• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者参与和与不进行心肺复苏术及生命末期披露讨论相关的因素:一项回顾性图表审查研究。

Patient participation and associated factors in the discussions on do-not-attempt-resuscitation and end-of-life disclosure: a retrospective chart review study.

机构信息

Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.

Palliative Care Center, Keio University Hospital, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jan 6;20(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00698-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-020-00698-8
PMID:33407388
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7789264/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient participation is a key foundation of advance care planning (ACP). However, a patient himself/herself may be left out from sensitive conversations such as end-of-life (EOL) care discussions. The objectives of this study were to investigate patients' participation rate in the discussion of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) / Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) order, and in the discussion that the patient is at his/her EOL stage (EOL disclosure), and to explore their associated factors.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review study. The participants were all the patients who were hospitalized and died in a university-affiliated teaching hospital (tertiary medical facility) in central Tokyo, Japan during the period from April 2018 to March 2019. The following patients were excluded: (1) cardiopulmonary arrest on arrival; (2) stillbirth; (3) under 18 years old at the time of death; and (4) refusal by their bereaved family. Presence or absence of CPR/DNAR discussion and EOL disclosure, patients' involvement in those discussions, and their associated factors were investigated.

RESULTS

CPR/DNAR discussions were observed in 336 out of the 358 patients (93.9%). However, 224 of these discussions were carried out without a patient (patient participation rate 33.3%). Male gender (odds ratio (OR) = 2.37 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-4.25]), living alone (OR = 2.51 [1.34-4.71]), and 1 year or more from the date of diagnosis (OR = 1.78 [1.03-3.10]) were associated with higher patient's participation in CPR/DNAR discussions. The EOL disclosure was observed in 341 out of the 358 patients (95.3%). However, 170 of the discussions were carried out without the patient (patient participation rate 50.1%). Patients who died of cancer (OR = 2.41[1.45-4.03]) and patients without mental illness (OR=2.41 [1.11-5.25]) were more likely to participate in EOL disclosure.

CONCLUSIONS

In this clinical sample, only up to half of the patients participated in CPR/DNAR discussions and EOL disclosure. Female, living with family, a shorter period from the diagnosis, non-cancer, and mental illness presence are risk factors for lack of patients' participation in CPR/DNAR or EOL discussions. Further attempts to facilitate patients' participation, based on their preference, are warranted.

摘要

背景

患者参与是预先医疗指示(ACP)的关键基础。然而,患者本人可能会被排除在敏感的对话之外,例如临终关怀讨论。本研究的目的是调查患者参与心肺复苏术(CPR)/不尝试复苏术(DNAR)医嘱讨论以及患者处于临终阶段(临终披露)讨论的参与率,并探讨其相关因素。

方法

这是一项回顾性病历审查研究。研究对象为 2018 年 4 月至 2019 年 3 月期间在日本东京市中心的一所大学附属医院(三级医疗机构)住院死亡的所有患者。以下患者被排除在外:(1)入院时心肺骤停;(2)死产;(3)死亡时未满 18 岁;(4)其家属拒绝。调查了 CPR/DNAR 讨论的存在或不存在、患者对这些讨论的参与情况以及相关因素。

结果

在 358 名患者中,有 336 名患者进行了 CPR/DNAR 讨论(93.9%)。然而,在这些讨论中,有 224 次没有患者参与(患者参与率为 33.3%)。男性(比值比(OR)=2.37[95%置信区间(CI)1.32-4.25])、独居(OR=2.51[1.34-4.71])和诊断后 1 年或以上(OR=1.78[1.03-3.10])与患者更有可能参与 CPR/DNAR 讨论相关。在 358 名患者中,有 341 名患者进行了临终披露(95.3%)。然而,在这些讨论中有 170 次没有患者参与(患者参与率为 50.1%)。死于癌症的患者(OR=2.41[1.45-4.03])和没有精神疾病的患者(OR=2.41[1.11-5.25])更有可能参与临终披露。

