• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保守主义的姑息与霸权维度:制度信任在塑造对移民态度及移民政策偏好方面的缓和作用。

Palliative and hegemonic dimensions of conservatism: the mitigating role of institutional trust in shaping attitudes toward migrants and migration policy preferences.

作者信息

Grežo Matúš, Adamus Magdalena, Tencerová Jana

机构信息

Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 15;15:1308990. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1308990. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1308990
PMID:38425552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10903344/
Abstract

The study explores the links between palliative and hegemonic dimensions of conservatism, attitudes toward migrants and restrictive migration policy preferences. Participants reported on their palliative dimension (social conservatism, traditionalism) and hegemonic dimension (social dominance orientation, collective narcissism) of conservatism, trust in government, attitudes toward migrants, and restrictive migration policy preferences. The results show that both dimensions of conservatism are indirectly linked to more restrictive migration policy preferences through negative attitudes toward migrants. Moreover, the present study indicates that increasing institutional trust may be an effective mechanism mitigating negative attitudes toward migrants for individuals high in the palliative dimension of conservatism.

摘要

该研究探讨了保守主义的姑息性维度与霸权性维度、对移民的态度以及限制性移民政策偏好之间的联系。参与者报告了他们保守主义的姑息性维度(社会保守主义、传统主义)和霸权性维度(社会优势取向、集体自恋)、对政府的信任、对移民的态度以及限制性移民政策偏好。结果表明,保守主义的两个维度都通过对移民的负面态度与更具限制性的移民政策偏好间接相关。此外,本研究表明,增强制度信任可能是一种有效的机制,可减轻保守主义姑息性维度得分高的个体对移民的负面态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f3/10903344/380ea3f22010/fpsyg-15-1308990-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f3/10903344/0a938f8c35a3/fpsyg-15-1308990-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f3/10903344/6a933026c441/fpsyg-15-1308990-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f3/10903344/380ea3f22010/fpsyg-15-1308990-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f3/10903344/0a938f8c35a3/fpsyg-15-1308990-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f3/10903344/6a933026c441/fpsyg-15-1308990-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f3/10903344/380ea3f22010/fpsyg-15-1308990-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Palliative and hegemonic dimensions of conservatism: the mitigating role of institutional trust in shaping attitudes toward migrants and migration policy preferences.保守主义的姑息与霸权维度:制度信任在塑造对移民态度及移民政策偏好方面的缓和作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 15;15:1308990. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1308990. eCollection 2024.
2
Factors affecting attitudes toward migrants-An evolutionary approach.影响移民态度的因素——一种进化的方法。
Am J Hum Biol. 2021 Jan;33(1):e23435. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23435. Epub 2020 May 26.
3
Disease knowledge and attitudes during the COVID-19 epidemic among international migrants in China: a national cross-sectional study.新冠疫情期间中国国际移民的疾病知识和态度:一项全国性横断面研究。
Int J Biol Sci. 2020 Sep 4;16(15):2895-2905. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.47075. eCollection 2020.
4
Does personality "Trump" ideology? narcissism predicts support for Trump via ideological tendencies.人格特质会“胜过”意识形态吗?自恋通过意识形态倾向预测对特朗普的支持。
J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul 27:1-7. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1944035.
5
Why Do White Americans Oppose Race-Targeted Policies? Clarifying the Impact of Symbolic Racism.为什么美国白人反对种族针对性政策?澄清象征性种族主义的影响。
Polit Psychol. 2009 Oct 1;30(5):805-828. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00726.x.
6
Contemporary attitudes and their ideological representation in Flanders (Belgium), Poland, and the Ukraine.当代态度及其在佛兰德斯(比利时)、波兰和乌克兰的思想表现。
Int J Psychol. 2007 Feb;42(1):16-26. doi: 10.1080/00207590500411443.
7
Economic Attitudes, Social Attitudes and Their Psychological Underpinnings - A Study of the Finnish Political Elite.经济态度、社会态度及其心理基础——芬兰政治精英研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 19;10:602. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00602. eCollection 2019.
8
When cultures clash: Links between perceived cultural distance in values and attitudes towards migrants.当文化碰撞时:价值观和对移民的态度中感知到的文化距离之间的联系。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct;60(4):1350-1378. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12455. Epub 2021 May 9.
9
Predicting community opposition to inclusion in schools: the role of social dominance, contact, intergroup anxiety, and economic conservatism.预测社区对学校包容性的反对:社会支配地位、接触、群体间焦虑和经济保守主义的作用。
J Psychol. 2010 Mar-Apr;144(2):121-44. doi: 10.1080/00223980903472151.
10
Choosing the right policy: Factors influencing the preferences of consumption-side personal carbon reduction policies.选择正确的政策:影响消费侧个人碳减排政策偏好的因素。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 15;326(Pt B):116706. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116706. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations of political orientation, xenophobia, right-wing authoritarianism, and concern of COVID-19: Cognitive responses to an actual pathogen threat.政治倾向、仇外心理、右翼威权主义与对新冠疫情的担忧之间的关联:对实际病原体威胁的认知反应。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Nov;182:111081. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111081. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
2
Social Trust and Anti-immigrant Attitudes in Europe: A Longitudinal Multi-Level Analysis.欧洲的社会信任与反移民态度:一项纵向多层次分析
Front Sociol. 2021 Apr 9;6:604884. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.604884. eCollection 2021.
3
Social context moderates the effects of quest for significance on violent extremism.
社会环境调节了意义寻求对暴力极端主义的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jun;118(6):1165-1187. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000198. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
4
The Relationship between the Brexit Vote and Individual Predictors of Prejudice: Collective Narcissism, Right Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation.英国脱欧公投与偏见的个体预测因素之间的关系:集体自恋、右翼威权主义、社会支配取向
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 27;8:2023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02023. eCollection 2017.
5
The prejudice against asylum seekers scale: presenting the psychometric properties of a new measure of classical and conditional attitudes.对寻求庇护者的偏见量表:呈现一种新的经典和条件态度测量方法的心理测量特性。
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(6):694-710. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1404958. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
6
Extending trust to immigrants: Generalized trust, cross-group friendship and anti-immigrant sentiments in 21 European societies.将信任扩展至移民:21个欧洲社会中的普遍信任、跨群体友谊与反移民情绪
PLoS One. 2017 May 8;12(5):e0177369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177369. eCollection 2017.
7
Threatened or Threatening? How Ideology Shapes Asylum Seekers' Immigration Policy Attitudes in Israel and Australia.受威胁还是构成威胁?意识形态如何塑造以色列和澳大利亚寻求庇护者的移民政策态度。
J Refug Stud. 2016 Dec;29(4):583-606. doi: 10.1093/jrs/few012. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
8
The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.社会支配取向的本质:使用新的SDO₇量表对群体间不平等偏好进行理论化和测量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Dec;109(6):1003-28. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000033. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
9
Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility.集体自恋调节了内群体形象威胁对群体间敌意的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Jun;104(6):1019-39. doi: 10.1037/a0032215. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
10
Immigrant Integration policies and perceived Group Threat: A Multilevel Study of 27 Western and Eastern European Countries.移民融合政策与感知群体威胁:对 27 个西欧和东欧国家的多层次研究。
Soc Sci Res. 2013 May;42(3):670-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.001. Epub 2012 Dec 20.