Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Botucatu, Brasil.
Instituto de Saúde, Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Feb 26;40(2):PT099723. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT099723. eCollection 2024.
This study analyzes the main organization patterns used by primary health care (PHC) services in municipal networks and evaluates them according to indicators of local management-administration interface. Evaluative research analyzed 461 municipalities in São Paulo, Brazil, that participated in the Primary Care Services Quality Assessment Survey (QualiAB) in 2017/2018, classified according to the organizational arrangements composition of 2,472 PHC services. Eight indicators of local management and administration were selected to evaluate the identified patterns. Results indicate two groups of municipalities: homogeneous, with services presenting the same arrangement (43.6%); and heterogeneous, with different arrangements (56.4%). These were subdivided into seven patterns that ranged from homogeneous-traditional, homogeneous-Family Health Strategy, homogeneous-mixed, and different combinations in the heterogeneous group. All indicators showed significant differences between groups (p < 0.001), especially the homogeneous-traditional group, which presented an organizational pattern far from the desired model of a comprehensive and problem-solving PHC. Those integrated with family health units (FHU) and basic health units with community health workers and/or family health teams (BHU/FHU) showed a pattern closer to a comprehensive model - with planning and evaluation actions committed to the local reality and qualification of care. Implementation of federal and state policies are essential for defining the PHC health care model adopted by municipalities.
本研究分析了城市网络中基层医疗服务(PHC)主要采用的组织模式,并根据地方管理-行政界面的指标对其进行评估。评价研究分析了巴西圣保罗州 461 个参与 2017/2018 年初级保健服务质量评估调查(QualiAB)的城市,这些城市根据 2472 个 PHC 服务的组织安排构成进行了分类。选择了 8 个地方管理和行政指标来评估确定的模式。结果表明,有两组城市:同质组,其服务具有相同的安排(43.6%);异质组,其服务具有不同的安排(56.4%)。这些城市进一步细分为七种模式,从同质-传统、同质-家庭健康策略、同质-混合,到异质组中的不同组合。所有指标在组间均存在显著差异(p<0.001),特别是同质-传统组,其组织模式与综合和解决问题的 PHC 所需模式相差甚远。那些与家庭健康单位(FHU)以及配备社区卫生工作者和/或家庭健康团队的基本卫生单位(BHU/FHU)整合的模式更接近综合模式——具有规划和评估行动,致力于当地实际情况和护理质量。实施联邦和州政策对于确定城市采用的基层医疗保健模式至关重要。