• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓损伤患者在线自我管理工具的参与式设计:定性研究

Participatory Design of an Online Self-Management Tool for Users With Spinal Cord Injury: Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Allin Sonya, Shepherd John, Tomasone Jennifer, Munce Sarah, Linassi Gary, Hossain Saima Noreen, Jaglal Susan

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Mar 21;5(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/rehab.8158.

DOI:10.2196/rehab.8158
PMID:29563075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5885063/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rehospitalization rates resulting from secondary conditions in persons with spinal cord injuries (SCI) are high. Self-management programs for many chronic conditions have been associated with decreases in hospital readmissions. However, in the SCI community, evidence suggests that satisfaction with traditional self-management programs is low. Users with SCI have indicated preference for programs that are online (rather than in-person), that target SCI-specific concerns, and are led by peers with SCI. There is currently no program with all of these features, which addresses self-management of secondary conditions after SCI.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide details of a participatory design (PD) process for an internet-mediated self-management program for users with SCI (called SCI & U) and illustrate how it has been used to define design constraints and solutions.

METHODS

Users were involved in development as codesigners, codevelopers, and key informants. Codesigners and codevelopers were recruited from consumer advocacy groups and worked with a core development team. Key informants were recruited from geographically distributed advocacy groups to form a product advisory council that met regularly with the core team. During meetings, codesigners and informants walked through stages of work that typify PD processes such as exploration, discovery, and prototyping. This paper details the process by analyzing 10 meetings that took place between August 2015 and May 2016. Meetings were recorded, transcribed, and subjected to an inductive thematic analysis; resulting themes were organized according to their relationship to PD stages.

RESULTS

A total of 16 individuals participated in meeting discussions, including 7 researchers and 9 persons with SCI from 4 Canadian provinces. Themes of trust, expertise, and community emerged in every group discussion. The exploration stage revealed interest in online self-management resources coupled with concerns about information credibility. In general, participants indicated that they felt more confident with information received from trusted, in-person sources (eg, peers or health care professionals) than information found online. The discovery stage saw participants propose and discuss concepts to filter credible information and highlight community expertise, namely (1) a community-curated resource database, (2) online information navigators, and (3) group chats with peers. Several tools and techniques were collectively prototyped in an effort to foster trust and community; these are illustrated in the Results section.

CONCLUSIONS

A PD process engaging users as codesigners, codevelopers, and informants can be used to identify design concerns and prototype online solutions to promote self-management after SCI. Future work will assess the usability of the collectively designed tools among a broad population of Canadians with SCI and the tools' impact on self-efficacy and health.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145d/5885063/73d837cdee41/rehab_v5i1e6_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145d/5885063/126b38be4b11/rehab_v5i1e6_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145d/5885063/5d1c905e0709/rehab_v5i1e6_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145d/5885063/75820baed19e/rehab_v5i1e6_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145d/5885063/0b343031f648/rehab_v5i1e6_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145d/5885063/73d837cdee41/rehab_v5i1e6_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145d/5885063/126b38be4b11/rehab_v5i1e6_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145d/5885063/5d1c905e0709/rehab_v5i1e6_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145d/5885063/75820baed19e/rehab_v5i1e6_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145d/5885063/0b343031f648/rehab_v5i1e6_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145d/5885063/73d837cdee41/rehab_v5i1e6_fig5.jpg
摘要

背景

脊髓损伤(SCI)患者因继发疾病导致的再住院率很高。许多慢性病的自我管理项目与降低医院再入院率有关。然而,在SCI患者群体中,证据表明对传统自我管理项目的满意度较低。SCI患者表示更喜欢在线(而非面对面)的项目,这些项目针对SCI特有的问题,并且由SCI患者同伴主导。目前还没有一个具备所有这些特征的项目来解决SCI后继发疾病的自我管理问题。

目的

本研究的目的是详细介绍一个针对SCI患者的互联网介导自我管理项目(称为SCI&U)的参与式设计(PD)过程,并说明它是如何被用于定义设计约束和解决方案的。

方法

用户作为共同设计者、共同开发者和关键信息提供者参与项目开发。共同设计者和共同开发者从消费者权益倡导团体中招募,并与一个核心开发团队合作。关键信息提供者从地理上分布的倡导团体中招募,以组成一个产品咨询委员会,该委员会定期与核心团队会面。在会议期间,共同设计者和信息提供者经历了典型的PD过程阶段,如探索、发现和原型制作。本文通过分析2015年8月至2016年5月期间举行的10次会议来详细介绍该过程。会议进行了录音、转录,并进行了归纳主题分析;所得主题根据它们与PD阶段的关系进行组织。

