Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Mar;9(3):e178-e185. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00326-2.
England implemented a menu calorie labelling policy in large, out-of-home food businesses in 2022. We aimed to model the likely policy impact on population-level obesity and cardiovascular disease mortality, as well as the socioeconomic equity of estimated effects, in the adult population in England.
For this modelling analysis, we built a comparative assessment model using two scenarios: the current implementation scenario refers to actual deployment only in large (≥250 employees), out-of-home food businesses, whereas the full implementation scenario refers to deployment in every out-of-home food business. We compared each scenario with a counterfactual: the scenario in which no intervention is implemented (ie, baseline). For both scenarios, we modelled the impact of the policy through assumed changes in energy intake due to either consumer response or product reformulation by retailers. We used data from the Office for National Statistics and the National Diet and Nutrition Survey 2009-19, and modelled the effect over 20 years (ie, 2022-41) to capture the long-term impact of the policy and provided mid-period results after 10 years. We used the Monte Carlo approach (2500 iterations) to estimate the uncertainty of model parameters. For each scenario, the model generated the change in obesity prevalence and the total number of deaths prevented or postponed.
The current implementation scenario was estimated to reduce obesity prevalence by 0·31 percentage points (absolute; 95% uncertainty interval [UI] 0·10-0·35), which would prevent or postpone 730 cardiovascular disease deaths (UI 430-1300) of the 830 000 deaths (UI 600 000-1 200 000) expected over 20 years. However, the health benefits would be increased if calorie labelling was implemented in all out-of-home food businesses (2·65 percentage points reduction in obesity prevalence [UI 1·97-3·24] and 9200 cardiovascular disease deaths prevented or postponed [UI 5500-16 000]). Results were similar in the most and the least deprived socioeconomic groups.
This study offers the first modelled estimation of the impact of the menu calorie labelling regulation on the adult population in England, although we did not include a cost-effectiveness analysis. Calorie labelling might result in a reduction in obesity prevalence and cardiovascular disease mortality without widening health inequalities. However, our results emphasise the need for the government to be more ambitious by applying this policy to all out-of-home food businesses to maximise impact.
European Research Council.
2022 年,英国在大型非家用食品企业实施了菜单卡路里标签政策。我们旨在针对英格兰成年人建立一个人口层面肥胖和心血管疾病死亡率的政策影响模型,同时还考虑了估计效果的社会经济公平性。
在这项建模分析中,我们使用两种情景构建了一个比较评估模型:现行实施情景仅指在大型(≥250 名员工)非家用食品企业中的实际部署,而全面实施情景则指在所有非家用食品企业中的部署。我们将每种情景与反事实情景进行了比较:即不实施干预的情景(即基线)。对于这两种情景,我们通过零售商的消费者反应或产品配方改变来模拟政策对能量摄入的影响。我们使用了来自国家统计局和国家饮食与营养调查 2009-19 年的数据,并在 20 年内(即 2022-41 年)进行了建模,以捕捉政策的长期影响,并在 10 年后提供了中期结果。我们使用蒙特卡罗方法(2500 次迭代)来估计模型参数的不确定性。对于每种情景,模型都生成了肥胖患病率的变化以及预防或推迟的总死亡人数。
现行实施情景预计将肥胖患病率降低 0.31 个百分点(绝对;95%置信区间[UI]为 0.10-0.35),这将预防或推迟 830000 例死亡(UI 为 430000-1300000)中的 730 例心血管疾病死亡(UI 为 600000-1200000)在 20 年内。然而,如果卡路里标签在所有非家用食品企业中实施,那么健康益处将会增加(肥胖患病率降低 2.65 个百分点[UI 为 1.97-3.24],预防或推迟 9200 例心血管疾病死亡[UI 为 5500-16000])。在最富裕和最贫困的社会经济群体中,结果是相似的。
本研究首次对菜单卡路里标签法规对英格兰成年人的影响进行了建模估计,尽管我们没有包括成本效益分析。卡路里标签可能会降低肥胖患病率和心血管疾病死亡率,而不会扩大健康不平等。然而,我们的研究结果强调,政府需要更加雄心勃勃,将这项政策应用于所有非家用食品企业,以最大限度地发挥其影响。
欧洲研究理事会。