Martinović Borja, Verkuyten Maykel
Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, European Research Centre on Migration and Ethnic Relations (ERCOMER), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul 24;35(1):123-161. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2023.2231762. eCollection 2024.
Even without legal ownership, groups can experience objects, places, and ideas as belonging to them ('ours'). This state of mind-collective psychological ownership-is understudied in social psychology, yet it is central to many intergroup conflicts and stewardship behaviour. We discuss our research on the psychological processes and social-psychological implications of collective psychological ownership. We studied territorial ownership, in different parts of the world and at different geographical levels, offering not only a cross-national but also conceptual replication of the processes. Our findings show that collective psychological ownership is inferred based on primo-occupancy, investment, and formation. Further, we demonstrate that collective psychological ownership can have positive intragroup and negative intergroup outcomes, which are guided by perceived group responsibility and exclusive determination right. We then discuss ownership threat (losing what is 'ours'), and we consider the role of group identification in ownership-related processes. We conclude by providing directions for future research.
即使没有法律所有权,群体也会将物品、场所和想法视为属于他们(“我们的”)。这种心理状态——集体心理所有权——在社会心理学中尚未得到充分研究,但它是许多群体间冲突和管理行为的核心。我们讨论了关于集体心理所有权的心理过程和社会心理影响的研究。我们在世界不同地区和不同地理层面研究了领土所有权,不仅提供了跨国研究,还对这些过程进行了概念性复制。我们的研究结果表明,集体心理所有权是基于首次占有、投入和形成来推断的。此外,我们证明集体心理所有权会产生积极的群体内结果和消极的群体间结果,这些结果由感知到的群体责任和排他性决定权引导。然后我们讨论所有权威胁(失去“我们的”东西),并考虑群体认同在与所有权相关过程中的作用。最后,我们为未来的研究提供了方向。