National Institute Of Ophthalmology, 1187/30, off Ghole road, near Phule Museum, 411005, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Aditya Jyot eye hospital, Mumbai, India.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03361-5.
Performing a surgical task subjects the surgeon to multitudinal stressors, especially with the newer 3D technology. The quantum of cognitive workload using this modern surgical system in comparison to the Conventional microscope system remains unexplored. We evaluate the surgeon's cognitive workload and the surgical outcomes of macular hole(MH) surgery performed on a 3D versus a Conventional microscope operating system.
50 eyes of 50 patients with MH undergoing surgery using the 3D or Conventional microscope visualization system. Cognitive workload assessment was done by real-time tools(Surgeons' heart rate [HR] and oxygen saturation[SPO2]) and self-report tool(Surgery Task Load Index[SURG-TLX] questionnaire) of three Vitreoretinal surgeons. Based on the SURG-TLX questionnaire, an assessment of the workload was performed.
Of the 50 eyes, 30 eyes and 20 eyes underwent surgery with the Conventional microscope and the 3D system, respectively. No difference was noted in the MH basal-diameter(p = 0.128), total surgical-duration(p = 0.299), internal-limiting membrane(ILM) peel time(p = 0.682), and the final visual acuity (VA; p = 0.515) between the two groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in VA(p < 0.001) with a 90% closure rate at one-month post-surgery. Cognitive workload comparison, the intraoperative HR(p = 0.024), total workload score(P = 0.005), and temporal-demand dimension(p = 0.004) were significantly more in Conventional microscope group as compared to 3D group. In both the groups, the HR increased significantly from the baseline while performing ILM peeling and at the end.
The surgeon's cognitive workload is markedly reduced while performing macular hole surgery with a 3D viewing system. Moreover, duration of surgery including ILM peel time, MH closure rates, and visual outcomes remains unaffected irrespective of the operating microscope system.
进行外科手术会使外科医生承受多方面的压力,尤其是在使用新的 3D 技术时。与传统显微镜系统相比,使用这种现代手术系统的认知工作量的量化仍未得到探索。我们评估了使用 3D 与传统显微镜操作系统进行黄斑裂孔 (MH) 手术的外科医生的认知工作量和手术结果。
50 只患有 MH 的眼接受了 3D 或传统显微镜可视化系统的手术。通过三位玻璃体视网膜外科医生的实时工具(外科医生的心率[HR]和血氧饱和度[SPO2])和自我报告工具(手术任务负荷指数[SURG-TLX]问卷)评估认知工作量。根据 SURG-TLX 问卷进行了工作量评估。
在这 50 只眼中,有 30 只眼和 20 只眼分别接受了传统显微镜和 3D 系统的手术。两组 MH 基底直径(p=0.128)、总手术持续时间(p=0.299)、内界膜(ILM)剥离时间(p=0.682)和最终视力(VA;p=0.515)无差异。两组在手术后一个月均显示 VA 显著改善(p<0.001),闭合率达到 90%。认知工作量比较,术中 HR(p=0.024)、总工作量评分(P=0.005)和时间需求维度(p=0.004)在传统显微镜组明显高于 3D 组。在两组中,在进行 ILM 剥离和手术结束时,HR 均从基线显着增加。
使用 3D 观察系统进行黄斑裂孔手术时,外科医生的认知工作量明显减少。此外,手术时间(包括 ILM 剥离时间)、MH 闭合率和视觉结果均不受手术显微镜系统的影响。