• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情给全球危机应对治理带来的启示:一项研究议程。

Lessons from COVID-19 for GCR governance: a research agenda.

作者信息

Rietveld Jochem, Hobson Tom, Avin Shahar, Sundaram Lalitha, Mani Lara

机构信息

Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2024 Jan 3;11:514. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.111331.2. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.111331.2
PMID:38434002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10904943/
Abstract

The Lessons from Covid-19 Research Agenda offers a structure to study the COVID-19 pandemic and the pandemic response from a Global Catastrophic Risk (GCR) perspective. The agenda sets out the aims of our study, which is to investigate the key decisions and actions (or failures to decide or to act) that significantly altered the course of the pandemic, with the aim of improving disaster preparedness and response in the future. It also asks how we can transfer these lessons to other areas of (potential) global catastrophic risk management such as extreme climate change, radical loss of biodiversity and the governance of extreme risks posed by new technologies. Our study aims to identify key moments- 'inflection points'- that significantly shaped the catastrophic trajectory of COVID-19. To that end this Research Agenda has identified four broad clusters where such inflection points are likely to exist: pandemic preparedness, early action, vaccines and non-pharmaceutical interventions. The aim is to drill down into each of these clusters to ascertain whether and how the course of the pandemic might have gone differently, both at the national and the global level, using counterfactual analysis. Four aspects are used to assess candidate inflection points within each cluster: 1. the information available at the time; 2. the decision-making processes used; 3. the capacity and ability to implement different courses of action, and 4. the communication of information and decisions to different publics. The Research Agenda identifies crucial questions in each cluster for all four aspects that should enable the identification of the key lessons from COVID-19 and the pandemic response.

摘要

《新冠疫情研究议程的经验教训》提供了一个框架,用于从全球灾难性风险(GCR)的角度研究新冠疫情及疫情应对措施。该议程阐述了我们的研究目标,即调查那些显著改变疫情走向的关键决策和行动(或决策与行动的缺失),以期改善未来的灾难防范与应对工作。它还探讨了如何将这些经验教训应用于其他(潜在的)全球灾难性风险管理领域,如极端气候变化、生物多样性的急剧丧失以及新技术带来的极端风险治理。我们的研究旨在确定那些显著塑造了新冠疫情灾难性轨迹的关键时刻——“转折点”。为此,本研究议程确定了四个广泛的类别,这些转折点可能存在于其中:疫情防范、早期行动、疫苗和非药物干预措施。目标是深入研究每个类别,通过反事实分析来确定在国家和全球层面上,疫情的发展过程是否以及如何可能有所不同。每个类别中的候选转折点通过四个方面进行评估:1. 当时可获取的信息;2. 所采用的决策过程;3. 实施不同行动方案的能力,以及4. 向不同公众传达信息和决策的情况。该研究议程针对这四个方面在每个类别中确定了关键问题,这些问题应有助于从新冠疫情及疫情应对措施中总结出关键经验教训。

相似文献

1
Lessons from COVID-19 for GCR governance: a research agenda.新冠疫情给全球危机应对治理带来的启示:一项研究议程。
F1000Res. 2024 Jan 3;11:514. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.111331.2. eCollection 2022.
2
Covid-19, and the climate change and biodiversity emergencies.Covid-19 疫情,以及气候变化和生物多样性紧急情况。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 20;844:157188. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157188. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
3
Assessing pandemic preparedness, response, and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic in four south American countries: agenda for the future.评估大流行准备、应对情况以及从四个南美国家 COVID-19 大流行中吸取的经验教训:未来议程。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 29;11:1274737. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1274737. eCollection 2023.
4
The COVID-19 pandemic posed many dilemmas for policymakers, which sometimes resulted in unprecedented decision-making.新冠疫情大流行给政策制定者带来了许多困境,有时导致了前所未有的决策。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2023 Apr 18;12(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13584-023-00564-x.
5
Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on climate change summit negotiations from the climate governance perspective.从气候治理角度看 COVID-19 大流行对气候变化峰会谈判的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 20;878:162936. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162936. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
6
Global Health System Resilience during Encounters with Stressors - Lessons Learnt from Cancer Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic.全球卫生系统应对压力源的韧性 - 从 COVID-19 大流行期间的癌症服务中吸取的经验教训。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2023 Apr;35(4):e289-e300. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
7
Global key concepts of civil-military cooperation for disaster management in the COVID-19 pandemic-A qualitative phenomenological scoping review.全球 COVID-19 大流行期间军民合作管理灾害的关键概念:一项定性现象学范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;10:975667. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.975667. eCollection 2022.
8
Designing and implementing equity-based pandemic preparedness and response learning modules: lessons from a multi-country short-course.设计和实施基于公平的大流行病防范和应对学习模块:多国家短期课程的经验教训。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2104319. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2104319.
9
The macropsychology of COVID-19: Psychological governance as pandemic response.新冠疫情的宏观心理学:作为大流行病应对措施的心理治理。
Am Psychol. 2022 Jan;77(1):100-110. doi: 10.1037/amp0000909. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
10
Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic for future epidemics and pandemics preparedness and response in Guinea: Findings from a scoping review.从 COVID-19 大流行中汲取教训,为几内亚未来的疫情和大流行防范与应对做准备:来自范围综述的研究结果。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;10:879850. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.879850. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic.《柳叶刀》新冠疫情对未来的启示委员会
Lancet. 2022 Oct 8;400(10359):1224-1280. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01585-9. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
2
Saving millions of lives but some resources squandered: emerging lessons from health research system pandemic achievements and challenges.挽救了数百万人的生命,但一些资源却被浪费了:从卫生研究系统应对大流行病的成就和挑战中获得的新经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Sep 10;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00883-6.
3
The collaborative research and service delivery partnership between the United States healthcare system and the U.S. Military Health System during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,美国医疗保健系统与美国军事医疗系统之间的合作研究和服务提供伙伴关系。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jul 19;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00885-4.
4
The pandemic's true death toll: millions more than official counts.疫情的真实死亡人数:比官方统计多出数百万。
Nature. 2022 Jan;601(7893):312-315. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00104-8.
5
What drives compliance with COVID-19 measures over time? Explaining changing impacts with Goal Framing Theory.随着时间的推移,是什么推动了对新冠疫情防控措施的遵守?运用目标框架理论解释不断变化的影响。
Regul Gov. 2021 Oct 7. doi: 10.1111/rego.12440.
6
NSW Health COVID-19 Emergency Response Priority Research program: a case study of rapid translation of research into health decision making.新南威尔士州卫生厅 COVID-19 应急响应优先研究计划:快速将研究转化为卫生决策的案例研究。
Public Health Res Pract. 2021 Nov 10;31(4):3142124. doi: 10.17061/phrp3142124.
7
Following the science? Views from scientists on government advisory boards during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study in five European countries.跟随科学?新冠疫情期间政府顾问委员会中科学家的观点:来自五个欧洲国家的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006928.
8
The tangled history of mRNA vaccines.信使核糖核酸疫苗的复杂历史。
Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7876):318-324. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02483-w.
9
Making trials part of good clinical care: lessons from the RECOVERY trial.将试验纳入优质临床护理:RECOVERY试验的经验教训。
Future Healthc J. 2021 Jul;8(2):e243-e250. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0083.
10
How COVID-19 and the Dutch 'intelligent lockdown' change activities, work and travel behaviour: Evidence from longitudinal data in the Netherlands.新冠疫情与荷兰“智能封锁”如何改变活动、工作和出行行为:来自荷兰纵向数据的证据
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100150. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150. Epub 2020 Jun 10.