Kita Keiichiro, Kuroda Kaku, Saito Mayuko, Kuroda Moe, Ogawa Daishi, Kuroiwa Maiko
General Internal Medicine, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, JPN.
Family Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Jan 30;16(1):e53260. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53260. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Advance care planning (ACP) has been widely recognized and practiced worldwide since the 1990s. However, only a few studies have compared clinicians' international perceptions of and experiences with ACP. Therefore, this study explored the perceptions and practices of family physicians (FPs) regarding ACP in Japan and the United States.
We conducted a convergent parallel mixed-methods study using a cross-sectional web-based anonymous questionnaire survey to examine how the perceptions and practices of ACP differ between Japanese and American FPs working in regional cities.
Responses from 20 and 19 FPs in Japan and the United States were obtained, respectively. Both FP groups received ACP training during their residency and practiced ACP with the highest regard for the patient's wishes and values. Quantitative analysis revealed that American FPs placed more emphasis on documentation and patient language skills. Qualitative analysis revealed that Japanese FPs equally emphasized communication with patients' families and with patients. We merged the results of both analyses and hypothesized that the variations in the FPs' approaches to ACP might reflect variations in their backgrounds, such as health insurance systems, cultures, and values in the two countries, rather than differences between individual physicians.
Our study showed that both Japanese and American FPs respect patients' wishes in ACP, with some differences in their perceptions and practices. Therefore, FPs should understand and be flexible with their patients' values and cultural backgrounds as intercultural translators while following appropriate management procedures for successful ACP.
自20世纪90年代以来,预先护理计划(ACP)已在全球范围内得到广泛认可和实践。然而,只有少数研究比较了临床医生对ACP的国际认知和经验。因此,本研究探讨了日本和美国家庭医生(FPs)对ACP的认知和实践。
我们采用基于网络的横断面匿名问卷调查进行了一项收敛平行混合方法研究,以考察在地区城市工作的日本和美国FPs对ACP的认知和实践有何不同。
分别获得了来自日本和美国的20名和19名FPs的回复。两组FPs在住院医师培训期间都接受了ACP培训,并在实践中最重视患者的意愿和价值观。定量分析显示,美国FPs更强调记录和患者语言技能。定性分析显示,日本FPs同样强调与患者家属和患者的沟通。我们合并了两项分析的结果,并假设FPs处理ACP的方法差异可能反映了两国医疗保险系统、文化和价值观等背景差异,而非个体医生之间的差异。
我们的研究表明,日本和美国的FPs在ACP中都尊重患者的意愿,但其认知和实践存在一些差异。因此,FPs应作为跨文化翻译者,在遵循适当的管理程序以成功实施ACP的同时,理解并灵活对待患者的价值观和文化背景。