• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

控制记忆:一次性学习项目特定的刺激-控制关联的情节记忆。

Memories of control: One-shot episodic learning of item-specific stimulus-control associations.

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Department of Psychology, Engelbergerstrasse 41, 79085 Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Cognition. 2020 Jun;199:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104220. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104220
PMID:32065944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7507789/
Abstract

The repeated pairing of a particular stimulus with a specific cognitive control process, such as task switching, can bind the two together in memory, resulting in the formation of stimulus-control associations. These bindings are thought to guide the context-sensitive application of cognitive control, but it is not presently known whether such stimulus-control associations are only acquired through slow, incremental learning or could also be mediated by episodic memories of a single experience, so-called one-shot learning. Here, we tested this episodic control-binding hypothesis by probing whether a single co-occurrence of a stimulus and the control process of task switching would lead to significant performance benefits (reduced task switch cost) when that stimulus later re-occurred under the same as opposed to different control demands. Across three experiments, we demonstrate that item-specific stimulus-control associations can be formed based on a single exposure, providing the first strong evidence for episodic memory guidance of cognitive control.

摘要

特定刺激与特定认知控制过程(如任务切换)的反复配对可以将两者在记忆中绑定在一起,从而形成刺激-控制关联。这些绑定被认为指导了认知控制的上下文敏感应用,但目前尚不清楚这些刺激-控制关联是否仅通过缓慢的增量学习获得,或者是否也可以通过单一经验的情景记忆(所谓的一次性学习)来介导。在这里,我们通过探测当单个刺激和任务切换的控制过程再次出现时,在相同而非不同的控制需求下,这种单一的共同出现是否会导致显著的性能提升(降低任务切换成本),来检验这种情景控制绑定假说。在三个实验中,我们证明了基于单次暴露可以形成特定于项目的刺激-控制关联,为情景记忆对认知控制的指导提供了第一个有力证据。

相似文献

1
Memories of control: One-shot episodic learning of item-specific stimulus-control associations.控制记忆:一次性学习项目特定的刺激-控制关联的情节记忆。
Cognition. 2020 Jun;199:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104220. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
2
Mind wandering at encoding, but not at retrieval, disrupts one-shot stimulus-control learning.在编码时心不在焉,而不是在检索时,会破坏一次性刺激控制学习。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Oct;83(7):2968-2982. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02343-9. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
3
One-shot stimulus-control associations generalize over different stimulus viewpoints and exemplars.一次性刺激-控制关联可在不同的刺激观点和示例中泛化。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb;53(2):439-452. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01573-0. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
4
Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings.评估一次性刺激控制绑定的持久性。
J Cogn. 2022 Apr 7;5(1):26. doi: 10.5334/joc.218. eCollection 2022.
5
Stimulus novelty, task demands, and strategy use in episodic memory.情景记忆中的刺激新颖性、任务需求和策略使用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 May;74(5):872-888. doi: 10.1177/1747021820980301. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
6
Memory Transformation Enhances Reinforcement Learning in Dynamic Environments.记忆转换增强动态环境中的强化学习。
J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 30;36(48):12228-12242. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0763-16.2016.
7
Control by association: Transfer of implicitly primed attentional states across linked stimuli.通过联想进行控制:跨链接刺激物转移隐含启动的注意状态。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):617-626. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1445-6.
8
Age differences in episodic associative learning.年龄对情节性联想学习的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2018 Feb;33(1):144-157. doi: 10.1037/pag0000234.
9
The involvement of alpha oscillations in voluntary attention directed towards encoding episodic memories.alpha 振荡在指向对情景记忆进行编码的自愿注意力中的参与。
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 1;166:307-316. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.064. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
10
Uncertainty alters the balance between incremental learning and episodic memory.不确定性改变了增量学习和情景记忆之间的平衡。
Elife. 2022 Dec 2;11:e81679. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81679.

引用本文的文献

1
Principles of cognitive control over task focus and task switching.对任务焦点和任务切换进行认知控制的原则。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2023 Nov;2(11):702-714. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00234-4. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
2
Task switch costs scale with dissimilarity between task rules.任务转换代价与任务规则之间的差异成正比。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jul;153(7):1873-1886. doi: 10.1037/xge0001598. Epub 2024 May 2.
3
One-shot stimulus-control associations generalize over different stimulus viewpoints and exemplars.一次性刺激-控制关联可在不同的刺激观点和示例中泛化。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb;53(2):439-452. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01573-0. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
4
Beyond stimulus-response rules: Task sets incorporate information about performance difficulty.超越刺激-反应规则:任务集包含有关表现难度的信息。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Jan;51(1):14-45. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001337. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
5
Binding of response-independent task rules.任务无关规则的结合。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1821-1832. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02465-9. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
6
Insights into control over cognitive flexibility from studies of task-switching.从任务转换研究中洞察对认知灵活性的控制
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2024 Feb;55. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101342. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
7
Memory for abstract control states does not decay with increasing retrieval delays.对抽象控制状态的记忆不会随着检索延迟的增加而衰减。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):547-561. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01870-4. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
8
N-2 Repetition Costs in Task Switching: Task Inhibition or Interference Between Task Episodes?任务切换中的 N-2 重复成本:任务抑制还是任务阶段之间的干扰?
J Cogn. 2022 Nov 4;5(1):48. doi: 10.5334/joc.244. eCollection 2022.
9
Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings.评估一次性刺激控制绑定的持久性。
J Cogn. 2022 Apr 7;5(1):26. doi: 10.5334/joc.218. eCollection 2022.
10
Binding Error-Induced Control States.绑定错误诱导的控制状态。
J Cogn. 2022 Apr 7;5(1):24. doi: 10.5334/joc.213. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconciling cognitive-control and episodic-retrieval accounts of sequential conflict modulation: Binding of control-states into event-files.协调序列冲突调节的认知控制和情景记忆检索理论:控制状态绑定到事件文件中。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Sep;45(9):1265-1270. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000673. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Execution-based and verbal code-based stimulus-response associations: proportion manipulations reveal conflict adaptation processes in item-specific priming.基于执行的和基于言语的刺激-反应关联:比例操纵揭示了项目特异性启动中的冲突适应过程。
Psychol Res. 2020 Nov;84(8):2172-2195. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01220-3. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
3
Cortical and subcortical contributions to context-control learning.皮层和皮层下对上下文控制学习的贡献。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Apr;99:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
4
Getting a grip on cognitive flexibility.掌握认知灵活性。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;27(6):470-476. doi: 10.1177/0963721418787475. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
When stimulus-driven control settings compete: On the dominance of categories as cues for control.当刺激驱动的控制设置相互竞争时:论类别作为控制线索的主导地位。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Dec;44(12):1905-1932. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000580. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
6
Memory-guided selective attention: Single experiences with conflict have long-lasting effects on cognitive control.记忆引导的选择性注意:单次冲突体验对认知控制具有持久影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Aug;147(8):1134-1153. doi: 10.1037/xge0000431. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
Dissociation of binding and learning processes.结合与学习过程的解离
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2590-2605. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1393-7.
8
Reminders of past choices bias decisions for reward in humans.过去选择的提示会影响人类对奖励的决策。
Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 27;8:15958. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15958.
9
Reinstated episodic context guides sampling-based decisions for reward.恢复的情景语境指导基于抽样的奖励决策。
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Jul;20(7):997-1003. doi: 10.1038/nn.4573. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
10
Multiple priming instances increase the impact of practice-based but not verbal code-based stimulus-response associations.多次启动实例会增强基于练习的刺激-反应关联的影响,但不会增强基于言语编码的刺激-反应关联的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:100-109. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 13.