决这个问题,在该协议中,参与者参与两项相互混合的任务,且试验中的刺激是唯一的。在基线期和转换期,两项任务的挑战性相同,而在中间学习期,通过改变两项任务中一致与不一致反应映射的试验比例来操纵任务难度。通过比较基线期和转换期的一致性效应,实验1表明,在学习期具有低(高)比例一致试验的任务在转换期表现出减少(增加)的跨任务干扰效应,这表明学习期所需的任务专注程度已与每个任务集相关联。实验2表明,在一致试验比例较低的任务中,任务专注程度的增强是这种效应的主要驱动因素。实验3排除了线索控制关联介导这种效应的可能性。综合来看,我们的结果表明,任务集可以与成功执行它们所需的专注程度相关联,从而显著扩展了我们对构成任务集的信息类型的概念。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Beyond stimulus-response rules: Task sets incorporate information about performance difficulty.超越刺激-反应规则:任务集包含有关表现难度的信息。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Jan;51(1):14-45. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001337. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
Between-task transfer of item-specific control is replicable and extends to novel conditions.任务间项目特异性控制的迁移是可复制的,并扩展到新的条件。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Jun;50(6):535-553. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001200. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Cognitive flexibility: A distinct element of performance impairment due to sleep deprivation.认知灵活性:睡眠剥夺导致表现障碍的一个独特因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 May;126:191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
4
Both congruent and incongruent trials drive the congruency sequence effect: Novel support for an episodic retrieval view of adaptive control in the prime-probe task.一致和不一致试验均会引发一致性序列效应:对启动-探测任务中适应性控制的情景检索观点的新支持。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Feb;51(2):171-189. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001349. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
5
Contextual Adaptation of Cognitive Flexibility is driven by Task- and Item-Level Learning.情境适应性认知灵活性是由任务和项目水平的学习驱动的。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Aug;20(4):757-782. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00801-9.
6
Attentional control of response selection in task switching.任务切换中反应选择的注意控制
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Oct;41(5):1315-24. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000091. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
7
Proactive control of irrelevant task rules during cued task switching.在提示性任务切换过程中对无关任务规则进行主动控制。
Psychol Res. 2016 Sep;80(5):860-76. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0686-5. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
8
When stimulus-driven control settings compete: On the dominance of categories as cues for control.当刺激驱动的控制设置相互竞争时:论类别作为控制线索的主导地位。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Dec;44(12):1905-1932. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000580. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
9
Regulation of automatic imitation: Domain-specific versus domain-general control processes.自动模仿的调节:特定领域与一般领域的控制过程。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2025 Jan;51(1):32-49. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001282.
10
Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise.情境特定的比例一致性效应:伪装下的复合线索偶然性学习
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 May;72(5):1119-1130. doi: 10.1177/1747021818787155. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural mechanisms of domain-general inhibitory control.领域通用抑制控制的神经机制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Oct 26. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.09.008.
2
Principles of cognitive control over task focus and task switching.对任务焦点和任务切换进行认知控制的原则。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2023 Nov;2(11):702-714. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00234-4. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
3
The impact of distractor relevance on the strength and timing of cognitive control: Evidence from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.分心物相关性对认知控制的强度和时机的影响:来自δ图和扩散模型分析的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Oct;49(10):1588-1614. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001281. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
4
Transfer of learned cognitive control settings within and between tasks.任务内和任务间习得的认知控制设置的转移。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2022 Dec;196:107689. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2022.107689. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
5
Learned irrelevant stimulus-response associations and proportion congruency effect: A diffusion model account.学习无关的刺激-反应关联和比例一致性效应:一种扩散模型解释。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Aug;49(8):1218-1246. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001158. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
6
No need to choose: Independent regulation of cognitive stability and flexibility challenges the stability-flexibility trade-off.无需取舍:认知稳定性和灵活性的独立调节挑战了稳定性-灵活性权衡。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Dec;151(12):3009-3027. doi: 10.1037/xge0001241. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
The visual and semantic features that predict object memory: Concept property norms for 1,000 object images.预测物体记忆的视觉和语义特征:1000张物体图像的概念属性规范。
Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):712-731. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01130-5. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
8
Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC).动作控制中的绑定与检索(BRAC)。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 May;24(5):375-387. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
9
Memories of control: One-shot episodic learning of item-specific stimulus-control associations.控制记忆:一次性学习项目特定的刺激-控制关联的情节记忆。
Cognition. 2020 Jun;199:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104220. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
10
Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect.斯特鲁普任务中对注意的项目特异性控制:在项目特异性比例一致效应中,条件学习并不是全部原因。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Apr;48(3):426-435. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00980-y.