• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一名创伤患者中使用两个集成神经监测平台基于自动调节的最佳脑灌注压测定的变化

Variations in Autoregulation-Based Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Determination Using Two Integrated Neuromonitoring Platforms in a Trauma Patient.

作者信息

Plourde Guillaume, Carrier François Martin, Bijlenga Philippe, Quintard Hervé

机构信息

Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1051 Rue Sanguinet, Montreal, Canada.

Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Medicine and Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):386-392. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01949-9. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-01949-9
PMID:38424323
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neuromonitoring devices are often used in traumatic brain injury. The objective of this report is to raise awareness concerning variations in optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt) determination using exploratory information provided by two neuromonitoring monitors that are part of research programs (Moberg CNS Monitor and RAUMED NeuroSmart LogO).

METHODS

We connected both monitors simultaneously to a parenchymal intracranial pressure catheter and recorded the pressure reactivity index (PRx) and the derived CPPopt estimates for a patient with a severe traumatic brain injury. These estimates were available at the bedside and were updated at each minute.

RESULTS

Using the Bland and Altman method, we found a mean variation of - 3.8 (95% confidence internal from - 8.5 to 0.9) mm Hg between the CPPopt estimates provided by the two monitors (limits of agreement from - 26.6 to 19.1 mm Hg). The PRx and CPPopt trends provided by the two monitors were similar over time, but CPPopt trends differed when PRx values were around zero. Also, almost half of the CPPopt estimates differed by more than 10 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

These wide variations recorded in the same patient are worrisome and reiterate the importance of understanding and standardizing the methodology and algorithms behind commercial neuromonitoring devices prior to incorporating them in clinical use.

摘要

背景

神经监测设备常用于创伤性脑损伤。本报告的目的是利用两个作为研究项目一部分的神经监测仪(莫伯格中枢神经系统监测仪和RAUMED NeuroSmart LogO)提供的探索性信息,提高对最佳脑灌注压(CPPopt)测定差异的认识。

方法

我们将两个监测仪同时连接到一个实质内颅内压导管,并记录了一名重度创伤性脑损伤患者的压力反应指数(PRx)和推导的CPPopt估计值。这些估计值可在床边获取,并每分钟更新一次。

结果

使用布兰德和奥特曼方法,我们发现两个监测仪提供的CPPopt估计值之间的平均差异为-3.8(95%置信区间为-8.5至0.9)mmHg(一致性界限为-26.6至19.1 mmHg)。随着时间的推移,两个监测仪提供的PRx和CPPopt趋势相似,但当PRx值接近零时,CPPopt趋势有所不同。此外,几乎一半的CPPopt估计值差异超过10 mmHg。

结论

在同一患者中记录到的这些巨大差异令人担忧,并重申了在将商用神经监测设备纳入临床使用之前,理解和规范其背后的方法和算法的重要性。

相似文献

1
Variations in Autoregulation-Based Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Determination Using Two Integrated Neuromonitoring Platforms in a Trauma Patient.在一名创伤患者中使用两个集成神经监测平台基于自动调节的最佳脑灌注压测定的变化
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):386-392. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01949-9. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
2
Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.基于逐分钟监测数据的重型颅脑损伤患者压力自动调节监测及脑灌注压目标推荐
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
3
Can Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Be Calculated Based on Minute-by-Minute Data Monitoring?重度创伤性脑损伤患者的最佳脑灌注压能否基于逐分钟数据监测来计算?
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:245-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_49.
4
Continuous Assessment of "Optimal" Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cohort Study of Feasibility, Reliability, and Relation to Outcome.颅脑创伤中“最佳”脑灌注压的连续评估:一项可行性、可靠性及与预后相关性的队列研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Feb;30(1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0570-4.
5
Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Management at Bedside: A Single-Center Pilot Study.床边最佳脑灌注压管理:一项单中心试点研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Aug;23(1):92-102. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0103-8.
6
Further Controversies About Brain Tissue Oxygenation Pressure-Reactivity After Traumatic Brain Injury.关于创伤性脑损伤后脑组织氧合压力反应的进一步争议。
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Apr;28(2):162-168. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0438-z.
7
Monitoring of Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injured Patients Using a Multi-Window Weighting Algorithm.使用多窗口加权算法监测颅脑损伤患者的最佳脑灌注压。
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Nov 15;34(22):3081-3088. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5003. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
8
Visualisation of the 'Optimal Cerebral Perfusion' Landscape in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.重度创伤性脑损伤患者“最佳脑灌注”情况的可视化
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2018;126:55-58. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_12.
9
Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure: Targeted Treatment for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.最佳脑灌注压:重度创伤性脑损伤的靶向治疗
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jan 15;37(2):389-396. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6551. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
10
Visualization of Cerebral Pressure Autoregulatory Insults in Traumatic Brain Injury.颅脑创伤中脑压力自动调节损伤的可视化。
Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug 1;52(8):1228-1238. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006287. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic versus fixed cerebral perfusion pressure targets in paediatric traumatic brain injury: a STARSHIP analysis.小儿创伤性脑损伤中动态与固定脑灌注压目标:一项STARSHIP分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jul 17;86:103370. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103370. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Personalizing the Pressure Reactivity Index for Quantifying Cerebral Autoregulation in Neurocritical Care.个性化压力反应指数以量化神经重症监护中的脑自动调节功能
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2025 May 15;PP. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2025.3570249.
3
Unlocking the potential of high-resolution multimodality neuromonitoring for traumatic brain injury management: lessons and insights from cases, events, and patterns.

