• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓损伤健康维护工具的共同设计以支持自我管理:混合方法研究

Co-design of the Spinal Cord Injury Health Maintenance Tool to Support Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Approach.

机构信息

John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW Australia.

The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.

出版信息

Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2024 Winter;30(1):59-73. doi: 10.46292/sci23-00042. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

DOI:10.46292/sci23-00042
PMID:38433736
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10906369/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consumer-friendly tools to empower and support people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) to self-manage complex health needs in community. This article describes the co-design process of the new SCI Health Maintenance Tool (SCI-HMT).

METHODS

Co-design of the SCI-HMT using a mixed-methods approach included a rapid review, e-Delphi surveys with range of multidisciplinary health care professionals ( = 62), interviews of participants with SCI ( = 18) and general practitioners ( = 4), focus groups ( = 3 with 7, 4, and 4 participants with SCI, respectively), design workshops with stakeholders ( = 11, 8), and end-user testing ( = 41).

RESULTS

The SCI-HMT (healthmaintenancetool.com) was developed based on participatory research with data synthesis from multiple sources. Five priority health maintenance issues for bladder, bowel, skin, pain, and autonomic dysreflexia were originally covered. Best practice recommendations, red flag conditions, referrals, and clinical pathways were agreed on through an e-Delphi technique. Qualitative analysis identified six broad key concepts for self-management, including early symptom recognition, role of SCI peers, knowledge sharing with primary care, general practitioners as gatekeepers, and shared decision-making and highlighted a need to place much stronger emphasis on mental health and well-being. Design workshops and end-user testing provided key insights about user experience, functionality, and content for the SCI-HMT.

CONCLUSION

The co-design process engaging end users, including people with SCI and general practitioners, enabled a shared understanding of the problem and identification of important needs and how to meet them. Informed by this process, the SCI-HMT is a freely accessible resource supporting SCI self-management, shared decision-making, and early problem identification.

摘要

背景

目前缺乏方便消费者使用的工具,无法为社区中患有脊髓损伤 (SCI) 的患者提供支持,帮助他们管理复杂的健康需求。本文描述了新型 SCI 健康维护工具 (SCI-HMT) 的共同设计过程。

方法

采用混合方法对 SCI-HMT 进行共同设计,包括快速审查、范围广泛的多学科医疗保健专业人员的电子德尔菲调查 (n = 62)、18 名 SCI 参与者和 4 名全科医生的访谈、3 个焦点小组(分别有 7、4 和 4 名 SCI 参与者)、利益相关者设计研讨会 (n = 11、8) 和最终用户测试 (n = 41)。

结果

基于参与式研究和多源数据综合,开发了 SCI-HMT(healthmaintenancetool.com)。最初涵盖了膀胱、肠道、皮肤、疼痛和自主反射不良这五个优先健康维护问题。通过电子德尔菲技术达成了最佳实践建议、警示条件、转诊和临床路径。定性分析确定了自我管理的六个广泛关键概念,包括早期症状识别、SCI 同行的作用、与初级保健共享知识、全科医生作为守门人以及共同决策,并强调需要更加重视心理健康和幸福感。设计研讨会和最终用户测试提供了有关 SCI-HMT 用户体验、功能和内容的关键见解。

结论

让包括 SCI 患者和全科医生在内的最终用户参与共同设计过程,使大家能够共同理解问题,并确定重要需求及其满足方式。在这一过程的指导下,SCI-HMT 是一个免费的资源,支持 SCI 自我管理、共同决策和早期问题识别。