结果

共有16人参与了会议讨论,包括7名研究人员和来自加拿大4个省份的9名SCI患者。信任、专业知识和社区等主题出现在每次小组讨论中。探索阶段显示出对在线自我管理资源的兴趣,同时也对信息可信度表示担忧。总体而言,参与者表示,与从网上找到的信息相比,他们对从可信赖的面对面来源(如同伴或医疗保健专业人员)获得的信息更有信心。在发现阶段,参与者提出并讨论了过滤可信信息和突出社区专业知识的概念,即(1)一个由社区策划的资源数据库,(2)在线信息导航器,以及(3)与同伴的群聊。为了促进信任和社区,共同制作了几种工具和技术原型;结果部分对此进行了说明。

结论

让用户作为共同设计者、共同开发者和信息提供者参与的PD过程可用于识别设计问题,并为促进SCI后的自我管理制作在线解决方案原型。未来的工作将评估共同设计的工具在广大加拿大SCI患者群体中的可用性,以及这些工具对自我效能和健康的影响。

相似文献

1
Participatory Design of an Online Self-Management Tool for Users With Spinal Cord Injury: Qualitative Study.脊髓损伤患者在线自我管理工具的参与式设计:定性研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Mar 21;5(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/rehab.8158.
2
Web-Based Health Coaching for Spinal Cord Injury: Results From a Mixed Methods Feasibility Evaluation.基于网络的脊髓损伤健康指导:混合方法可行性评估的结果
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Jul 31;7(2):e16351. doi: 10.2196/16351.
3
A Web-Based Physical Activity Portal for Individuals Living With a Spinal Cord Injury: Qualitative Study.一个针对脊髓损伤患者的基于网络的身体活动门户网站:定性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Jul 26;3(3):e12507. doi: 10.2196/12507.
4
Feasibility of a Community-Based, Online, Peer-Supported Spinal Cord Injury Self-management Intervention: Protocol for a Pilot Wait-Listed Randomized Trial.基于社区的在线同伴支持脊髓损伤自我管理干预的可行性:一项试点等待名单随机试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Feb 7;12:e42688. doi: 10.2196/42688.
5
Co-design of the Spinal Cord Injury Health Maintenance Tool to Support Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Approach.脊髓损伤健康维护工具的共同设计以支持自我管理:混合方法研究
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2024 Winter;30(1):59-73. doi: 10.46292/sci23-00042. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
6
Meaning of self-management from the perspective of individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury, their caregivers, and acute care and rehabilitation managers: an opportunity for improved care delivery.从创伤性脊髓损伤患者、他们的护理人员以及急性护理和康复管理人员的角度看自我管理的意义:改善护理服务的契机。
BMC Neurol. 2016 Jan 23;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0534-2.
7
"The Other Thousand Hours": A Spinal Cord Injury Self-Management Program Qualitative Analysis.《另外的一千小时》:脊髓损伤自我管理项目的定性分析
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2025 Apr;45(2):241-251. doi: 10.1177/15394492241260648. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
8
Designing interactivity on consumer health websites: PARAFORUM for spinal cord injury.设计消费者健康网站的交互性:脊髓损伤患者的PARAFORUM
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):459-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
9
Health care provider practices, barriers, and facilitators for weight management for individuals with spinal cord injuries and disorders.脊髓损伤和疾病患者体重管理的医疗服务提供者实践、障碍及促进因素
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014 Fall;20(4):329-37. doi: 10.1310/sci2004-329.
10
Views of people with traumatic spinal cord injury about the components of self-management programs and program delivery: a Canadian pilot study.创伤性脊髓损伤患者对自我管理项目组成部分及项目实施的看法:一项加拿大试点研究。
BMC Neurol. 2014 Oct 21;14:209. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0209-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Challenges to Co-Design Digital Health Interventions With End Users: Systematic Review.审视与终端用户共同设计数字健康干预措施所面临的挑战:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 14;27:e50178. doi: 10.2196/50178.
2
Citizen involvement in research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being: a scoping review.公民参与健康、护理或福祉技术创新研究:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Sep 2;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01152-4.
3
The Spinal Cord Injury Self-Management Program: A Pilot.脊髓损伤自我管理项目:一项试点研究。

