• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多癌种早期检测试验对英国不同社会经济群体模型化死亡率获益的筛查参与度的影响。

Impact of screening participation on modelled mortality benefits of a multi-cancer early detection test by socioeconomic group in England.

机构信息

GRAIL Bio UK Ltd, a subsidiary of GRAIL, LLC, London, UK

Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 May 9;78(6):345-353. doi: 10.1136/jech-2023-220834.

DOI:10.1136/jech-2023-220834
PMID:38429085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11103338/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer burden is higher and cancer screening participation is lower among individuals living in more socioeconomically deprived areas of England, contributing to worse health outcomes and shorter life expectancy. Owing to higher multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test sensitivity for poor-prognosis cancers and greater cancer burden in groups experiencing greater deprivation, MCED screening programmes may have greater relative benefits in these groups. We modelled potential differential benefits of MCED screening between deprivation groups in England at different levels of screening participation.

METHODS

We applied the interception multi-cancer screening model to cancer incidence and survival data made available by the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service in England to estimate reductions in late-stage diagnoses and cancer mortality from an MCED screening programme by deprivation group across 24 cancer types. We assessed the impact of varying the proportion of people who participated in annual screening in each deprivation group on these estimates.

RESULTS

The modelled benefits of an MCED screening programme were substantial: reductions in late-stage diagnoses were 160 and 274 per 100 000 persons in the least and most deprived groups, respectively. Reductions in cancer mortality were 60 and 99 per 100 000 persons in the least and most deprived groups, respectively. Benefits were greatest in the most deprived group at every participation level and were attenuated with lower screening participation.

CONCLUSIONS

For the greatest possible population benefit and to decrease health inequalities, an MCED implementation strategy should focus on enhancing equitable, informed participation, enabling equal participation across all socioeconomic deprivation groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05611632.

摘要

背景

在英国,社会经济贫困地区的癌症负担更高,癌症筛查参与率更低,这导致了更差的健康结果和更短的预期寿命。由于多癌早期检测(MCED)试验对预后不良癌症的敏感性更高,以及在经历更大贫困的人群中癌症负担更大,因此 MCED 筛查计划在这些人群中可能具有更大的相对收益。我们在不同的筛查参与水平下,对英格兰不同贫困群体中 MCED 筛查的潜在差异获益进行了建模。

方法

我们应用拦截多癌筛查模型,利用英格兰国家癌症登记和分析服务提供的癌症发病率和生存率数据,来估计在 24 种癌症类型中,MCED 筛查计划按贫困程度划分,对晚期诊断和癌症死亡率的降低程度。我们评估了改变每个贫困群体中参与年度筛查的人数比例对这些估计的影响。

结果

MCED 筛查计划的模型获益是巨大的:在最贫困和最贫困的群体中,晚期诊断的减少分别为每 100000 人 160 和 274 例。癌症死亡率的减少分别为每 100000 人 60 和 99 例。在每个参与水平上,获益在最贫困群体中最大,随着筛查参与率的降低而减弱。

结论

为了获得最大的人群获益并减少健康不平等,MCED 实施策略应侧重于加强公平、知情的参与,使所有社会经济贫困群体都能平等参与。

试验注册号

NCT05611632。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ed6/11103338/32817634483c/jech-2023-220834f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ed6/11103338/3af477c649d2/jech-2023-220834f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ed6/11103338/32817634483c/jech-2023-220834f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ed6/11103338/3af477c649d2/jech-2023-220834f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ed6/11103338/32817634483c/jech-2023-220834f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of screening participation on modelled mortality benefits of a multi-cancer early detection test by socioeconomic group in England.多癌种早期检测试验对英国不同社会经济群体模型化死亡率获益的筛查参与度的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 May 9;78(6):345-353. doi: 10.1136/jech-2023-220834.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
5
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
9
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
10
Psychosocial impact associated with a multicancer early detection test (PATHFINDER): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study.与多癌早期检测测试(PATHFINDER)相关的社会心理影响:一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2025 Feb;26(2):165-174. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00645-4. Epub 2025 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming cancer screening: the potential of multi-cancer early detection (MCED) technologies.变革癌症筛查:多癌早期检测(MCED)技术的潜力
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb;30(2):180-193. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02694-5. Epub 2025 Jan 12.
2
Multicancer Early Detection Tests: A State-of-the-Art Review for Otolaryngologists.多癌早期检测测试:耳鼻咽喉科医生的最新综述
OTO Open. 2024 Oct 26;8(4):e70040. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70040. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
3
A multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test: clinical update for GPs.一种多癌早期检测(MCED)测试:全科医生的临床最新情况

本文引用的文献

1
Modelled mortality benefits of multi-cancer early detection screening in England.英格兰多癌种早期检测筛查的建模死亡率获益。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Jul;129(1):72-80. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02243-9. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
2
Cell-Free DNA-Based Multi-Cancer Early Detection Test in an Asymptomatic Screening Population (NHS-Galleri): Design of a Pragmatic, Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial.基于游离DNA的无症状筛查人群多癌早期检测试验(NHS-Galleri):一项实用、前瞻性随机对照试验的设计
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 1;14(19):4818. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194818.
3
Multi-cancer early detection tests for cancer screening: a behavioural science perspective.
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jul 25;74(745):380-382. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X739113. Print 2024 Aug.
用于癌症筛查的多癌早期检测测试:行为科学视角
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jul;23(7):837-839. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00161-9.
4
New genomic technologies for multi-cancer early detection: Rethinking the scope of cancer screening.多癌种早期检测的新型基因组技术:重新思考癌症筛查的范围。
Cancer Cell. 2022 Feb 14;40(2):109-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
5
Understanding patient factors to increase uptake of cancer screening: a review.了解影响癌症筛查参与度的患者因素:综述。
Future Oncol. 2021 Oct;17(28):3757-3775. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1078. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
6
Socioeconomic disparities in cancer incidence and mortality in England and the impact of age-at-diagnosis on cancer mortality.英格兰癌症发病率和死亡率的社会经济差异,以及诊断时年龄对癌症死亡率的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 14;16(7):e0253854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253854. eCollection 2021.
7
Clinical validation of a targeted methylation-based multi-cancer early detection test using an independent validation set.使用独立验证集对靶向甲基化的多癌种早期检测测试进行临床验证。
Ann Oncol. 2021 Sep;32(9):1167-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.806. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
8
Injection fears and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.注射恐惧和对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫。
Psychol Med. 2023 Mar;53(4):1185-1195. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721002609. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
9
Prognostic Significance of Blood-Based Multi-cancer Detection in Plasma Cell-Free DNA.基于游离血浆 DNA 的多癌种血液检测的预后意义。
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Aug 1;27(15):4221-4229. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0417. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
10
Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts.当前患者决策辅助工具中使用数字时面临的挑战:高级概念。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):834-847. doi: 10.1177/0272989X21996342. Epub 2021 Mar 4.