本文引用的文献

1
Autoregulatory Management in Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Absolute Pressure Reactivity Index Values and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Curve Shape.颅脑创伤的自动调节管理:绝对压力反应性指数值和最佳脑灌注压曲线形状的作用。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Nov;40(21-22):2341-2352. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0017. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
2
Towards autoregulation-oriented management after traumatic brain injury: increasing the reliability and stability of the CPPopt algorithm.朝向创伤性脑损伤后自动调节导向管理:增加 CPPopt 算法的可靠性和稳定性。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Aug;37(4):963-976. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01009-1. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
3
挖掘高分辨率多模态神经监测在创伤性脑损伤管理中的潜力:来自病例、事件及模式的经验与见解。
Crit Care. 2025 Mar 31;29(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05360-4.
4
An open source autoregulation-based neuromonitoring algorithm shows PRx and optimal CPP association with pediatric traumatic brain injury.一种基于开源自动调节的神经监测算法显示,压力反应指数(PRx)和最佳脑灌注压(CPP)与小儿创伤性脑损伤有关。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Apr;39(2):291-299. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01248-w. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
5
CPPopt on Medical Devices: The Imitation Game.医疗设备上的CPP优化:模仿游戏。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):330-331. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01977-5. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
Targeting Autoregulation-Guided Cerebral Perfusion Pressure after Traumatic Brain Injury (COGiTATE): A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
创伤性脑损伤后靶向自动调节指导脑灌注压(COGiTATE):一项可行性随机对照临床试验。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Oct 15;38(20):2790-2800. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0197. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
4
Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Monitoring in the Management of Adult Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Delphi Consensus of Clinicians.成人重型颅脑损伤管理中的脑血管自动调节监测:临床医生的德尔菲共识
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Jun;34(3):731-738. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01185-x. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
5
A management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC).成人脑氧和颅内压监测患者的管理算法:西雅图国际严重创伤性脑损伤共识会议(SIBICC)。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):919-929. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05900-x. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
6
Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: the COGiTATE phase II study protocol.采用自动评估最佳脑灌注压方法对个体化严重创伤性脑损伤管理的可行性:COGiTATE 二期研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e030727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030727.
7
Continuous Assessment of "Optimal" Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cohort Study of Feasibility, Reliability, and Relation to Outcome.颅脑创伤中“最佳”脑灌注压的连续评估:一项可行性、可靠性及与预后相关性的队列研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Feb;30(1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0570-4.
8
Occurrence of CPPopt Values in Uncorrelated ICP and ABP Time Series.不相关的颅内压(ICP)和动脉血压(ABP)时间序列中CPPopt值的出现情况。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2018;126:143-146. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_30.
9
Pressure reactivity index: journey through the past 20 years.压力反应性指数:过去20年的历程
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Nov;159(11):2063-2065. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3310-1. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
10
Individualizing Thresholds of Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Using Estimated Limits of Autoregulation.利用估计的自动调节极限个体化脑灌注压阈值
Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):1464-1471. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002575.