本文引用的文献

1
Using the theoretical domains framework to guide the development of a self-management program for individuals with spinal cord injury: Results from a national stakeholder advisory group.运用理论领域框架指导脊髓损伤患者自我管理项目的开发:来自全国利益相关者咨询小组的结果
J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Nov;40(6):687-695. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1356437. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
2
Randomized Trial of a Peer-Led, Telephone-Based Empowerment Intervention for Persons With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Improves Health Self-Management.一项针对慢性脊髓损伤患者的由同伴主导的基于电话的赋权干预随机试验改善了健康自我管理。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jun;98(6):1067-1076.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2025 Jul;45(3):408-417. doi: 10.1177/15394492241271173. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
4
"The Other Thousand Hours": A Spinal Cord Injury Self-Management Program Qualitative Analysis.《另外的一千小时》:脊髓损伤自我管理项目的定性分析
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2025 Apr;45(2):241-251. doi: 10.1177/15394492241260648. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
5
Co-design of the Spinal Cord Injury Health Maintenance Tool to Support Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Approach.脊髓损伤健康维护工具的共同设计以支持自我管理:混合方法研究
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2024 Winter;30(1):59-73. doi: 10.46292/sci23-00042. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
6
Identifying priorities for balance interventions through a participatory co-design approach with end-users.通过与终端用户共同参与式设计方法确定平衡干预措施的优先事项。
BMC Neurol. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03312-5.
7
Needs Assessment of Self-Management for Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury/Disease.慢性脊髓损伤/疾病患者自我管理需求评估。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2024 Jan;44(1):57-66. doi: 10.1177/15394492231183627. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
8
Mobile Health Self-management Support for Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Literature Review.移动医疗对脊髓损伤的自我管理支持:系统文献回顾。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Apr 26;11:e42679. doi: 10.2196/42679.
9
Co-design of the Transgender Health Information Resource: Web-Based Participatory Design.跨性别健康信息资源的共同设计:基于网络的参与式设计
J Particip Med. 2023 Jan 10;15:e38078. doi: 10.2196/38078.
10
Self-Management Embedded in Daily Activities: A Photoelicitation Focus Group Study among Persons with Spinal Cord Injury and Their Primary Caregivers in Bangladesh.自我管理融入日常生活:孟加拉国脊髓损伤患者及其主要照护者的照片诱导焦点小组研究。
Occup Ther Int. 2022 Mar 15;2022:2705104. doi: 10.1155/2022/2705104. eCollection 2022.
The relationship between the implementation and effectiveness of a nationwide physical activity telephone counseling service for adults with spinal cord injury.
一项针对脊髓损伤成人的全国性体育活动电话咨询服务的实施与效果之间的关系。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Mar;40(5):527-537. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1261415. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
4
Self-management interventions: Proposal and validation of a new operational definition.自我管理干预措施:一种新操作定义的提议与验证
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;80:34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
5
Empowering Adults With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury to Prevent Secondary Conditions.增强慢性脊髓损伤成年人预防继发性疾病的能力。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1687-1695.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
6
Is Participatory Design Associated with the Effectiveness of Serious Digital Games for Healthy Lifestyle Promotion? A Meta-Analysis.参与式设计与促进健康生活方式的严肃数字游戏的有效性相关吗?一项荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 29;18(4):e94. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4444.
7
Health Advice from Internet Discussion Forums: How Bad Is Dangerous?来自网络讨论论坛的健康建议:危险程度如何?
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 6;18(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5051.
8
Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research.重新审视定量与定性之争:对混合方法研究的启示
Qual Quant. 2002 Feb;36(1):43-53. doi: 10.1023/A:1014301607592.
9
Health Information Seeking and Technology Use Among Veterans With Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders.脊髓损伤和疾病退伍军人的健康信息寻求与技术使用情况
PM R. 2016 Feb;8(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.443. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
10
Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps.移动应用程序评分量表:一种评估健康移动应用程序质量的新工具。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3422.