• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结合全长基因检测和 SpliceAI 来解读所有可能的 SPINK1 编码变异对剪接的影响。

Combining full-length gene assay and SpliceAI to interpret the splicing impact of all possible SPINK1 coding variants.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.

Shanghai Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Hum Genomics. 2024 Feb 27;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40246-024-00586-9.

DOI:10.1186/s40246-024-00586-9
PMID:38414044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10898081/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) within gene coding sequences can significantly impact pre-mRNA splicing, bearing profound implications for pathogenic mechanisms and precision medicine. In this study, we aim to harness the well-established full-length gene splicing assay (FLGSA) in conjunction with SpliceAI to prospectively interpret the splicing effects of all potential coding SNVs within the four-exon SPINK1 gene, a gene associated with chronic pancreatitis.

RESULTS

Our study began with a retrospective analysis of 27 SPINK1 coding SNVs previously assessed using FLGSA, proceeded with a prospective analysis of 35 new FLGSA-tested SPINK1 coding SNVs, followed by data extrapolation, and ended with further validation. In total, we analyzed 67 SPINK1 coding SNVs, which account for 9.3% of the 720 possible coding SNVs. Among these 67 FLGSA-analyzed SNVs, 12 were found to impact splicing. Through detailed comparison of FLGSA results and SpliceAI predictions, we inferred that the remaining 653 untested coding SNVs in the SPINK1 gene are unlikely to significantly affect splicing. Of the 12 splice-altering events, nine produced both normally spliced and aberrantly spliced transcripts, while the remaining three only generated aberrantly spliced transcripts. These splice-impacting SNVs were found solely in exons 1 and 2, notably at the first and/or last coding nucleotides of these exons. Among the 12 splice-altering events, 11 were missense variants (2.17% of 506 potential missense variants), and one was synonymous (0.61% of 164 potential synonymous variants). Notably, adjusting the SpliceAI cut-off to 0.30 instead of the conventional 0.20 would improve specificity without reducing sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

By integrating FLGSA with SpliceAI, we have determined that less than 2% (1.67%) of all possible coding SNVs in SPINK1 significantly influence splicing outcomes. Our findings emphasize the critical importance of conducting splicing analysis within the broader genomic sequence context of the study gene and highlight the inherent uncertainties associated with intermediate SpliceAI scores (0.20 to 0.80). This study contributes to the field by being the first to prospectively interpret all potential coding SNVs in a disease-associated gene with a high degree of accuracy, representing a meaningful attempt at shifting from retrospective to prospective variant analysis in the era of exome and genome sequencing.

摘要

背景

基因编码序列中的单核苷酸变异(SNVs)可显著影响前体 mRNA 的剪接,对致病机制和精准医学具有深远意义。本研究旨在结合全长基因剪接分析(FLGSA)和 SpliceAI,前瞻性地解释与慢性胰腺炎相关的 SPINK1 基因四个外显子中所有潜在编码 SNVs 的剪接效应。

结果

我们的研究首先对 27 个先前使用 FLGSA 评估的 SPINK1 编码 SNVs 进行回顾性分析,然后对 35 个新的经过 FLGSA 测试的 SPINK1 编码 SNVs 进行前瞻性分析,接着进行数据外推,最后进行进一步验证。总共分析了 67 个 SPINK1 编码 SNVs,占 720 个可能编码 SNVs 的 9.3%。在这 67 个经过 FLGSA 分析的 SNVs 中,有 12 个被发现影响剪接。通过对 FLGSA 结果和 SpliceAI 预测的详细比较,我们推断 SPINK1 基因中其余 653 个未经测试的编码 SNVs 不太可能显著影响剪接。在 12 个影响剪接的事件中,有 9 个产生了正常剪接和异常剪接的转录本,而其余 3 个仅产生了异常剪接的转录本。这些影响剪接的 SNVs 仅存在于外显子 1 和 2 中,尤其是在外显子的第一个和/或最后一个编码核苷酸处。在这 12 个影响剪接的事件中,有 11 个是错义变异(占 506 个潜在错义变异的 2.17%),1 个是同义变异(占 164 个潜在同义变异的 0.61%)。值得注意的是,将 SpliceAI 截断值调整为 0.30 而不是传统的 0.20,在不降低敏感性的情况下可以提高特异性。

