Suppr超能文献

“透明质酸填充剂的内聚性”:使用多种内聚性测试进行评估

"Cohesiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers": Evaluation Using Multiple Cohesion Tests.

作者信息

Kim Kyun Tae, Lee Won, Yang Eun-Jung

机构信息

Yonsei Dain Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul, South Korea.

Scientific Faculty of the Minimal Invasive Plastic Surgery Association, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Arch Plast Surg. 2024 Jan 24;51(1):14-19. doi: 10.1055/a-2234-1019. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Hyaluronic acid fillers can be manufactured using various processes. They have multiple properties, including their concentration, degree of modification, and rheological data. Cohesion is one such property to evaluate gel integrity; however, there is no standardized method for calculating this parameter. This study aimed to evaluate different tests for calculating hyaluronic acid cohesion and discuss the importance of hyaluronic acid cohesion as a consideration when selecting fillers.  The cohesion levels of five different hyaluronic acid fillers with different rheological properties were evaluated and compared using the drop weight, compression, tack, and dispersion time tests.  The cohesion tests yielded different results in the samples. Samples 2 and 4 showed approximately two times the number of droplets when compared with Sample 5 in drop weight test. Samples 1, 2, 3, and 4 were superior to Sample 5 in tack test. Samples 1, 2, and 3 showed cohesive appearances at 95 seconds in most cases in dispersion test. Rheological test results did not reflect the measures of cohesion.  Although there are no definite standardized tests to evaluate the cohesion of hyaluronic acid fillers, our proposed tests showed similar results for different hyaluronic acid filler products. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cohesion of hyaluronic acid fillers and determine the clinical use of this distinguishing characteristic for clinicians selecting the product of choice. Level of evidence statement: These data are Level IV evidence.

摘要

透明质酸填充剂可通过多种工艺制造。它们具有多种特性,包括浓度、修饰程度和流变学数据。内聚力是评估凝胶完整性的此类特性之一;然而,目前尚无计算该参数的标准化方法。本研究旨在评估计算透明质酸内聚力的不同测试方法,并讨论透明质酸内聚力在选择填充剂时作为一项考量因素的重要性。

使用落锤试验、压缩试验、粘性试验和分散时间试验对五种具有不同流变学特性的不同透明质酸填充剂的内聚水平进行了评估和比较。

内聚力测试在样品中产生了不同的结果。在落锤试验中,样品2和样品4产生的液滴数量与样品5相比约为两倍。在粘性试验中,样品1、2、3和4优于样品5。在分散试验中,大多数情况下,样品1、2和3在95秒时呈现出内聚外观。流变学测试结果并未反映内聚力的测量值。

尽管目前尚无明确的标准化测试来评估透明质酸填充剂的内聚力,但我们提出的测试方法对不同的透明质酸填充剂产品显示出了相似的结果。需要进一步的研究来评估透明质酸填充剂的内聚力,并确定这一独特特性在临床医生选择首选产品时的临床应用价值。证据水平声明:这些数据为IV级证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a279/10901597/56d11a19f7cc/10-1055-a-2234-1019-i23jun0362oa-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验