• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《亚马逊儿童长处与困难问卷的内部一致性》

Internal consistency of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Amazonian children.

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Nutrição em Saúde Pública. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Universidade NOVA de Lisboa. Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Saúde Global e Medicina Tropical. Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2024 Feb 26;57Suppl 2(Suppl 2):4s. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005562. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005562
PMID:38422333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10897965/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency of behavioral problems and the internal consistency of the parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-P) in Amazonian preschool children during the covid-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Data from the Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition in Acre (MINA-Brazil) study, a population-based birth cohort in the Western Brazilian Amazon, were used. The SDQ-P was applied in 2021 at the five-year follow-up visit to parents or caregivers of 695 children (49.4% of which were girls). This instrument is a short behavioral screening questionnaire composed of 25 items reorganized into five subscales: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior. Cases of behavioral problems were defined according to the original SDQ cut-offs based on United Kingdom norms. Moreover, cut off points were estimated based on the SDQ-P percentile results of our study sample. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient and McDonald's omega for each scale.

RESULTS

According to the cut-offs based on our studied population distribution, 10% of all children had high or very high total difficulty scores, whereas it was almost twice when the original SDQ cut-offs based on United Kingdom norms, were applied (18%). Differences were also observed in the other scales. Compared to girls, boys showed higher means of externalizing problem and lower means of prosocial behavior. The five-factor model showed a moderate internal consistency of the items for all scales (0.60 ≤ α ≤ 0.40), except for total difficulty scores, which it considered substantial (α > 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the usefulness of SDQ in our study population and reinforce the need for strategies and policy development for mental health care in early life in the Amazon.

摘要

目的

描述新冠疫情期间亚马逊地区学龄前儿童行为问题的发生频率以及家长版长处与困难问卷(SDQ-P)的内部一致性。

方法

本研究使用了 Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition in Acre(MINA-Brazil)研究的数据,该研究是巴西西部亚马逊地区的一项基于人群的出生队列研究。2021 年,在对 695 名儿童(其中 49.4%为女孩)的五年随访中,向父母或照顾者应用了 SDQ-P。该工具是一个简短的行为筛查问卷,由 25 个项目组成,重新组织成五个分量表:情绪症状、品行问题、多动/注意力不集中、同伴关系问题和亲社会行为。根据基于英国标准的原始 SDQ 截断值定义行为问题病例。此外,还根据我们研究样本的 SDQ-P 百分位结果估计了截断值。通过计算每个量表的 Cronbach's alpha 系数和 McDonald's omega 来评估内部一致性。

结果

根据基于我们研究人群分布的截断值,10%的儿童总困难得分较高或很高,而当应用基于英国标准的原始 SDQ 截断值时,这一比例几乎翻了一番(18%)。在其他量表中也观察到了差异。与女孩相比,男孩表现出更高的外化问题均值和更低的亲社会行为均值。五因素模型显示,除总困难得分外,所有量表的项目内部一致性均为中等(0.60≤α≤0.40),而总困难得分则被认为是实质性的(α>0.61)。

结论

我们的结果支持 SDQ 在我们研究人群中的有用性,并强调需要制定亚马逊地区早期生命心理健康护理的策略和政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/10897965/7c0c5ad75518/1518-8787-rsp-57-suppl2-4s-gf01-pt.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/10897965/bad2651d484b/1518-8787-rsp-57-suppl2-4s-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/10897965/7c0c5ad75518/1518-8787-rsp-57-suppl2-4s-gf01-pt.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/10897965/bad2651d484b/1518-8787-rsp-57-suppl2-4s-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc14/10897965/7c0c5ad75518/1518-8787-rsp-57-suppl2-4s-gf01-pt.jpg

