Suppr超能文献

在一名创伤患者中使用两个集成神经监测平台基于自动调节的最佳脑灌注压测定的变化

Variations in Autoregulation-Based Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Determination Using Two Integrated Neuromonitoring Platforms in a Trauma Patient.

作者信息

Plourde Guillaume, Carrier François Martin, Bijlenga Philippe, Quintard Hervé

机构信息

Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1051 Rue Sanguinet, Montreal, Canada.

Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Medicine and Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):386-392. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01949-9. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neuromonitoring devices are often used in traumatic brain injury. The objective of this report is to raise awareness concerning variations in optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt) determination using exploratory information provided by two neuromonitoring monitors that are part of research programs (Moberg CNS Monitor and RAUMED NeuroSmart LogO).

METHODS

We connected both monitors simultaneously to a parenchymal intracranial pressure catheter and recorded the pressure reactivity index (PRx) and the derived CPPopt estimates for a patient with a severe traumatic brain injury. These estimates were available at the bedside and were updated at each minute.

RESULTS

Using the Bland and Altman method, we found a mean variation of - 3.8 (95% confidence internal from - 8.5 to 0.9) mm Hg between the CPPopt estimates provided by the two monitors (limits of agreement from - 26.6 to 19.1 mm Hg). The PRx and CPPopt trends provided by the two monitors were similar over time, but CPPopt trends differed when PRx values were around zero. Also, almost half of the CPPopt estimates differed by more than 10 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

These wide variations recorded in the same patient are worrisome and reiterate the importance of understanding and standardizing the methodology and algorithms behind commercial neuromonitoring devices prior to incorporating them in clinical use.

摘要

背景

神经监测设备常用于创伤性脑损伤。本报告的目的是利用两个作为研究项目一部分的神经监测仪(莫伯格中枢神经系统监测仪和RAUMED NeuroSmart LogO)提供的探索性信息,提高对最佳脑灌注压(CPPopt)测定差异的认识。

方法

我们将两个监测仪同时连接到一个实质内颅内压导管,并记录了一名重度创伤性脑损伤患者的压力反应指数(PRx)和推导的CPPopt估计值。这些估计值可在床边获取,并每分钟更新一次。

结果

使用布兰德和奥特曼方法,我们发现两个监测仪提供的CPPopt估计值之间的平均差异为-3.8(95%置信区间为-8.5至0.9)mmHg(一致性界限为-26.6至19.1 mmHg)。随着时间的推移,两个监测仪提供的PRx和CPPopt趋势相似,但当PRx值接近零时,CPPopt趋势有所不同。此外,几乎一半的CPPopt估计值差异超过10 mmHg。

结论

在同一患者中记录到的这些巨大差异令人担忧,并重申了在将商用神经监测设备纳入临床使用之前,理解和规范其背后的方法和算法的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验