• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中分子截留和高通量血液透析膜对动态血压监测评估的血压的影响。

Effect of medium cut-off and high-flux hemodialysis membranes on blood pressure assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Cardiology, Cardios Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 2024 May;48(5):433-443. doi: 10.1111/aor.14724. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1111/aor.14724
PMID:38409907
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is one of the most critical risk factors for cardiovascular disease, which is the leading cause of death in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Medium cut-off (MCO) membrane increases the clearance of medium molecules, which could improve blood pressure (BP) control. This study aimed to compare the effect of MCO and high-flux hemodialysis membranes on BP assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).

METHODS

This is a pre-established secondary analysis of a 28-week, randomized, open-label crossover clinical trial. Patients were randomized to HD with MCO or high-flux membranes over 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period, and then switched to the alternate membrane treatment for 12 weeks. ABPM was started before the HD session and ended at least 24 h later in weeks 1, 12, 16, and 28.

RESULTS

32 patients, 59% male, with a mean age of 52.7 years, and 40% with unknown CKD etiology, were enrolled. The dialysis vintage was 8 years, and more than 70% of the patients had hypertension. Regarding 24-h BP control, morning diastolic BP showed an increase in the high-flux compared to stability in the MCO group (interaction effect, p = 0.039). The adjusted ANOVA models showed no significant difference in the morning BP levels between the groups. Considering only the period of the HD session, patients in the MCO, compared to those in the high-flux membrane group, showed greater BP stability during dialysis, characterized by smaller variation in the pre-post HD systolic and minimum systolic BP (treatment effect, p = 0.039, and p = 0.023, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

MCO membrane seems to have a beneficial effect on morning BP and favors better BP stability during HD sessions.

摘要

背景

高血压是心血管疾病最重要的危险因素之一,而心血管疾病是血液透析(HD)患者的主要死亡原因。中截留(MCO)膜可增加中分子的清除率,从而改善血压(BP)控制。本研究旨在比较 MCO 和高通量血液透析膜对动态血压监测(ABPM)评估的 BP 的影响。

方法

这是一项为期 28 周、随机、开放标签交叉临床试验的预先设定的二次分析。患者被随机分为 MCO 或高通量膜 HD 治疗 12 周,随后进行 4 周洗脱期,然后切换至另一种膜治疗 12 周。ABPM 在 HD 治疗前开始,在第 1、12、16 和 28 周至少 24 小时后结束。

结果

共纳入 32 例患者,59%为男性,平均年龄 52.7 岁,40%的病因未知,透析龄为 8 年,超过 70%的患者患有高血压。对于 24 小时 BP 控制,与 MCO 组的稳定性相比,高通量组的晨间舒张压有所增加(交互效应,p=0.039)。调整后的 ANOVA 模型显示两组间晨间 BP 水平无显著差异。仅考虑 HD 治疗期间,与高通量膜组相比,MCO 组患者在透析期间的 BP 更稳定,表现在 HD 前后收缩压和最小收缩压的变化更小(治疗效应,p=0.039 和 p=0.023)。

结论

MCO 膜似乎对晨间 BP 有有益影响,并有利于 HD 治疗期间更好的 BP 稳定性。

相似文献

1
Effect of medium cut-off and high-flux hemodialysis membranes on blood pressure assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.中分子截留和高通量血液透析膜对动态血压监测评估的血压的影响。
Artif Organs. 2024 May;48(5):433-443. doi: 10.1111/aor.14724. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
Effect of Hemodialysis with Medium Cut-Off versus High-Flux Membranes on Endothelial Function of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.中通量与高通量血液透析对慢性肾脏病患者血管内皮功能的影响。
Blood Purif. 2024;53(7):565-573. doi: 10.1159/000537679. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
Performance of hemodialysis with novel medium cut-off dialyzers.新型中截留量透析器的血液透析性能
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jan 1;32(1):165-172. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw310.
4
A Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing the Clearance of Vancomycin during Haemodialysis Using Medium Cut-Off Membrane (Theranova) and High-Flux Membranes (Revaclear).比较使用中截留分子量膜(Theranova)和高通量膜(Revaclear)进行血液透析时万古霉素清除率的药代动力学研究。
Toxins (Basel). 2020 May 12;12(5):317. doi: 10.3390/toxins12050317.
5
Dialysis unit blood pressure two hours after hemodialysis is useful for predicting home blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure in maintenance hemodialysis patients.血液透析后两小时的透析单位血压可用于预测维持性血液透析患者的家庭血压和动态血压。
Ther Apher Dial. 2022 Feb;26(1):103-114. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.13648. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
6
Home Blood Pressure monitoring: An economical, reliable, and convenient Tool over ambulatory Blood Pressure monitoring in Patients on Dialysis.家庭血压监测:透析患者中,优于动态血压监测的经济、可靠、方便的工具。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2022 Aug;70(8):11-12. doi: 10.5005/japi-11001-0069.
7
Ambulatory blood pressure profile and blood pressure variability in peritoneal dialysis compared with hemodialysis and chronic kidney disease patients.与血液透析及慢性肾脏病患者相比,腹膜透析患者的动态血压曲线及血压变异性
Hypertens Res. 2020 Sep;43(9):903-913. doi: 10.1038/s41440-020-0442-0. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
8
Blood pressure measurements and carotid intima media thickness in hemodialysis patients.血液透析患者的血压测量与颈动脉内膜中层厚度
Ther Apher Dial. 2009 Aug;13(4):288-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2009.00726.x.
9
Blood pressure assessment in haemodialysis patients: comparison between pre-dialysis blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure measurement.血液透析患者的血压评估:透析前血压与动态血压测量的比较
Nephrology (Carlton). 2009 Apr;14(3):283-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2009.01090.x.
10
Comparison of Circulating Levels of Uremic Toxins in Hemodialysis Patients Treated with Medium Cut-Off Membranes and High-Flux Membranes: Theranova in Sisli Hamidiye Etfal (THE SHE) Randomized Control Study.中通量和高通量血液透析患者血液中尿毒症毒素水平的比较:希思利哈米迪耶埃特法尔的 Theranova(THE SHE)随机对照研究。
Blood Purif. 2020;49(6):733-742. doi: 10.1159/000508061. Epub 2020 Jul 7.