结论

通过将 FLGSA 与 SpliceAI 相结合,我们确定 SPINK1 中所有可能的编码 SNVs 中不到 2%(1.67%)显著影响剪接结果。我们的研究结果强调了在研究基因的更广泛基因组序列背景下进行剪接分析的重要性,并突出了中间 SpliceAI 分数(0.20 到 0.80)所固有的不确定性。本研究通过前瞻性地解释与疾病相关基因中所有潜在的编码 SNVs,以高度的准确性代表了从外显子和基因组测序时代的回顾性分析向前瞻性分析转变的有意义尝试,为该领域做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/5f0c6284fb65/40246_2024_586_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/baaa5631ad79/40246_2024_586_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/8e4def0ce18d/40246_2024_586_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/ad02110b8968/40246_2024_586_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/35261414cb4c/40246_2024_586_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/7097e51e753d/40246_2024_586_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/5f206b8aee8f/40246_2024_586_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/55fe300a2ff8/40246_2024_586_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/94690676de24/40246_2024_586_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/afcf99f09182/40246_2024_586_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/0105654aa099/40246_2024_586_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/5f0c6284fb65/40246_2024_586_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/baaa5631ad79/40246_2024_586_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/8e4def0ce18d/40246_2024_586_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/ad02110b8968/40246_2024_586_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/35261414cb4c/40246_2024_586_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/7097e51e753d/40246_2024_586_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/5f206b8aee8f/40246_2024_586_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/55fe300a2ff8/40246_2024_586_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/94690676de24/40246_2024_586_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/afcf99f09182/40246_2024_586_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/0105654aa099/40246_2024_586_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e719/10898081/5f0c6284fb65/40246_2024_586_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Combining full-length gene assay and SpliceAI to interpret the splicing impact of all possible SPINK1 coding variants.结合全长基因检测和 SpliceAI 来解读所有可能的 SPINK1 编码变异对剪接的影响。
Hum Genomics. 2024 Feb 27;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40246-024-00586-9.
2
Toward a clinical diagnostic pipeline for SPINK1 intronic variants.针对 SPINK1 内含子变异的临床诊断流水线方法研究。
Hum Genomics. 2019 Feb 12;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40246-019-0193-7.
3
Splicing Outcomes of 5' Splice Site GT>GC Variants That Generate Wild-Type Transcripts Differ Significantly Between Full-Length and Minigene Splicing Assays.产生野生型转录本的5'剪接位点GT>GC变体的剪接结果在全长和小基因剪接检测之间存在显著差异。
Front Genet. 2021 Aug 5;12:701652. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.701652. eCollection 2021.
4
In silico prioritization and further functional characterization of SPINK1 intronic variants.SPINK1内含子变异体的计算机优先排序及进一步功能表征
Hum Genomics. 2017 May 4;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40246-017-0103-9.
5
Combining genetic constraint with predictions of alternative splicing to prioritize deleterious splicing in rare disease studies.结合遗传约束和选择性剪接预测,优先考虑罕见病研究中的有害剪接。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 Nov 14;23(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-05041-x.
6
CI-SpliceAI-Improving machine learning predictions of disease causing splicing variants using curated alternative splice sites.CI-SpliceAI-利用已注释的可变剪接位点来改进疾病相关剪接变异体的机器学习预测。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269159. eCollection 2022.
7
Combined Bioinformatic and Splicing Analysis of Likely Benign Intronic and Synonymous Variants Reveals Evidence for Pathogenicity.对可能的良性内含子和同义变异进行联合生物信息学与剪接分析揭示了致病性证据。
medRxiv. 2023 Nov 1:2023.10.30.23297632. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.30.23297632.
8
Performance Evaluation of SpliceAI for the Prediction of Splicing of Variants.SpliceAI 预测变异剪接的性能评估。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;12(9):1308. doi: 10.3390/genes12091308.
9
Investigation of cryptic JAG1 splice variants as a cause of Alagille syndrome and performance evaluation of splice predictor tools.隐匿性 JAG1 剪接变异作为 Alagille 综合征病因的研究及剪接预测工具的性能评估。
HGG Adv. 2024 Oct 10;5(4):100351. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100351. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
10
ParSE-seq: A Calibrated Multiplexed Assay to Facilitate the Clinical Classification of Putative Splice-altering Variants.ParSE-seq:一种用于促进假定剪接改变变体临床分类的校准多重检测方法。
medRxiv. 2023 Sep 8:2023.09.04.23295019. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.04.23295019.