相似文献

1
Internal consistency of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Amazonian children.《亚马逊儿童长处与困难问卷的内部一致性》
Rev Saude Publica. 2024 Feb 26;57Suppl 2(Suppl 2):4s. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005562. eCollection 2024.
2
Normative Data of the Self-Report Version of the German Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Epidemiological Setting.德国优势与困难问卷自陈版在流行病学背景下的常模数据。
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2018 Nov;46(6):523-533. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000589. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
Dutch norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - parent form for children aged 2-18 years.荷兰版《长处和困难问卷》(SDQ)- 家长用 2-18 岁儿童版。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 14;16(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0948-1.
4
Measuring adolescent mental health around the globe: psychometric properties of the self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in South Africa, and comparison with UK, Australian and Chinese data.全球青少年心理健康测量:南非自我报告《长处与困难问卷》的心理测量特性,以及与英国、澳大利亚和中国数据的比较。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Aug;27(4):369-380. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016001207. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
5
Exploring adolescent mental health during the COVID-19 crisis - strengths and difficulties.探讨 COVID-19 危机期间青少年心理健康:优势与困难。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 4;12:1357766. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1357766. eCollection 2024.
6
Validity and reliability of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in 5-6 year olds: differences by gender or by parental education?5-6 岁儿童长处和困难问卷的有效性和可靠性:性别或父母教育程度的差异?
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036805. Epub 2012 May 18.
7
Emotional and behavioural problems in Swedish preschool children rated by preschool teachers with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).瑞典学前儿童的情绪和行为问题,由学前教师使用长处和困难问卷(SDQ)进行评估。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Apr 21;17(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0864-2.
8
[Towards a better assessment of child and adolescent mental health status. Polish version of strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Experiences from two population studies].[迈向对儿童和青少年心理健康状况的更好评估。优势与困难问卷波兰语版。两项人群研究的经验]
Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):13-24.
9
The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: validation study in French school-aged children and cross-cultural comparisons.长处与困难问卷:针对法国学龄儿童的效度研究及跨文化比较
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;44(9):740-7. doi: 10.1007/s00127-008-0489-8. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
10
Results of the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in 22,108 primary school students from 8 provinces of China.中国8个省份22108名小学生家长评定的长处与困难问卷结果。
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;25(6):364-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2013.06.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Mina-Brasil - a birth cohort to study health and nutrition in the Amazon.米纳-巴西——一个用于研究亚马逊地区健康与营养状况的出生队列。
Rev Saude Publica. 2024 Feb 26;57Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1s. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057supl2ed.

本文引用的文献

1
SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and COVID-19 among 5 years-old Amazonian children and their association with poverty and food insecurity.五岁亚马逊儿童的 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性率和 COVID-19 及其与贫困和粮食不安全的关系。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Jul 18;16(7):e0010580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010580. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Valuable Screening Tool for Identifying Core Symptoms and Behavioural and Emotional Problems in Children with Neuropsychiatric Disorders.长处与困难问卷作为一种有价值的筛查工具,可用于识别神经精神障碍儿童的核心症状及行为和情绪问题。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7731. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137731.
3
Harsh parenting and child conduct and emotional problems: parent- and child-effects in the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort.
严厉的教养方式与儿童行为和情绪问题:2004 年佩洛塔斯出生队列中的父母和儿童效应。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Aug;31(8):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01759-w. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
Dietary diversity and mental health in preschoolers in rural China.农村学龄前儿童的饮食多样性与心理健康。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 May;24(7):1869-1876. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020003237. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
5
The Brazilian cash transfer program (Bolsa Família): A tool for reducing inequalities and achieving social rights in Brazil.巴西现金转移计划(家庭补助金计划):巴西减少不平等和实现社会权利的一项工具。
Glob Public Health. 2022 Jan;17(1):26-42. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1850828. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Stress, Resilience, and Well-Being in Italian Children and Their Parents during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间意大利儿童及其父母的压力、韧性和幸福感。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 10;17(22):8297. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228297.
7
The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child growth and development: a systematic review.COVID-19 大流行对儿童生长发育的潜在影响:系统评价。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2021 Jul-Aug;97(4):369-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
8
Early childhood suspected developmental delay in 63 low- and middle-income countries: Large within- and between-country inequalities documented using national health surveys.63 个中低收入国家的儿童早期疑似发育迟缓:利用国家健康调查记录的巨大国内和国家间不平等。
J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010427. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010427.
9
Research review: A meta-analysis of the international prevalence and comorbidity of mental disorders in children between 1 and 7 years.研究综述:1至7岁儿童精神障碍国际患病率及共病情况的荟萃分析
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;62(4):372-381. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13261. Epub 2020 May 20.
10
Cohort profile: the Maternal and Child Health and Nutrition in Acre, Brazil, birth cohort study (MINA-Brazil).队列资料简介:巴西阿克里母婴健康与营养纵向研究(MINA-Brazil)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):e034513. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034513.