Mackenzie Wearables Research Hub, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Br J Sports Med. 2024 Mar 8;58(5):261-268. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107221.
This study aims to examine the associations of daily step count with all-cause mortality and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) by sedentary time levels and to determine if the minimal and optimal number of daily steps is modified by high sedentary time.
Using data from the UK Biobank, this was a prospective dose-response analysis of total daily steps across low (<10.5 hours/day) and high (≥10.5 hours/day) sedentary time (as defined by the inflection point of the adjusted absolute risk of sedentary time with the two outcomes). Mortality and incident CVD was ascertained through 31 October 2021.
Among 72 174 participants (age=61.1±7.8 years), 1633 deaths and 6190 CVD events occurred over 6.9 (±0.8) years of follow-up. Compared with the referent 2200 steps/day (5th percentile), the optimal dose (nadir of the curve) for all-cause mortality ranged between 9000 and 10 500 steps/day for high (HR (95% CI)=0.61 (0.51 to 0.73)) and low (0.69 (0.52 to 0.92)) sedentary time. For incident CVD, there was a subtle gradient of association by sedentary time level with the lowest risk observed at approximately 9700 steps/day for high (0.79 (0.72 to 0.86)) and low (0.71 (0.61 to 0.83)) sedentary time. The minimal dose (steps/day associated with 50% of the optimal dose) of daily steps was between 4000 and 4500 steps/day across sedentary time groups for all-cause mortality and incident CVD.
Any amount of daily steps above the referent 2200 steps/day was associated with lower mortality and incident CVD risk, for low and high sedentary time. Accruing 9000-10 500 steps/day was associated with the lowest mortality risk independent of sedentary time. For a roughly equivalent number of steps/day, the risk of incident CVD was lower for low sedentary time compared with high sedentary time.
本研究旨在通过久坐时间水平,考察每日步数与全因死亡率和心血管疾病(CVD)事件的相关性,并确定最低和最佳每日步数是否因久坐时间较高而发生改变。
本研究使用英国生物银行(UK Biobank)的数据,进行了一项前瞻性剂量反应分析,研究对象为低(<10.5 小时/天)和高(≥10.5 小时/天)久坐时间(根据与两个结局相关的久坐时间的调整绝对风险拐点来定义)下的总日步数。通过截至 2021 年 10 月 31 日的随访,确定死亡率和心血管疾病事件的发生情况。
在 72174 名参与者(年龄 61.1±7.8 岁)中,随访 6.9(±0.8)年后,有 1633 人死亡,6190 人发生心血管疾病事件。与参考 2200 步/天(第 5 百分位数)相比,全因死亡率的最佳剂量(曲线的最低点)范围在高(HR(95%CI)=0.61(0.51 至 0.73))和低(0.69(0.52 至 0.92))久坐时间组为 9000 至 10500 步/天。对于心血管疾病事件,根据久坐时间水平存在轻微的关联梯度,高(0.79(0.72 至 0.86))和低(0.71(0.61 至 0.83))久坐时间组中,观察到的最低风险出现在约 9700 步/天。高(HR(95%CI)=0.79(0.72 至 0.86))和低(HR(95%CI)=0.71(0.61 至 0.83))久坐时间组中,观察到的最低风险出现在约 9700 步/天。最佳剂量(与最低剂量相关的日步数的 50%)的日步数在高(HR(95%CI)=0.79(0.72 至 0.86))和低(HR(95%CI)=0.71(0.61 至 0.83))久坐时间组中为 4000 至 4500 步/天。
无论在低还是高久坐时间水平下,每日步数高于参考的 2200 步/天与死亡率和心血管疾病风险降低相关。每天走 9000-10500 步与独立于久坐时间的最低死亡率风险相关。对于大致相当的每日步数,与高久坐时间相比,低久坐时间的心血管疾病事件风险更低。