相似文献

1
Co-design of the Spinal Cord Injury Health Maintenance Tool to Support Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Approach.脊髓损伤健康维护工具的共同设计以支持自我管理:混合方法研究
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2024 Winter;30(1):59-73. doi: 10.46292/sci23-00042. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
2
Using the consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to integrate innovation recipients' perspectives into the implementation of a digital version of the spinal cord injury health maintenance tool: a qualitative analysis.利用整合实施研究框架将创新接受者的观点纳入脊髓损伤健康维护工具数字版本的实施中:定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 28;24(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10847-x.
3
Autonomic dysreflexia during urodynamics in children and adolescents with spinal cord injury or severe neurologic disease.脊髓损伤或严重神经疾病的儿童及青少年在尿动力学检查期间的自主神经反射异常
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Feb;11(1):32.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
Complex lived experiences and hidden disability after spinal cord injury: a latent profile analysis of the Australian arm of the International Spinal Cord Injury (Aus-InSCI) Community Survey.脊髓损伤后复杂的生活经历和隐性残疾:澳大利亚国际脊髓损伤(Aus-InSCI)社区调查的潜在剖面分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Oct;46(20):4675-4686. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2283101. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
6
Participatory Design of an Online Self-Management Tool for Users With Spinal Cord Injury: Qualitative Study.脊髓损伤患者在线自我管理工具的参与式设计:定性研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Mar 21;5(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/rehab.8158.
7
Co-design and prototype development of MedManageSCI: a medication self-management toolkit for adults with spinal cord injury/dysfunction.MedManageSCI的协同设计与原型开发:一种用于脊髓损伤/功能障碍成人的药物自我管理工具包。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12705-w.
8
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
9
Developing a Health Care Transition Intervention With Young People With Spinal Cord Injuries: Co-design Approach.为脊髓损伤青年开发医疗保健过渡干预措施:共同设计方法。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 28;6(7):e38616. doi: 10.2196/38616.
10
Web-Based Health Coaching for Spinal Cord Injury: Results From a Mixed Methods Feasibility Evaluation.基于网络的脊髓损伤健康指导:混合方法可行性评估的结果
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Jul 31;7(2):e16351. doi: 10.2196/16351.

引用本文的文献

1
Shining a light on the road towards conducting principle-based co-production research in rehabilitation.照亮康复领域开展基于原则的合作生产研究之路。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Apr 10;5:1386746. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1386746. eCollection 2024.
2
Using the consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to integrate innovation recipients' perspectives into the implementation of a digital version of the spinal cord injury health maintenance tool: a qualitative analysis.利用整合实施研究框架将创新接受者的观点纳入脊髓损伤健康维护工具数字版本的实施中:定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 28;24(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10847-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Australian arm of the International Spinal Cord Injury (Aus-InSCI) Community Survey: 3. Drivers of quality of life in people with spinal cord injury.澳大利亚脊髓损伤国际社区调查(Aus-InSCI):3. 脊髓损伤患者生活质量的驱动因素。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Mar;61(3):185-193. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00845-3. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
2
Cognitive Impairment in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: Findings of a Systematic Review With Robust Variance and Network Meta-analyses.脊髓损伤患者的认知障碍:系统评价的稳健方差和网络荟萃分析结果。
Neurology. 2022 Oct 17;99(16):e1779-e1790. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200957.
3
A Narrative Review of Research on Adjustment to Spinal Cord Injury and Mental Health: Gaps, Future Directions, and Practice Recommendations.脊髓损伤适应与心理健康研究的叙述性综述:差距、未来方向及实践建议
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Aug 5;15:1997-2010. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S259712. eCollection 2022.
4
Investigating Dynamics of the Spinal Cord Injury Adjustment Model: Mediation Model Analysis.脊髓损伤适应模型的动力学研究:中介模型分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 4;11(15):4557. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154557.
5
Psychosocial Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review.脊髓损伤的心理社会后果:一项叙述性综述。
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 20;12(7):1178. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071178.
6
The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review.利用共同生产、共同设计和共同创作来调动健康状况管理中的知识:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):877. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y.
7
Australian arm of the International Spinal Cord Injury (Aus-InSCI) Community Survey: 2. Understanding the lived experience in people with spinal cord injury.澳大利亚国际脊髓损伤(Aus-InSCI)社区调查:2. 了解脊髓损伤患者的生活体验。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Dec;60(12):1069-1079. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00817-7. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
8
Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Where Have We Been? Where Are We Now? Where Are We Going?急性脊髓损伤的管理:我们曾经身处何方?我们如今又在何处?我们将去往何方?
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Dec;39(23-24):1591-1602. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0009. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
9
Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum.概念化与实施研究整合框架(CFIR)一起使用的结果:CFIR 结果附录。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 22;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5.
10
Development of a Self-Management App for People with Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤患者自我管理应用程序的开发。
J Med Syst. 2019 Apr 22;43(6):145. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1273-x.