Suppr超能文献

在进行晶状体摘出术的小儿眼中,使用 ESCRS 在线计算器进行人工晶状体计算。

Intraocular lens calculation using the ESCRS online calculator in pediatric eyes undergoing lens extraction.

机构信息

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany .

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Jul 1;50(7):676-681. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001433.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ESCRS online calculator for intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in children undergoing lens extraction and primary IOL implantation.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

DESIGN

Retrospective, consecutive case series.

METHODS

Eyes that received phacoemulsification and IOL implantation (Acrysof SN60AT) due to congenital or juvenile cataract were included. We compared the mean prediction error (MPE), mean and median absolute prediction error (MAE, MedAE) of formulas provided by the recently introduced online calculator provided by the ESCRS with the SRK/T formula, as well as the number of eyes within ±0.5 diopters (D), ±1.0 D, ±2.0 D of target refraction. Postoperative spherical equivalent was measured by retinoscopy 4 to 12 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

60 eyes from 47 patients with a mean age of 6.5 ± 3.2 years met the inclusion criteria. Mean axial length was 22.27 ± 1.19 mm. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.25 ± 3.78 D, and mean postoperative SE was 0.69 ± 1.53 D. The MedAE was lowest in the SRK/T formula (0.56 D, ± 1.03) performed significantly better ( P = .037) than Hoffer QST and Kane, followed by BUII (0.64 D, ± 0.92), Pearl DGS (0.65 D, ± 0.94), EVO (0.69 D, ± 0.94), Hoffer QST (0.75 D, ± 0.99), and Kane (0.78 D, ± 0.99). All of those were significantly above zero ( P < .001). 41 eyes received an intraoperative optic capture (68%). When excluding eyes that did not receive intraoperative optic capture (n = 19; 32%), the MedAE was shown to be lower.

CONCLUSIONS

Using modern IOL calculation formulas provided by the ESCRS calculator provides good refractive predictability and compares for most of the formulas with the results with SRK/T. In addition, the formulas seem to anticipate the postoperative refraction better for eyes that receive a posterior optic capture.

摘要

目的

评估 ESCRS 在线计算器在接受晶状体切除术和初次人工晶状体植入术的儿童中的眼内晶状体(IOL)计算能力。

设置

德国法兰克福歌德大学眼科。

设计

回顾性连续病例系列。

方法

纳入因先天性或青少年白内障接受超声乳化白内障吸除术和 IOL 植入术(Acrysof SN60AT)的眼。我们比较了新引入的 ESCRS 在线计算器提供的公式与 SRK/T 公式的平均预测误差(MPE)、平均和中位数绝对预测误差(MAE、MedAE),以及在目标屈光度 ±0.5 屈光度(D)、±1.0 D、±2.0 D 范围内的眼数。术后 4 至 12 周通过视网膜检影术测量术后等效球镜。

结果

47 例患者的 60 只眼符合纳入标准,平均年龄为 6.5 ± 3.2 岁。平均眼轴长度为 22.27 ± 1.19mm。平均术前等效球镜(SE)为-0.25 ± 3.78 D,平均术后 SE 为 0.69 ± 1.53 D。SRK/T 公式的 MedAE 最低(0.56 D,±1.03),表现明显优于 Hoffer QST 和 Kane,其次是 BUII(0.64 D,±0.92)、Pearl DGS(0.65 D,±0.94)、EVO(0.69 D,±0.94)、Hoffer QST(0.75 D,±0.99)和 Kane(0.78 D,±0.99)。所有这些都明显大于零(P <.001)。41 只眼接受了术中光学捕捉(68%)。当排除未接受术中光学捕捉的眼(n = 19;32%)时,MedAE 显示较低。

结论

使用 ESCRS 计算器提供的现代 IOL 计算公式可提供良好的屈光预测能力,并且与 SRK/T 相比,对于大多数公式来说都是如此。此外,对于接受后光学捕捉的眼,这些公式似乎可以更好地预测术后屈光。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验