Suppr超能文献

道德伤害与生物伦理学的四大支柱。

Moral injury and the four pillars of bioethics.

作者信息

Heston Thomas F, Pahang Joshuel A

机构信息

Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, 99210-1495, USA.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2023 Dec 28;8:1193. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19754.4. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Healthcare providers experience moral injury when their internal ethics are violated. The routine and direct exposure to ethical violations makes clinicians vulnerable to harm. The fundamental ethics in health care typically fall into the four broad categories of patient autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and social justice. Patients have a moral right to determine their own goals of medical care, that is, they have autonomy. When this principle is violated, moral injury occurs. Beneficence is the desire to help people, so when the delivery of proper medical care is obstructed for any reason, moral injury is the result. Nonmaleficence, meaning do no harm, has been a primary principle of medical ethics throughout recorded history. Yet today, even the most advanced and safest medical treatments are associated with unavoidable, harmful side effects. When an inevitable side effect occurs, the patient is harmed, and the clinician is also at risk of moral injury. Social injustice results when patients experience suboptimal treatment due to their race, gender, religion, or other demographic variables. While minor ethical dilemmas and violations routinely occur in medical care and cannot be eliminated, clinicians can decrease the prevalence of a significant moral injury by advocating for the ethical treatment of patients, not only at the bedside but also by addressing the ethics of political influence, governmental mandates, and administrative burdens on the delivery of optimal medical care. Although clinicians can strengthen their resistance to moral injury by deepening their own spiritual foundation, that is not enough. Improvements in the ethics of the entire healthcare system are necessary to improve medical care and decrease moral injury.

摘要

当医疗服务提供者的内在道德准则被违反时,他们会遭受道德伤害。日常且直接地接触道德违规行为会使临床医生容易受到伤害。医疗保健中的基本道德准则通常可分为患者自主、善意、不伤害和社会公正这四大类。患者有道德权利来决定自己的医疗目标,也就是说,他们拥有自主权。当这一原则被违反时,就会发生道德伤害。善意是帮助他人的愿望,所以当因任何原因阻碍提供适当的医疗护理时,就会导致道德伤害。不伤害,即勿造成伤害,在有记录的历史中一直是医学伦理的首要原则。然而如今,即使是最先进、最安全的医疗治疗也会伴随着不可避免的有害副作用。当不可避免的副作用发生时,患者会受到伤害,临床医生也有遭受道德伤害的风险。当患者由于种族、性别、宗教或其他人口统计学变量而接受次优治疗时,就会产生社会不公正。虽然在医疗护理中经常会出现轻微的伦理困境和违规行为且无法消除,但临床医生可以通过倡导对患者进行符合伦理的治疗来降低严重道德伤害的发生率,不仅在床边,还要解决政治影响、政府指令以及提供最佳医疗护理时行政负担方面的伦理问题。虽然临床医生可以通过深化自身的精神基础来增强对道德伤害的抵抗力,但这还不够。整个医疗保健系统的伦理改进对于改善医疗护理和减少道德伤害是必要的。

相似文献

1
Moral injury and the four pillars of bioethics.道德伤害与生物伦理学的四大支柱。
F1000Res. 2023 Dec 28;8:1193. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19754.4. eCollection 2019.
3
Hard times, hard choices: founding bioethics today.艰难时刻,艰难抉择:当今生物伦理学的创立
Bioethics. 1995 Jul;9(3-4):192-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00355.x.
6
The foundations and the development of modern medical ethics.现代医学伦理学的基础与发展
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995 Sep;12(8):473-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02212908.

本文引用的文献

3
Moral distress in health care: when is it fitting?医疗保健中的道德困境:何时合适?
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Jun;23(2):165-177. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09942-7.
4
Development and Validation of the Moral Injury Scales for Youth.发展和验证青少年道德伤害量表。
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Jun;32(3):448-458. doi: 10.1002/jts.22408. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
8
Informed Consent Training in Pediatrics-Are We Doing Enough?儿科中的知情同意培训——我们做得够吗?
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Mar 1;172(3):211-212. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4088.
10
The Moral Injury Symptom Scale-Military Version.道德损伤症状量表 - 军事版
J Relig Health. 2018 Feb;57(1):249-265. doi: 10.1007/s10943-017-0531-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验