Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Sep 4;36(9):e00040220. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00040220.
The essay analyzes documents produced by the Brazilian Ministry of Health in 2019 and 2020 for the reorganization of basic healthcare: the new financing policy (Previne Brasil), the Agency for the Development of Primary Healthcare (Law n. 13,958), the Services Portfolio, and complementary provisions. The objective was to understand how the projected changes in management roles and the healthcare model contribute to strengthening the public policy's mercantile logic. As parameters for the analysis, we used the management responsibilities and the principles and guidelines of the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) and basic healthcare oriented according to the social determination of the health-disease process, the expanded definition of health, territorially organized care, community focus, and coordination of care in an integrated network. Changes in the allocation of public resources, the establishment of new possibilities for relations between the State and private companies, and adjustment of the healthcare model to market management characteristics reveal the privatizing orientation of these measures. The policy assumes an individualizing focus in the model of care and financing, undercutting the territorial perspective, community work, and comprehensive and multidisciplinary care. This accelerates the reconfiguration of the SUS as a system in which public or private agents can participate indistinguishably, exacerbating the break with the constitutional commitment to health as a duty of the State.
本文分析了巴西卫生部在 2019 年和 2020 年为重组基本医疗保健而制定的文件:新的融资政策(Previne Brasil)、初级保健发展机构(第 13958 号法案)、服务组合和补充规定。目的是了解管理角色和医疗模式的预期变化如何有助于加强公共政策的商业逻辑。作为分析的参数,我们使用了管理职责以及巴西统一国家卫生系统(SUS)的原则和指导方针,以及根据卫生-疾病过程的社会决定、健康的扩展定义、有组织的领土护理、以社区为中心以及在综合网络中协调护理来定向基本医疗保健。公共资源分配的变化、国家与私营公司之间关系的新可能性的建立,以及医疗模式对市场管理特征的调整,揭示了这些措施的私有化倾向。该政策假设在护理和融资模式中关注个体,削弱了领土视角、社区工作以及全面和多学科护理。这加速了 SUS 作为一个系统的重新配置,其中公共或私营机构可以毫不区分地参与,从而加剧了与国家作为健康责任的宪法承诺的背离。