Morozas Arnoldas, Malyško-Ptašinskė Veronika, Kulbacka Julita, Ivaška Justinas, Ivaškienė Tatjana, Novickij Vitalij
Department of Immunology and Bioelectrochemistry, State Research Institute Centre of Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Faculty of Electronics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 15;14:1353800. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1353800. eCollection 2024.
Head and neck cancer continues to be among the most prevalent types of cancer globally, yet it can be managed with appropriate treatment approaches. Presently, chemotherapy and radiotherapy stand as the primary treatment modalities for various groups and regions affected by head and neck cancer. Nonetheless, these treatments are linked to adverse side effects in patients. Moreover, due to tumor resistance to multiple drugs (both intrinsic and extrinsic) and radiotherapy, along with numerous other factors, recurrences or metastases often occur. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) emerges as a clinically proven alternative that offers high efficacy, localized effect, and diminished negative factors. Electrochemotherapy involves the treatment of solid tumors by combining a non-permeable cytotoxic drug, such as bleomycin, with a locally administered pulsed electric field (PEF). It is crucial to employ this method effectively by utilizing optimal PEF protocols and drugs at concentrations that do not possess inherent cytotoxic properties. This review emphasizes an examination of diverse clinical practices of ECT concerning head and neck cancer. It specifically delves into the treatment procedure, the choice of anti-cancer drugs, pre-treatment planning, PEF protocols, and electroporation electrodes as well as the efficacy of tumor response to the treatment and encountered obstacles. We have also highlighted the significance of assessing the spatial electric field distribution in both tumor and adjacent tissues prior to treatment as it plays a pivotal role in determining treatment success. Finally, we compare the ECT methodology to conventional treatments to highlight the potential for improvement and to facilitate popularization of the technique in the area of head and neck cancers where it is not widespread yet while it is not the case with other cancer types.
头颈癌仍然是全球最常见的癌症类型之一,但可以通过适当的治疗方法进行管理。目前,化疗和放疗是受头颈癌影响的不同群体和地区的主要治疗方式。然而,这些治疗与患者的不良副作用有关。此外,由于肿瘤对多种药物(包括内在和外在)以及放疗产生耐药性,再加上许多其他因素,复发或转移经常发生。电化学疗法(ECT)作为一种临床验证的替代方法出现,具有高效、局部作用和减少负面因素的特点。电化学疗法是通过将一种不可渗透的细胞毒性药物(如博来霉素)与局部施加的脉冲电场(PEF)相结合来治疗实体瘤。通过使用最佳的PEF方案和不具有固有细胞毒性特性的浓度的药物来有效应用这种方法至关重要。本综述强调对头颈癌ECT的各种临床实践进行研究。它特别深入探讨了治疗程序、抗癌药物的选择、治疗前规划、PEF方案、电穿孔电极以及肿瘤对治疗的反应疗效和遇到的障碍。我们还强调了在治疗前评估肿瘤和相邻组织中空间电场分布的重要性,因为它在确定治疗成功方面起着关键作用。最后,我们将ECT方法与传统治疗方法进行比较,以突出改进的潜力,并促进该技术在头颈癌领域的推广,在该领域该技术尚未广泛应用,而在其他癌症类型中并非如此。