Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany.
Center for Hernia Surgery and Proctology, ZweiChirurgen GmbH, St. Johanns-Vorstadt 44, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Hernia. 2021 Apr;25(2):255-265. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02319-y. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
There is an increasingly controversial debate about the best possible incisional hernia repair technique. Despite the good outcomes of laparoscopic IPOM, concerns about the intraperitoneal mesh placement and its potential intraabdominal complications have risen. Against that background, this paper now analyzes changes and trends in incisional hernia repair techniques in the recent decade.
Between 2010 and 2019 a total of 61,627 patients with primary elective incisional hernia repair were enrolled in the Herniamed Registry. The outcome results were assigned to the year of repair and summarized as curves to visualize trends. The explorative Fisher's exact test was used for statistical calculation of significant differences. Since the number of cases entered into the Herniamed Registry for the years 2010-2012 was still relatively small, the years 2013 and 2019 were compared for statistical analysis.
In the analyzed time period, the proportion of incisional hernias repaired in open suture technique remained unchanged at about 10%. The proportion of laparoscopic IPOM repairs decreased significantly from 33.8% in 2013 to 21.0% (p < 0.001) in 2019. Conversely, the proportion of open sublay repairs increased significantly from 32.1% in 2013 to 41.4% (p < 0.001) in 2019. Starting in 2015, there has also been the introduction and increasing use (4.5% in 2013 vs. 10.0% in 2019; p < 0.001) of new minimally-invasive techniques with placement of a mesh into the sublay/retromuscular/preperitoneal abdominal wall layer (E/MILOS, eTEP, preperitoneal mesh technique).
Analysis of data from the Herniamed Registry shows a significant trend to the disadvantage of the laparoscopic IPOM and to the advantage of the open sublay operation and the new minimally-invasive techniques (E/MILOS, eTEP, preperitoneal mesh technique). Despite all the recommendations in the guidelines, 10% of incisional hernias continue to be treated by means of a suture technique.
关于最佳切口疝修复技术存在着越来越多的争议。尽管腹腔镜 IPOM 有良好的结果,但对腹腔内补片放置及其潜在的腹腔内并发症的担忧有所增加。在此背景下,本文分析了近十年来切口疝修复技术的变化和趋势。
在 2010 年至 2019 年间,共有 61627 例原发性择期切口疝修补术患者被纳入 Herniamed 注册中心。将结果分配到修复年份,并总结为曲线以显示趋势。使用 Fisher 确切检验进行统计学计算显著差异。由于 2010-2012 年进入 Herniamed 注册中心的病例数量仍然相对较少,因此对 2013 年和 2019 年进行了统计学分析。
在所分析的时间段内,开放式缝合技术修复切口疝的比例保持不变,约为 10%。腹腔镜 IPOM 修复的比例从 2013 年的 33.8%显著下降到 2019 年的 21.0%(p<0.001)。相反,开放式网片修补术的比例从 2013 年的 32.1%显著增加到 2019 年的 41.4%(p<0.001)。从 2015 年开始,还引入并越来越多地使用(2013 年为 4.5%,2019 年为 10.0%;p<0.001)新的微创技术,将网片置于腹侧下/后肌膜/腹膜前腹壁层(E/MILOS、eTEP、腹膜前网片技术)。
对 Herniamed 注册中心数据的分析表明,腹腔镜 IPOM 的应用呈显著下降趋势,而开放式网片修补术和新的微创技术(E/MILOS、eTEP、腹膜前网片技术)的应用呈上升趋势。尽管指南中有所有的建议,仍有 10%的切口疝采用缝合技术治疗。