结论

在本临床样本中,只有一半左右的患者参与了 CPR/DNAR 讨论和临终披露。女性、与家人同住、从诊断到死亡的时间较短、非癌症和无精神疾病是患者参与 CPR/DNAR 或临终讨论不足的危险因素。有必要根据患者的意愿进一步努力促进患者的参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5375/7789264/bc5746539c69/12904_2020_698_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5375/7789264/a1b2f478886c/12904_2020_698_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5375/7789264/bc5746539c69/12904_2020_698_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5375/7789264/a1b2f478886c/12904_2020_698_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5375/7789264/bc5746539c69/12904_2020_698_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient participation and associated factors in the discussions on do-not-attempt-resuscitation and end-of-life disclosure: a retrospective chart review study.患者参与和与不进行心肺复苏术及生命末期披露讨论相关的因素:一项回顾性图表审查研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jan 6;20(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00698-8.
2
Usage of do-not-attempt-to-resuscitate orders in a Swedish community hospital - patient involvement, documentation and compliance.瑞典一家社区医院中“不要尝试心肺复苏”医嘱的使用——患者参与、记录与依从性
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 1;21(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00510-5.
3
'Do not attempt resuscitation' and 'cardiopulmonary resuscitation' in an inpatient setting: factors influencing physicians' decisions in Switzerland.“不要在住院环境中进行复苏”和“心肺复苏”:影响瑞士医生决策的因素。
Gerontology. 2011;57(5):414-21. doi: 10.1159/000319422. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
4
Including patients in resuscitation decisions in Switzerland: from doing more to doing better.在瑞士,让患者参与复苏决策:从做得更多到做得更好。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Mar;39(3):158-65. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100699. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
5
Obstacles to patient inclusion in CPR/DNAR decisions and challenging conversations: A qualitative study with internal medicine physicians in Southern Switzerland.患者纳入 CPR/DNAR 决策和挑战性对话的障碍:瑞士南部内科医生的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0282270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282270. eCollection 2023.
6
Adopting Advance Directives Reinforces Patient Participation in End-of-Life Care Discussion.采用预先指示加强患者对临终关怀讨论的参与。
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;48(2):753-8. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.281. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
7
Qualitative analysis of expressions used in the end-of-life discussions and their associated factors.对临终讨论中使用的表达方式及其相关因素的定性分析。
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Apr;22(2):374-380. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523001396.
8
End-of-life decision-making for patients admitted through the emergency department: hospital variability, patient demographics, and changes over time.急诊科收治患者的临终决策:医院变异性、患者人口统计学特征及随时间的变化。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(4):381-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12112.
9
Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.心肺复苏的偏好。
Image J Nurs Sch. 1997;29(3):229-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1997.tb00987.x.
10
Absence of Relatives Impairs the Approach of Nurses to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Non-Cancer Elderly Patients without a Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation Order: A Vignette-Based Questionnaire Study.亲属不在场会影响护士对非癌症老年患者进行心肺复苏的态度,这些患者没有下达拒绝复苏医嘱:基于情景的问卷调查研究。
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020 Jan;250(1):71-78. doi: 10.1620/tjem.250.71.

引用本文的文献

1
A survey study of healthcare workers on do not Attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation practice and policy in Ireland.一项关于爱尔兰医护人员对不进行心肺复苏操作及政策的调查研究。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Oct 17;20:100799. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100799. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Unwanted cardiopulmonary resuscitation against patients' "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation" orders in community settings in Japan: A narrative review.日本社区环境中违背患者“不进行复苏尝试”意愿的心肺复苏术:叙述性综述。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2024 Nov;24(11):1093-1098. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14993. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Do Sex Differences Exist in the Establishment of "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation" Orders and Survival in Patients Successfully Resuscitated From In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest?性别差异是否存在于“不进行复苏尝试”医嘱的制定和成功复苏的院内心搏骤停患者的生存中?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 18;9(4):e014200. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014200. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
Evaluating an Intervention to Improve Communication Between Oncology Clinicians and Patients With Life-Limiting Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of the Serious Illness Care Program.评估一项改善肿瘤临床医生与生命末期癌症患者沟通的干预措施:严重疾病护理计划的一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):801-809. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0292.
3
不尝试进行心肺复苏的决策过程:范围综述
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 30;15(3):400-410. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004573.
4
Family Physicians' Perspectives and Practices on Advance Care Planning in Regional Cities in Japan and the United States: A Convergent Parallel Mixed-Methods Study.日本和美国地区城市家庭医生对预先医疗计划的看法与实践:一项聚合平行混合方法研究
Cureus. 2024 Jan 30;16(1):e53260. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53260. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Mapping the Landscape of Advance Care Planning in Adolescents and Young Adults Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A 5-Year Retrospective Review.绘制接受异基因造血干细胞移植的青少年和年轻成人预先医疗照护计划的全景图:一项 5 年回顾性研究。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Mar;28(3):164.e1-164.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.12.007. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
6
Palliative Care Consultation Services on Terminally Ill Cancer Patients and Non-Cancer Patients: Trend Analysis from a 9-Year-Long Observational Study in Taiwan.癌症终末期患者和非癌症患者的姑息治疗咨询服务:台湾一项长达 9 年的观察性研究的趋势分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 19;18(18):9882. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189882.
Predicting one-year mortality in heart failure using the 'Surprise Question': a prospective pilot study.
使用“Surprise Question”预测心力衰竭患者一年死亡率:一项前瞻性试点研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;21(2):227-234. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1353. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
4
Sex differences in surrogate decision-maker preferences for life-sustaining treatments of Japanese patients with heart failure.心力衰竭日本患者生命维持治疗中代理决策者偏好的性别差异。
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Dec;5(6):1165-1172. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12352. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
Prognostic Understanding at Diagnosis and Associated Factors in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer and Their Caregivers.晚期肺癌患者及其照顾者的诊断时预后理解及其相关因素。
Oncologist. 2018 Oct;23(10):1218-1229. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0329. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
6
Factors associated with advance directives completion among patients with advance care planning communication in Taipei, Taiwan.与台湾台北地区有预先医疗照护计划沟通的病患完成预立医疗照护咨商相关之因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0197552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197552. eCollection 2018.
7
Advance care planning in dementia: recommendations for healthcare professionals.痴呆症的预先医疗护理计划:医疗专业人员的建议。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jun 21;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0332-2.
8
Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care.预先医疗照护计划的定义和建议:欧洲缓和医疗协会支持的国际共识。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e543-e551. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X.
9
The Advance Care Planning Readiness Scale: Development and Validation of a Measure of Willingness to Discuss and Acceptance of End-of-Life Care in Gynecologic Cancer Patients.《预立医疗计划准备量表:妇科癌症患者讨论意愿及对临终关怀接受程度测量工具的开发与验证》
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 May;27(4):838-846. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000953.
10
The "surprise question" for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预测重症患者死亡的“意外问题”:系统评价与荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2017 Apr 3;189(13):E484-E493. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160775.