Suppr超能文献

光学基因组图谱分析与常规诊断方法在血液系统恶性肿瘤结构变异检测中的比较。

Comparison of Optical Genome Mapping With Conventional Diagnostic Methods for Structural Variant Detection in Hematologic Malignancies.

机构信息

Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

MDxK (Molecular Diagnostics Korea), Inc., Gwacheon, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Lab Med. 2024 Jul 1;44(4):324-334. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.0339. Epub 2024 Mar 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Structural variants (SVs) are currently analyzed using a combination of conventional methods; however, this approach has limitations. Optical genome mapping (OGM), an emerging technology for detecting SVs using a single-molecule strategy, has the potential to replace conventional methods. We compared OGM with conventional diagnostic methods for detecting SVs in various hematologic malignancies.

METHODS

Residual bone marrow aspirates from 27 patients with hematologic malignancies in whom SVs were observed using conventional methods (chromosomal banding analysis, FISH, an RNA fusion panel, and reverse transcription PCR) were analyzed using OGM. The concordance between the OGM and conventional method results was evaluated.

RESULTS

OGM showed concordance in 63% (17/27) and partial concordance in 37% (10/27) of samples. OGM detected 76% (52/68) of the total SVs correctly (concordance rate for each type of SVs: aneuploidies, 83% [15/18]; balanced translocation, 80% [12/15] unbalanced translocation, 54% [7/13] deletions, 81% [13/16]; duplications, 100% [2/2] inversion 100% [1/1]; insertion, 100% [1/1]; marker chromosome, 0% [0/1]; isochromosome, 100% [1/1]). Sixteen discordant results were attributed to the involvement of centromeric/telomeric regions, detection sensitivity, and a low mapping rate and coverage. OGM identified additional SVs, including submicroscopic SVs and novel fusions, in five cases.

CONCLUSIONS

OGM shows a high level of concordance with conventional diagnostic methods for the detection of SVs and can identify novel variants, suggesting its potential utility in enabling more comprehensive SV analysis in routine diagnostics of hematologic malignancies, although further studies and improvements are required.

摘要

背景

目前,结构变异(SVs)是通过常规方法的组合进行分析的;然而,这种方法存在局限性。光学基因组图谱(OGM)是一种新兴的技术,它使用单分子策略来检测 SVs,具有取代常规方法的潜力。我们比较了 OGM 与常规诊断方法在各种血液恶性肿瘤中检测 SVs 的效果。

方法

对 27 例经常规方法(染色体带分析、FISH、RNA 融合panel 和逆转录 PCR)观察到 SVs 的血液恶性肿瘤患者的残留骨髓抽吸物进行 OGM 分析。评估 OGM 与常规方法结果的一致性。

结果

OGM 在 63%(17/27)的样本中具有一致性,在 37%(10/27)的样本中具有部分一致性。OGM 正确检测到 76%(52/68)的总 SVs(每种 SVs 的一致性率:非整倍体,83%[15/18];平衡易位,80%[12/15];不平衡易位,54%[7/13];缺失,81%[13/16];重复,100%[2/2];倒位,100%[1/1];插入,100%[1/1];标记染色体,0%[0/1];等臂染色体,100%[1/1])。16 个不一致的结果归因于着丝粒/端粒区域的参与、检测灵敏度以及低的图谱率和覆盖度。OGM 在 5 例中发现了额外的 SVs,包括亚微观 SVs 和新的融合。

结论

OGM 与用于检测 SVs 的常规诊断方法具有高度一致性,并能识别新的变异,表明其在血液恶性肿瘤常规诊断中进行更全面的 SV 分析方面具有潜在的应用价值,尽管还需要进一步的研究和改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159b/10961627/968d0882aae2/alm-44-4-324-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验