引用本文的文献

1
SPINK1 facilitates tumor progression via the EGFR/JAK/STAT3 axis in oral squamous cell carcinoma: insights from single-cell RNA sequencing.SPINK1通过EGFR/JAK/STAT3轴促进口腔鳞状细胞癌的肿瘤进展:来自单细胞RNA测序的见解
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 19;15:1585277. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1585277. eCollection 2025.
2
U-rich elements drive pervasive cryptic splicing in 3' UTR massively parallel reporter assays.富含尿嘧啶的元件在3'非翻译区大规模平行报告基因检测中驱动广泛的隐蔽剪接。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 25;16(1):6844. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62000-9.
3
Genetics and clinical implications of SPINK1 in the pancreatitis continuum and pancreatic cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Novel compound heterozygous ABCA2 variants cause IDPOGSA, a variable phenotypic syndrome with intellectual disability.新的复合杂合 ABCA2 变体导致 IDPOGSA,这是一种具有智力残疾的表型多变综合征。
J Hum Genet. 2024 Apr;69(3-4):163-167. doi: 10.1038/s10038-024-01219-8. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
A Deep Intronic PKHD1 Variant Identified by SpliceAI in a Deceased Neonate With Autosomal Recessive Polycystic Kidney Disease.SpliceAI 鉴定的常染色体隐性多囊肾病死亡新生儿中的深度内含子 PKHD1 变异。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Jun;83(6):829-833. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.12.011. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
Predicting the impact of rare variants on RNA splicing in CAGI6.
SPINK1在胰腺炎连续体和胰腺癌中的遗传学及临床意义
Hum Genomics. 2025 Mar 26;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00740-x.
4
Alu insertion-mediated dsRNA structure formation with pre-existing Alu elements as a disease-causing mechanism.Alu 插入介导的 dsRNA 结构形成,以前存在的 Alu 元件作为致病机制。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Oct 3;111(10):2176-2189. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.08.016. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
5
U-rich elements drive pervasive cryptic splicing in 3' UTR massively parallel reporter assays.富含U的元件在3'非翻译区大规模平行报告基因检测中驱动广泛的隐蔽剪接。
bioRxiv. 2024 Aug 5:2024.08.05.606557. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.05.606557.
预测CAGI6中罕见变异对RNA剪接的影响。
Hum Genet. 2025 Mar;144(2-3):243-251. doi: 10.1007/s00439-023-02624-3. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
4
Benchmarking splice variant prediction algorithms using massively parallel splicing assays.基于大规模并行拼接分析的剪接变异预测算法的基准测试。
Genome Biol. 2023 Dec 21;24(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-03144-z.
5
Classification of PRSS1 variants responsible for chronic pancreatitis: An expert perspective from the Franco-Chinese GREPAN study group.负责慢性胰腺炎的 PRSS1 变异分类:来自中法 GREPAN 研究组的专家观点。
Pancreatology. 2023 Aug;23(5):491-506. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
6
Frameshift coding sequence variants in the LPL gene: identification of two novel events and exploration of the genotype-phenotype relationship for variants reported to date.载脂蛋白 LPL 基因中的移码编码序列变异:两种新事件的鉴定,以及对迄今为止报道的变异的基因型-表型关系的探讨。
Lipids Health Dis. 2023 Aug 11;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12944-023-01898-w.
7
Using the ACMG/AMP framework to capture evidence related to predicted and observed impact on splicing: Recommendations from the ClinGen SVI Splicing Subgroup.使用 ACMG/AMP 框架捕捉与预测和观察到的剪接影响相关的证据:ClinGen SVI 剪接小组的建议。
Am J Hum Genet. 2023 Jul 6;110(7):1046-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
8
SpliceAI-visual: a free online tool to improve SpliceAI splicing variant interpretation.SpliceAI-visual:一个免费的在线工具,用于改善 SpliceAI 剪接变异体解释。
Hum Genomics. 2023 Feb 10;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40246-023-00451-1.
9
SpliceVault predicts the precise nature of variant-associated mis-splicing.SpliceVault 预测了变体相关的错误剪接的确切性质。
Nat Genet. 2023 Feb;55(2):324-332. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01293-8. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
10
Code inside the codon: The role of synonymous mutations in regulating splicing machinery and its impact on disease.密码子中的代码:同义突变在调节剪接机制及其对疾病影响中的作用。
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2022 Jul-Dec;790:108444. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2022.108444. Epub 2022 Oct 25.